Reaction-front fingering in carbonate-cemented sandstones
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The basic consequence of this instability is that the reaction zone, even if initially planar, tends to become fingered in the general direction of the brine's flow.
“The basic consequence of this instability (for example, Wei and Ortoleva, 1990;and Aharonov and others, 1997) is that the reaction zone, even if initially planar, tends to become fingered in the general direction of the brine's flow.”
From Self-accelerating dolomite-for-calcite replacement: Self-organized dynamics of burial dolomitization and associated mineralization (2011) · cites this paper as Wei and Ortoleva, 1990
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Merino, E., & Canals, A. (2011) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/07.2011.01 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wei, C., & Ortoleva, P.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- ORCID
- Ortoleva, Peter
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 183-198
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087070034
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Earth-Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
- Keywords
- water-rock interaction, flow focusing, reactive transport modeling, scalloping, capping, calcite, dolomite, diagenesis, petroleum engineering, porous media flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
