Morphology of the Cornea
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human corneal lamellae are typically up to 0.2 mm broad and 2 μm thick.
“These structures are of variable thickness, in humans typically up to 0.2 mm broad and 2 μm thick (Polack, 1961, Komai and Ushiki, 1991).”
From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Polack, 1961
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corneal structure and transparency
Meek, K. M., & Knupp, C. (2015) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
- Authors
- Polack, F. M.
- Corresponding author
- Polack, Frank M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1961-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1051/179-1056/184
- ISSN
- 0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2205006529
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Keywords
- cornea, corneal morphology, corneal anatomy
- MeSH terms
- Cornea, Coloring Agents, Humans, Silver, Staining and Labeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review