Cited by 530Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningDesign Education and Practice

In search of insight

Kaplan, Craig A, Simon, Herbert A·1990·Cognitive Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90008-r

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kaplan and Simon observed that fast subjects tended to pay attention to perceptual invariants in the display more often than slow subjects.

    “Kaplan and Simon also observed that one of the key differences distinguishing fast from slow subjects was that the former tended to pay attention to the perceptual invariants in the display more often than the latter.”

    From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [45]

  • Kaplan and Simon found that insight was greatly facilitated if the critical attribute for solving the problem was displayed in a perceptually salient manner.

    “The results revealed that insight was greatly facilitated if the critical attribute for solving the problem was displayed in a perceptually salient manner.”

    From Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations (1992) · cites this paper as [45]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Simon, Herbert A
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-07
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
374-419
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991218162
Cited by
530
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
insight problem solving, problem representation, parity, feature saliency, prior knowledge, heuristics, verbal protocols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review