Cited by 227Personality Traits and PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionFacilities and Workplace Management

Personal space

Little, Kenneth B.·1965·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(65)90028-4

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CID paradigm is a widely used validated paradigm, previously tested on different sex and age groups, and modulated using different protagonists.

    “This is a widely used validated paradigm (Little, 1965;Duke and Kiebach, 1974), which has been previously tested on different sex and age groups (e.g.Duke et al., 1974;Tennis and Dabbs, 1975), and modulated using different protagonists (Nechamkin et al., 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Little, K. B.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Little, Kenneth B.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1965-08
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
237-247
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4236938591
Cited by
227
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
Keywords
personal space, interpersonal distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review