Cited by 294Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsReproductive Health and Contraception

Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance

Iams, Jay D., Johnson, Francee F., Sonck, Jiri, Sachs, Larry, Gebauer, Cathy, Samuels, Philip·1995·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective Our purpose was to investigate the hypothesis that cervical competence is a continuum that is related to cervical length and is reflected by pregnancy history.Study design A cross-sectional study was performed of cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in women with prior preterm delivery at < or = 26 weeks, 27 to 32 weeks, and 33 to 35 weeks compared with women with cervical incompetence and normal controls delivered at term.Results Transvaginal cervical length was measured during pregnancy in 32 subjects with cervical incompetence, 98 with previous preterm birth < or = 26 weeks, 98 with previous preterm birth at 27 to 32 weeks, 127 with previous preterm birth at 33 to 35 weeks, and 106 normal controls. The relationship between obstetric history and cervical length was evaluated by analysis of variance. The gestational age at the first preterm delivery was significantly correlated with cervical length in the current pregnancy at each gestational interval between 20 and 30 weeks in a continuous manner.Conclusion Cervical competence is a continuous rather than categoric variable and is indicated indirectly by measurement of the length of the cervix.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91469-2

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cervical insufficiency caused by congenital cervical weakness, surgery, or trauma has been implicated as causal for some preterm births, but its exact contribution to preterm birth is unknown.

    “Cervical insufficiency caused by congenital cervical weakness, surgery, or trauma has been implicated as causal for some preterm births; however, distinguishing cervical insufficiency from cervical shortening attributable to other causes has proven difficult, and the exact contribution to preterm birth is unknown.125”

    From Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth (2008) · cites this paper as [125]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iams, J. D., Johnson, F. F., Sonck, J., Sachs, L., Gebauer, C., & Samuels, P.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-04
Volume
172
Issue
4
Pages
1097-1106
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041937082
Cited by
294
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
cervical length, transvaginal ultrasound, preterm birth, cervical incompetence, obstetric history, gestational age
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Uterine Cervical Incompetence, Cervix Uteri, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review