The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disposition of intravenous and oral cyclosporine after administration with grapefruit juice*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of grapefruit juice on the disposition of cyclosporine after administration of oral and intravenous doses to healthy male subjects. METHODS: Subjects received two oral doses of cyclosporine (7.5 mg/kg) and two intravenous doses (2.5 mg/kg infused for 3 hours), with each dose separated by a 1-week washout period. Grapefruit juice (250 ml) was ingested immediately before one oral and one intravenous dose and again 2 hours later. Blood samples were collected for a 24-hour period, and whole blood concentrations of cyclosporine were measured with use of a specific monoclonal radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Grapefruit juice had no effect on any pharmacokinetic parameter when given with intravenous cyclosporine. After oral administration, grapefruit juice significantly increased peak concentration (936 versus 1340 ng/ml), as well as area under the curve (6722 versus 10,730 ng . hr/ml) but had no effect on elimination half-life. Absolute bioavailability of cyclosporine was increased from 0.22 to 0.36 (average increase, 62%) by grapefruit juice. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of effect on systemic clearance after intravenous cyclosporine suggests that grapefruit juice improves oral bioavailability by increasing absorption or reducing gut wall metabolism. The latter is more likely in view of studies that suggest significant gut wall metabolism of cyclosporine by CYP3A enzymes known to be inhibited by components of grapefruit juice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dresser, G. K., Spence, J. D., & Bailey, D. G. (2000) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200038010-00003 · Cited by 908
Martinez, M. N., & Amidon, G. L. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1177/00970002042006005 · Cited by 536
Prediction of in vivo drug clearance from in vitro data. I: Impact of inter-individual variability
Howgate, E. M., Rowland Yeo, K., Proctor, N. J., Tucker, G. T., & Rostami-Hodjegan, A. (2006) · Xenobiotica · doi:10.1080/00498250600683197 · Cited by 223
Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin
Lilja, J. J., Neuvonen, M., & Neuvonen, P. J. (2004) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02095.x · Cited by 157
Prediction of metabolic drug clearance in humans:In vitro–in vivoextrapolationvsallometric scaling
Shiran, M. R., Proctor, N. J., Howgate, E. M., Rowland-Yeo, K., Tucker, G. T., & Rostami-Hodjegan, A. (2006) · Xenobiotica · doi:10.1080/00498250600761662 · Cited by 89
Komura, H., & Iwaki, M. (2011) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.3109/03602532.2011.597401 · Cited by 78
Effects of grapefruit juice on the absorption of levothyroxine
Lilja, J. J., Laitinen, K., & Neuvonen, P. J. (2005) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02433.x · Cited by 74
Predicting Food–Drug Interactions between Piperine and CYP3A4 Substrate Drugs Using PBPK Modeling
Lin, F., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Zhong, D., & Liu, J. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms252010955 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ducharme, M. P., Warbasse, L. H., & Edwards, D. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 485-491
- ISSN
- 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6535
- OpenAlex
- W2034853089
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.