CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 127

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physical aggression as a function of objective self-awareness and attitudes toward punishment

Carver, Charles S.·1975·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(75)90002-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(75)90002-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Buss, 1966, Instrumentality of aggression, feedback, and frustration as determinants of physical aggression, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 153, 10.1037/h0022826 · DOI
  2. Carver, 1974, Facilitation of physical aggression through objective self-awareness, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 365, 10.1016/0022-1031(74)90032-8 · DOI
  3. Ickes, 1973, Objective self-awareness and self-esteem, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 202, 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90010-3 · DOI
  4. Scheier, 1974, Self-awareness and physical aggression, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 264, 10.1016/0022-1031(74)90072-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carver, C. S.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-11
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
510-519
ISSN
0022-1031
DOI
10.1016/0022-1031(75)90002-5
Cited by
127
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review