Cited by 79Social Power and Status DynamicsPsychology of Social InfluenceExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The obligation to help: The effects of amount of prior help on subsequent helping behavior

Wilke, H., Lanzetta, John T.·1970·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(70)90058-2

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilke, H., & Lanzetta, J. T.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1970-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
488-493
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052664687
Cited by
79
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
32.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
helping behavior, reciprocity, social exchange theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review