The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservation of wetlands: Do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076
Cited by
The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment
Grace, J. B. (1999) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00063 · Cited by 558
The Assembly of Experimental Wetland Plant Communities
Weiher, E., & Keddy, P. A. (1995) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545956 · Cited by 469
Self-citationStrategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: A review
Barrat-Segretain, M. H. (1996) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00044885 · Cited by 267
Co‐Occurring Tree Species Change Rank in Seedling Performance with Resources Varied Experimentally
Latham, R. E. (1992) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941461 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, D. R. J., Keddy, P. A., Gaudet, C. L., & Wisheu, I. C.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-217
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979859372
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation of wetlands: Do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0006-3207(89)90065-7
- The paper
- Moore, D. R. J., Keddy, P. A., Gaudet, C. L., & Wisheu, I. C. (1989). Conservation of wetlands: Do infertile wetlands deserve a higher priority? Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(89)90065-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
