Cited by 250Statistical Mechanics and EntropyComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

Additivity and the entropy concept: An axiomatic approach to inequality measurement

Cowell, Frank A, Kuga, Kiyoshi·1981·Journal of Economic Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-0531(81)90020-x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowell, F. A., & Kuga, K.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Venue
Journal of Economic Theory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-08
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
131-143
ISSN
0022-0531 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072060617
Cited by
250
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Economic Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
inequality measurement, entropy additivity, kinetic exchange models, heterogeneous agents, power-law tails, generalized gamma distribution, κ-deformation, wealth distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review