Cited by 500Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

A neural basis for expert object recognition

Tanaka, James W., Curran, Tim·2001·Psychological Science

Abstract

Although most adults are considered to be experts in the identification of faces, fewer people specialize in the recognition of other objects, such as birds and dogs. In this research, the neurophysiological processes associated with expert bird and dog recognition were investigated using event-related potentials. An enhanced early negative component (N170, 164 ms) was found when bird and dog experts categorized objects in their domain of expertise relative to when they categorized objects outside their domain of expertise. This finding indicates that objects from well-learned categories are neurologically differentiated from objects from lesser-known categories at a relatively early stage of visual processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.00308

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These processing benefits are also associated with changes in the response properties of ERPs recorded within the first 200 ms of processing stimuli.

    “These processing benefits are linked to functional reorganizations in the response properties of a region of the right fusiform gyrus [32], which are also associated with changes in the response properties of ERPs recorded within the first 200 ms of processing stimuli [33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T.
Affiliations
  • Oberlin College (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Tanaka, James W.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2001-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
43-47
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2100976300
Cited by
500
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 25
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave
  • Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division
  • Scottish Government
  • James Hutton Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
object recognition, expertise, N170, face processing, early visual processing, event-related potentials, category learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review