The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A method for managing evidential reasoning in a hierarchical hypothesis space
Abstract
Although informal models of evidential reasoning have been successfully applied in automated reasoning systems, it is generally difficult to define the range of their applicability. In addition, they have not provided a basis for consistent management of evidence bearing on hypotheses that are related hierarchically. The Dempster–Shafer (D-S) theory of evidence is appealing because it does suggest a coherent approach for dealing with such relationships. However, the theory’s complexity and potential for computational inefficiency have tended to discourage its use in reasoning systems. In this paper we describe the central elements of the D-S theory, basing our exposition on simple examples drawn from the field of medicine. We then demonstrate the relevance of the D-S theory to a familiar expert-system domain, namely the bacterial-organism identification problem that lies at the heart of the mycin system. Finally, we present a new adaptation of the D-S approach that achieves computational efficiency while permitting the management of evidential reasoning within an abstraction hierarchy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art
Khaleghi, B., Khamis, A., Karray, F. O., & Razavi, S. N. (2013) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2011.08.001 · Cited by 2,074
The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model
Smets, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.55104 · Cited by 1,113
Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts
Murphy, C. K. (2000) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(99)00084-6 · Cited by 1,042
Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination
Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003 · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon, J., & Shortliffe, E. H.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-357
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092539663
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A method for managing evidential reasoning in a hierarchical hypothesis space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0004-3702(85)90064-5
- The paper
- Gordon, J., & Shortliffe, E. H. (1985). A method for managing evidential reasoning in a hierarchical hypothesis space. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(85)90064-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.