Cited by 147Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental manipulations of responsibility: An analogue test for models of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Abstract

Several authors attribute excessive responsibility a predominant role in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) [Salkovskis, P. M. (1985) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571-583; Rachman, S. (1993) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 149-154; van Oppen, P. & Arntz, A. (1994) Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 79-87]. The present studies aimed at demonstrating the link between different levels of perceived responsibility and checking behaviors by experimentally manipulating responsibility in non-clinical Ss. In the first study, a sound recognition task was used to compare checking behaviors in Ss with high (HR) and low (LR) perceived responsibility. Only one variable was significantly different, Ss from the HR group reporting more anxiety during the task than Ss from the LR group. Results did not support a link between responsibility and checking behavior. In a second study HR and LR Ss were compared on a manual classification task. Subjects from the HR group hesitated and checked more, and reported more preoccupation with errors and anxiety during the task than Ss from the LR group. Since perceived severity of the outcome was the most variable affected by the manipulation, the implications for current models of OCD are discussed and an alternative explanation is attempted. Finally, clinical implications are examined and suggestions are made for future directions of research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00024-r

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Carr, 1971, Compulsive neurosis: two psychological studies, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 24, 256
  2. Freeston, 1994, L'Inventaire d'Anxiété de Beck: Étude psychométrique d'une traduction française, Encéphale, XX, 47
  3. Rhéaume, 1995, Inflated responsibility and its role in OCD: II. Psychometric studies of a semi-idiographic measure, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–146 of 146

Metadata

Authors
Ladouceur, R., Rhéaume, J., Freeston, M. H., Aublet, F., Jean, K., Lachance, S., Langlois, F., & de Pokomandy-morin, K.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
937-946
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032546163
Cited by
147
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, perceived responsibility, checking behavior, anxiety, outcome severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Social Responsibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review