The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation
Pulliam, H. R. (1988) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284880 · Cited by 5,367
Branch-and-Bound Methods: A Survey
Lawler, E. L., & Wood, D. E. (1966) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.14.4.699 · Cited by 1,997
What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice
Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J., & Williams, P. H. (1991) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(91)90030-d · Cited by 1,687
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection
Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C. J., Margules, C. R., Vane-Wright, R. I., & Williams, P. H. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-i · Cited by 1,047
Self-citationSelecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity
Margules, C. R., Nicholls, A. O., & Pressey, R. L. (1988) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90078-x · Cited by 688
Self-citationNature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis
(1992) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(92)90596-f · Cited by 633
Kirkpatrick, J. B. (1983) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(83)90056-3 · Cited by 504
Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem
Church, R. L., Stoms, D. M., & Davis, F. W. (1996) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00102-6 · Cited by 475
A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon
Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P. H., Pressey, R. L., Camm, J. D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, A. R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso, M., et al. (1997) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(96)00068-7 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Cited by
Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity
Cabeza, M., & Moilanen, A. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02125-5 · Cited by 484
A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon
Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P. H., Pressey, R. L., Camm, J. D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, A. R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso, M., et al. (1997) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(96)00068-7 · Cited by 448
Self-citationMathematical Methods for Spatially Cohesive Reserve Design
McDonnell, M. D., Possingham, H. P., Ball, I. R., & Cousins, E. A. (2002) · Environmental Modeling & Assessment · doi:10.1023/a:1015649716111 · Cited by 253
Self-citationNational park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements
Shafer, C. L. (1999) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00115-7 · Cited by 92
Optimality in prioritizing conservation projects
Hanson, J. O., Schuster, R., Strimas‐Mackey, M., & Bennett, J. R. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13264 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Pressey, R. L., Possingham, H. P., & Margules, C. R.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-267
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109871461
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 16.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0006-3207(95)00120-4
- The paper
- Pressey, R. L., Possingham, H. P., & Margules, C. R. (1996). Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(95)00120-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
