Cited by 179Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Applied relaxation vs. cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of panic disorder

Öst, Lars-Göran, Westling, Bengt E.·1995·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The present study investigated the efficacy of a coping-technique, applied relaxation (AR) and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), in the treatment of panic disorder. Thirty-eight outpatients fulfilling the DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder with no (n = 30) or mild (n = 8) avoidance were assessed with independent assessor ratings, self-report scales and self-observation of panic attacks before and after treatment, and at a 1-yr follow-up. The patients were treated individually for 12 weekly sessions. The results showed that both treatments yielded very large improvements, which were maintained, or furthered at follow-up. There was no difference between AR and CBT on any measure. The proportion of panic-free patients were 65 and 74% at post-treatment, and 82 and 89% at follow-up, for AR and CBT, respectively. There were no relapses at follow-up, on the contrary 55% of the patients who still had panic attacks at post-treatment were panic-free at follow-up. Besides affecting panic attacks the treatments also yielded marked and lasting changes on generalized anxiety, depression and cognitive misinterpretations. The conclusion that can be drawn is that both AR and CBT are effective treatments for panic disorder without avoidance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(94)e0026-f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 179

Authors
Öst, L.-G., & Westling, B. E.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
145-158
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033799919
Cited by
179
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
panic disorder, applied relaxation, cognitive behavioral therapy, coping strategies, avoidance, panic attacks, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, treatment efficacy, relapse prevention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Agoraphobia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Relaxation Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review