The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv10vm1qb · Cited by 11,711
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
Shafer, G. (1976) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691214696 · Cited by 9,083
Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
Dempster, A. P. (1967) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177698950 · Cited by 6,126
Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
Dempster, A. P. (2008) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-44792-4_3 · Cited by 5,296
A model of inexact reasoning in medicine
Shortliffe, E. H., & Buchanan, B. G. (1975) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(75)90047-4 · Cited by 1,447
The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems
Zadeh, L. A. (1983) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(83)80081-5 · Cited by 1,286
Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
Yager, R. R., Kacprzyk, J., & Fedrizzi, M. (1994) · Iris (University of Trento) · Cited by 1,028
Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes
Gupta, M. M. (1982) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)63380-9 · Cited by 674
Non-Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning
Smets, P., Mamdani, E. A. H., Didier Dubois, A., & Prade, H. M. (1988) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 405
A method for managing evidential reasoning in a hierarchical hypothesis space
Gordon, J., & Shortliffe, E. H. (1985) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(85)90064-5 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination
Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003 · Cited by 719
Deng, X., Liu, Q., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.033 · Cited by 615
Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence
Yong, D., WenKang, S., ZhenFu, Z., & Qi, L. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.04.015 · Cited by 579
A Survey on Security Threats and Detection Techniques in Cognitive Radio Networks
Fragkiadakis, A. G., Tragos, E. Z., & Askoxylakis, I. G. (2013) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2011.122211.00162 · Cited by 437
Wang, Y.-M., Yang, J.-B., Xu, D.-L., & Chin, K.-S. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.034 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, C. K.
- Venue
- Decision Support Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114463407
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-9236(99)00084-6
- The paper
- Murphy, C. K. (2000). Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9236(99)00084-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
