The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship of hydrogen peroxide‐producing lactobacilli to bacterial vaginosis and genital microflora in pregnant women
Abstract
Lactobacilli provide an important microbial defense against genital colonization by pathogens. The role of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the control of genital microflora was explored in a cross-sectional study of 275 women in the second trimester of pregnancy. Vaginal cultures were obtained for detection of H2O2-positive and H2O2-negative lactobacilli and other members of the genital microflora. Compared with women with H2O2-negative lactobacilli, women colonized by H2O2-positive lactobacilli were less likely to have bacterial vaginosis, symptomatic candidiasis, and vaginal colonization by Gardnerella vaginalis, Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and viridans streptococci (P less than or equal to .05 for each comparison). In addition to the above organisms, women without vaginal lactobacilli were more likely than those women with H2O2-positive lactobacilli to have Chlamydia trachomatis, and less likely to be colonized by Enterococcus or coagulase-negative staphylococci (P less than .05 for each comparison). Vaginal colonization by group B streptococci or Escherichia coli was not related to the presence of H2O2-positive lactobacilli. These data suggest that the presence of H2O2-positive lactobacilli in the vagina is inversely correlated with infection by some genital pathogens in pregnant women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Romero, R., Hassan, S. S., Gajer, P., Tarca, A. L., Fadrosh, D. W., Nikita, L., Galuppi, M., Lamont, R. F., Chaemsaithong, P., Miranda, J., et al. (2014) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-4 · Cited by 852
Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors
Gonçalves, B., Ferreira, C., Alves, C. T., Henriques, M., Azeredo, J., & Silva, S. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/1040841x.2015.1091805 · Cited by 669
Wiesenfeld, H. C., Hillier, S. L., Krohn, M. A., Landers, D. V., & Sweet, R. L. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/367658 · Cited by 546
Self-citationThe Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_3731 · Cited by 382
Boskey, E. R., Telsch, K. M., Whaley, K. J., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A. (1999) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.67.10.5170-5175.1999 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillier, S., Krohn, M., Klebanoff, S., & Eschenbach, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-152
- ISSN
- 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
- 0020-7292
- 1879-3479
- OpenAlex
- W2041079265
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship of hydrogen peroxide‐producing lactobacilli to bacterial vaginosis and genital microflora in pregnant women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0020-7292(92)90920-e
- The paper
- Hillier, S., Krohn, M., Klebanoff, S., & Eschenbach, D. (1992). The relationship of hydrogen peroxide‐producing lactobacilli to bacterial vaginosis and genital microflora in pregnant women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(92)90920-e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.