CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 230Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: Image and action

Holland, Peter C.·1990·Cognition
DOI 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90020-k
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In a typical Pavlovian conditioning experiment, a relatively insignificant event, the conditioned stimulus (CS), is paired with a biologically more meaningful event, the unconditioned stimulus (US). As a consequence of those pairings, the CS is thought to acquire response characteristics of the US. In this article I describe experiments with rats that suggest that under some circumstances, the CS acquires control of perceptual processing of the US, in the absence of that US itself. I present three kinds of evidence for this surrogate processing, which I liken to imagery or hallucination: (1) CSs come to control specific, sensory-evaluative responses normally evoked only by the USs; (2) CSs can substitute for USs in the establishment of new learning about those USs themselves; (3) CSs can substitute for USs in the modulation of conditioning to other events, either overshadowing (interfering) or potentiating learning, in the same manner as the USs themselves. Finally, I compare these data with evidence for conditioned sensation and imagery in humans, and suggest that imagery may be a very basic process, evolutionarily derived from perceptual and conditioning processes adapted to deal with remote or absent objects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90020-k

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Holland, 1984, The Origins of Pavlovian conditioned behavior, Vol. 18, 129

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–230 of 230

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Holland, P. C.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Holland, Peter C.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-11
Volume
37
Issue
1-2
Pages
105-131
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0010-0277(90)90020-k
OpenAlex
W2088054419
Cited by
229
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
classical conditioning, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned stimulus, imagery, hallucinations, overshadowing, potentiation, perceptual processing, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Concept Formation, Discrimination Learning, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Columbidae, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review