CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesHealth disparities and outcomesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formal education as a marker for increased mortality and morbidity in rheumatoid arthritis

Pincus, Theodore, Callahan, Leigh F.·1985·Journal of Chronic Diseases
DOI 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90095-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Increased mortality and morbidity was seen in association with lower formal educational levels in 75 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients over 9 years. Nine of the 20 patients with 8 or fewer years of education had died, compared to 10 of 34 with 9-12 years of education, and only one of 21 with more than 12 years of education. Among survivors with functional capacity data available from baseline and 9 year review, declines greater than 20% were seen in 8 of 10, 13 of 21, and 9 of 19 patients in the three education categories. Overall, 79% of grade-school educated, 43% of high-school educated, and 20% of college-educated patients had either died or declined more than 50% in functional capacity. Patients of different formal educational levels were similar at baseline in age, duration of disease, measures of functional capacity, number of involved hand joints, number of severe radiographic changes, use of gold, oral corticosteroids or other therapies, and associations between formal educational level and disease course are not explained by these variables. Formal educational level appears a simple quantitative marker which identifies a surrogate or composite variable associated with increased mortality and morbidity in RA.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90095-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Allebeck, 1981, Increased mortality among persons with rheumatoid arthritis, but where RA does not appear on death certificate, J Rheum, 10, 301
  2. Vandenbroucke, 1984, Survival and cause of death in rheumatoid arthritis, J Rheum, 11, 158
  3. Cosh, 1984, Survival and death in rheumatoid arthritis, editorial, J Rheum, 11, 117

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 198

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pincus, T., & Callahan, L. F.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Pincus, Theodore
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Chronic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-01
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
973-984
ISSN
0021-9681 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0021-9681(85)90095-5
OpenAlex
W2054433388
Cited by
198
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Chronic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (AM 22071)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, educational attainment, mortality, functional capacity, disease severity, socioeconomic factors, health disparities
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Tennessee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review