Cited by 108Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

One-session cognitive treatment of dental phobia: preparing dental phobics for treatment by restructuring negative cognitions

De Jongh, Ad, Muris, Peter, Horst, Guusje Ter, Van Zuuren, Florence, Schoenmakers, Nelleke, Makkes, Peter·1995·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a single session of cognitive restructuring in a sample of phobic dental patients. Fifty-two patients were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: cognitive restructuring (modification of negative cognitions), provision of information (about oral health and dental treatment), and a waiting list control condition. Both interventions maximally lasted one hour. In comparison with the waiting list control condition and the information intervention condition, the cognitive intervention condition not only showed a large decrease in frequency and believability of negative cognitions, but also exhibited a clear decline in dental trait anxiety. Analysis at a follow-up of one year demonstrated a further, drastic reduction in dental anxiety in both intervention conditions, wherein the difference among these conditions was not maintained. It is concluded that it is possible to obtain substantial reductions of dental trait anxiety through a single session of cognitive restructuring. Nevertheless, repeated exposure to the dental situation seems necessary for a further reduction of anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00027-u

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have demonstrated better results using CBT techniques compared to other kinds of behaviour management regardless of methodology.

    “Studies have also demonstrated better results using CBT techniques compared to other kinds of behaviour management regardless of methodology 8,25-27 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Jongh, A., Muris, P., Horst, G. T., Van Zuuren, F., Schoenmakers, N., & Makkes, P.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
947-954
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119228154
Cited by
108
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
dental phobia, dental anxiety, cognitive restructuring, single-session intervention, negative thinking, trait anxiety, information interventions, repeated exposure, anxiety reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Brief, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Dental Anxiety, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review