Cited by 22Geochemistry and Elemental AnalysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Precise determination of variations in the ratios of marine ferromanganese nodules

Amakawa, Hiroshi, Nozaki, Yoshiyuki, Masuda, Akimasa·1996·Chemical Geology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0009-2541(96)00066-6

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amakawa, H., Nozaki, Y., & Masuda, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Electro-Communications (JP)
Venue
Chemical Geology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-09
Volume
131
Issue
1-4
Pages
183-195
ISSN
0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006736575
Cited by
22
References
42
Citations by year
2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Geology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
cerium isotopes, Nd isotopes, seawater geochemistry, continental crust, mid-ocean ridge basalt, scavenging, residence time, Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review