The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimum disclosure proofs of knowledge
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
New directions in cryptography
Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1976.1055638 · Cited by 14,713
Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (2014) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 · Cited by 8,299
The complexity of theorem-proving procedures
Cook, S. A. (1971) · Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '71 · doi:10.1145/800157.805047 · Cited by 6,385
Goldwasser, S., & Micali, S. (1984) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(84)90070-9 · Cited by 2,603
Proceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
(2024) · doi:10.1145/3618260 · Cited by 1,730
Security without identification: transaction systems to make big brother obsolete
Chaum, D. (1985) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/4372.4373 · Cited by 1,666
Self-citation
Cited by
Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Computer and communications security - CCS '93 · doi:10.1145/168588.168596 · Cited by 4,712
Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols
Canetti, R. (2001) · Proceedings 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.2001.959888 · Cited by 3,309
Multiparty unconditionally secure protocols
Chaum, D., Crépeau, C., & Damgard, I. (1988) · Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '88 · doi:10.1145/62212.62214 · Cited by 1,544
Self-citationEfficient group signature schemes for large groups: Extended abstract
Camenisch, J., & Stadler, M. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0052252 · Cited by 1,083
Designated Verifier Proofs and Their Applications
Jakobsson, M., Sako, K., & Impagliazzo, R. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-68339-9_13 · Cited by 817
Metadata
- Authors
- Brassard, G., Chaum, D., & Crépeau, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer and System Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-189
- ISSN
- 0022-0000 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151433956
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 9055 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimum disclosure proofs of knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-0000(88)90005-0
- The paper
- Brassard, G., Chaum, D., & Crépeau, C. (1988). Minimum disclosure proofs of knowledge. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0000(88)90005-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
