Cited by 23Burn Injury Management and OutcomesThermoregulation and physiological responsesWound Healing and Treatments

A guide to the rate of non-renal water loss from patients with burns

Davies, J.W.L., Lamke, L.-O., Liljedahl, S.-O.·1974·British Journal of Plastic Surgery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0007-1226(74)90031-9

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, J. W. L., Lamke, L.-O., & Liljedahl, S.-O.
Affiliations
Birmingham Accident Hospital (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Plastic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-10
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
325-329
ISSN
0007-1226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014598536
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
burn patients, evaporation, water balance, burned area, third-degree burns, second-degree burns, exposure methods, weight loss, ambient temperature, relative humidity
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Burns, Environment, Controlled, Exudates and Transudates, Humans, Humidity, Infusions, Parenteral, Temperature, Time Factors, Water Loss, Insensible

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review