Cited by 1,686Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac tumors and thrombiCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation

Blackshear, Joseph L., Odell, John A.·1996·The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Background Left atrial appendage obliteration was historically ineffective for the prevention of postoperative stroke in patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation who underwent operative mitral valvotomy. It is, however, a routine part of modern "curative" operations for nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, such as the maze and corridor procedures.Methods To assess the potential of left atrial appendage obliteration to prevent stroke in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation patients, we reviewed previous reports that identified the etiology of atrial fibrillation and evaluated the presence and location of left atrial thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography, autopsy, or operation.Results Twenty-three separate studies were reviewed, and 446 of 3,504 (13%) rheumatic atrial fibrillation patients, and 222 of 1,288 (17%) nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation patients had a documented left atrial thrombus. Anticoagulation status was variable and not controlled for. Thrombi were localized to, or were present in the left atrial appendage and extended into the left atrial cavity in 254 of 446 (57%) of patients with rheumatic atrial fibrillation. In contrast, 201 of 222 (91%) of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation-related left atrial thrombi were isolated to, or originated in the left atrial appendage (p < 0.0001).Conclusions These data suggest that left atrial appendage obliteration is a strategy of potential value for stroke prophylaxis in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00887-x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blackshear, J. L., & Odell, J. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-02
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
755-759
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053482681
Cited by
1,686
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 61
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac tumors and thrombi
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, postoperative stroke, stroke prevention, left atrial thrombus, non-valvular atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, mitral valve surgery, maze procedure, anticoagulation
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Heart Atria, Heart Diseases, Humans, Mitral Valve Stenosis, Postoperative Complications, Thrombosis, Warfarin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review