The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479 · cited 1×
“Although a number of studies have examined differences between experts and novices in pattern recognition (Biederman & Shiffrar, 1988; Chase & Simon, 1973) and conceptual organization (e.g., Chi, Feltovich, & Glaser, 1981; Murphy & Wright, 1984; Schvaneveldt, Durso, Goldsmith, Breen, & Cooke,…”
Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061 · Cited by 3,072
Cited by
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682
Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review
Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3 · Cited by 1,204
The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562165 · Cited by 859
A neural basis for expert object recognition
Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00308 · Cited by 500
Self-citationStudies on the Formation of Perceptually Based Basic-Level Categories in Young Infants
Eimas, P. D., & Quinn, P. C. (1994) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00792.x · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M.
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 457-482
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038842628
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90016-h
- The paper
- Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90016-h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
