Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Qualitative physics using dimensional analysis

Bhaskar, R., Nigam, Anil·1990·Artificial Intelligence

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90038-2

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 130

Metadata

Authors
Bhaskar, R., & Nigam, A.
Affiliations
IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
Venue
Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-09
Volume
45
Issue
1-2
Pages
73-111
ISSN
0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121175589
Cited by
130
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Keywords
qualitative physics, dimensional analysis, dimensionless parameters, qualitative reasoning, pressure regulator, heat exchangers, physical variables, partial derivatives, heuristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative physics using dimensional analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90038-2
The paper
Bhaskar, R., & Nigam, A. (1990). Qualitative physics using dimensional analysis. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90038-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.