Cited by 135Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsCrystallization and Solubility StudiesCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

Factors influencing the crystallisation of calcium oxalate in urine—Critique

Robertson, W.G., Scurr, D.S., Bridge, Christine M.·1981·Journal of Crystal Growth

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-0248(81)90064-6

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robertson, W. G., Scurr, D. S., & Bridge, C. M.
Affiliations
Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Journal of Crystal Growth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-05
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
182-194
ISSN
0022-0248 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083475083
Cited by
135
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Crystal Growth (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Keywords
calcium oxalate, crystalluria, kidney stones, nucleation, crystal growth, crystal aggregation, urinary supersaturation, hyperoxaluria, hypercalciuria, glycosaminoglycans, RNA, seed crystal growth, spontaneous precipitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review