Cited by 45Nursing education and managementQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsCritical Realism in Sociology

Entering the field: intrusions of the social and its exclusion from studies of nursing practice

Purkis, Mary Ellen·1994·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

In this paper the exclusion of 'the social' from studies of nursing practice is addressed with regard to two important pieces of empirical fieldwork. The claim advanced in this paper is that methods currently advanced in the nursing literature for gathering and analyzing data, are constituted by theoretical notions which themselves exclude the social from understandings of nursing practice. Drawing on structuration theory, the paper advances an understanding of the research process as one parallel to nursing or that of any other practice-based discipline. Accounts arising from the research projects of Field and Benner are examined critically in this paper. The examination is informed by wider social theory, but with particular reference to Giddens' (1984) theoretical formulations. It is concluded that unless the knowledgeability of social actors is accounted for, both in the planning of empirical research studies and in interpreting the findings of such studies, crucial aspects of social conduct organized through nursing practice and organizing nursing practice are excluded from considerations of practice. The implications of such exclusion are addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0020-7489(94)90073-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benner's theory has been previously critiqued for a simplistic positive view of progress that recommends retraining without attention to place or social knowledge and structure.

    “Benner's (2001) theory has been previously critiqued for a simplistic positive view of progress that recommends retraining without attention to place (Purkis 1994) or social knowledge/structure (Thompson 1990).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purkis, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Purkis, Mary Ellen
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-08
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
315-336
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038125536
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
Keywords
nursing practice, structuration theory, social theory, nursing research methodology, knowledgeability, Anthony Giddens
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Humans, Language, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Process, Nursing Theory, Power, Psychological, Professional Practice, Psychological Theory, Social Behavior, Nursing Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review