Cited by 8Evolution and Genetic DynamicsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyProbability and Statistical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An algorithm accounting for plating efficiency in estimating spontaneous mutation rates

Jones, Michael E.·1993·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

An algorithm is described for calculating the probability distribution of the number of mutant colonies arising in a Luria-Delbrück fluctuation experiment subject to a plating efficiency of less than 100%. A table is constructed to facilitate the estimation of spontaneous mutation rates taking into account the plating efficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-4825(93)90093-g

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Luria, 1943, Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance, Genetics, 28, 491, 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lea, 1949, The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations, J. Genet., 49, 264, 10.1007/BF02986080 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Featherstone, 1987, Problems and pitfalls in assessing human T-lymphocyte mutant frequencies, Mutat. Res., 179, 215, 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90312-5 · DOI
  4. Kendal, 1988, Pitfalls and practice of Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis: a review, Cancer Res., 48, 1060
  5. Feller, 1968, Vol. 1, 264
  6. Knuth, 1981, Vol. 2, 25
  7. Press, 1986, 194
  8. Capizzi, 1973, A table for the estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate of cells in culture, Mutat. Res., 17, 147, 10.1016/0027-5107(73)90265-0 · DOI
  9. Armitage, 1952, The statistical theory of bacterial populations subject to mutation, J. R. statist. Soc., B14, 1, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1952.tb00098.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Li, 1987, Evaluation of methods for the estimation of mutation rates in cultured mammalian cell populations, Mutat. Res., 190, 281, 10.1016/0165-7992(87)90010-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Jones, M. E.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Jones, Michael E.
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-11
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
455-461
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013963802
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
plating efficiency, spontaneous mutation rate, probability distributions, mutation rate estimation, bacterial mutagenesis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Cells, Cultured, Clone Cells, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Probability, Selection, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An algorithm accounting for plating efficiency in estimating spontaneous mutation rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0010-4825(93)90093-g
The paper
Jones, M. E. (1993). An algorithm accounting for plating efficiency in estimating spontaneous mutation rates. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4825(93)90093-g