Cited by 300Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsEpilepsy research and treatment

Acute dendrotoxic changes in the hippocampus of kainate treated rats

Olney, J.W., Fuller, T., De Gubareff, T.·1979·Brain Research

Abstract

Kainic acid (KA), a potent neuroexcitatory and neurotoxic analog of glutamate (Glu), induces a widespread pattern of brain damage when administered subcutaneously to adult rats. The hippocampus is among the brain regions most consistently and severely damaged. Here we describe acute swelling of certain spines and branchlets of dendrites as the first detectable sign of KA neurotoxic changes in the hippocampus. These swellings conform to a laminar pattern suggesting selective toxic interaction of KA at specific levels of the dendritic trees of hippocampal pyramidal and dentate granule neurons. The frequency and severity of involvement of each type of hippocampal neuron at each level of its dendritic tree was roughly estimated and neuronal types were ranked from the most to least extensively involved (CA3 greater than CA4 greater than CA1 greater than CA2 greater than dentate granules). The same rank order has been described for the vulnerability of these neurons to acute destruction following intraventricular KA administration. Because the pattern of dendritic dilatations observed corresponds well with the pattern of termination of putative glutamergic inputs to the hippocampus, we interpret the findings as being consistent with the hypothesis that the toxic effects of KA are mediated through glutamergic excitatory receptors. We propose that the sensitivity of a given neuron to the neurodestructive action of KA may be determined by the percentage of its dendritic surface occupi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90872-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal models show that structural changes preceding cell death include cell body swelling, chromatin clumping, development of dendritic varicosities, and swelling or loss of dendritic spines.

    “Such changes include cell body swelling, chromatin clumping, development of dendritic varicosities, and swelling or loss of dendritic spines (Olney et al., 1979;Choi, 1994).”
  • Dendritic spines undergo some of the earliest structural changes during excitotoxic injury to neurons.

    “Reports have suggested that dendritic spines undergo some of the earliest structural changes during excitotoxic injury to neurons (Olney et al., 1979).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olney, J. W., Fuller, T., & De Gubareff, T.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-10
Volume
176
Issue
1
Pages
91-100
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067923604
Cited by
300
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
kainic acid, excitotoxicity, hippocampus, dendritic swelling, glutamate receptors, pyramidal neurons, dentate gyrus granule cells, CA3, CA4, CA1, CA2, neuronal vulnerability, glutamatergic input
MeSH terms
Animals, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Histocytochemistry, Kainic Acid, Male, Pyrrolidines, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review