CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 176Bat Biology and Ecology StudiesTactile and Sensory InteractionsAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

A view of the world through the bat's ear: The formation of acoustic images in echolocation

Simmons, James A.·1989·Cognition
DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90009-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Echolocating bats perceive objects as acoustic images derived from echoes of the ultrasonic sounds they emit. They can detect, track, identify, and intercept flying insects using sonar. Many species, such as the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, emit frequency-modulated sonar sounds and perceive the distance to targets, or target range, from the delay of echoes. For Eptesicus, a point-target's image has a sharpness along the range axis that is determined by the acuity of echo-delay perception, which is about 10 ns under favorable conditions. The image as a whole has a fine range structure that corresponds to the cross-correlation function between emissions and echoes. A complex target- which has reflecting points, called "glints", located at slightly different distances and reflects echoes containing overlapping components with slightly different delays--is perceived in terms of its range profile. The separation of the glints along the range dimension is encoded by the shape of the echo spectrum created by interference between overlapping echo components. However, Eptesicus transforms the echo spectrum back into an estimate of the original delay separation of echo components. The bat thus converts spectral cues into elements of an image expressed in terms of range. The absolute range of the nearest glint is encoded by the arrival time of the earliest echo component, and the spectrally encoded range separation of additional glints is referred to this time-encoded reference range for the image as a whole. Each individual glint is represented by a cross-correlation function for its own echo component, the nearest of which is computed directly from arrival-time measurements while further ones are computed by transformation of the echo spectrum. The bat then sums the cross-correlation functions for multiple glints to form the entire image of the complex target. Range and shape are two distinct features of targets that are separately encoded by the bat's auditory system, but the bat perceives unitary images that require fusion of these features to create a synthetic psychological dimension of range. The bat's use of cross-correlation-like images reveals neural computations that achieve fusion of stimulus features and offers an example of high-level operations involved in the formation of perceptual "wholes".

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90009-7

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The active process of emission and comparison enables the bat to assemble an image of the external world and thus successfully navigate and predate.

    “Like the mormyrid, this active process of emission and comparison enables the bat to assemble an image of the external world55–57 and thus successfully navigate and predate.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [55]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Simmons, J. A.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Simmons, James A.
ORCID
Simmons, James A.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-11
Volume
33
Issue
1-2
Pages
155-199
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0010-0277(89)90009-7
OpenAlex
W2070598675
Cited by
176
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000521-07)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (7-KO2-MH00521)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
echolocation, acoustic images, Eptesicus fuscus, glint detection, cross correlation function, range profile, feature fusion, auditory scene analysis, target identification, target interception
MeSH terms
Animals, Auditory Pathways, Brain, Brain Mapping, Chiroptera, Echolocation, Orientation, Predatory Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review