The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Broken agreement
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236
Monitoring and self-repair in speech.
Levelt, W. (1983) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4 · Cited by 1,676
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03214546 · Cited by 1,432
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1500031x · Cited by 733
Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation
Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903321107855 · Cited by 425
Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension
Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2653 · Cited by 403
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bock, K., & Miller, C. A.
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-93
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4245765565
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Broken agreement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
- The paper
- Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
