Cited by 135Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentMosquito-borne diseases and controlMalaria Research and Control

Factors influencing infection of the mosquito with Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856)

Kartman, Leo·1953·Experimental Parasitology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0014-4894(53)90005-8

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kartman, L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Kartman, Leo
Venue
Experimental Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1953-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
27-78
ISSN
0014-4894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965413012
Cited by
127
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Experimental Parasitology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, canine heartworm disease, Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Culex quinquefasciatus, Culex pipiens, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Anopheles freeborni, interspecific hybrids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review