Cited by 68Corneal surgery and disordersOcular Surface and Contact LensOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Morphology of the Cornea

Polack, Frank M.·1961·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9394(61)91794-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human corneal lamellae are typically up to 0.2 mm broad and 2 μm thick.

    “These structures are of variable thickness, in humans typically up to 0.2 mm broad and 2 μm thick (Polack, 1961, Komai and Ushiki, 1991).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Polack, 1961

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polack, F. M.
Corresponding author
Polack, Frank M.
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1961-05
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
1051/179-1056/184
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2205006529
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
cornea, corneal morphology, corneal anatomy
MeSH terms
Cornea, Coloring Agents, Humans, Silver, Staining and Labeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review