Cited by 42Social and Intergroup PsychologySport Psychology and PerformancePersonality Traits and Psychology

When actions speak louder than words: Implicational schemata and the attribution of ability

Reeder, Glenn D, Fulks, Jeffery L·1980·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(80)90034-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is much less plausible that someone who is not athletic but is motivated to appear to be a good athlete could behave in a very athletic fashion for any length of time than that someone motivated to appear culturally literate could act culturally literate during a brief interaction.

    “Whereas virtually anyone who is motivated to deceive another by appearing to be culturally literate, for example, could act in a culturally literate manner during a brief interaction (if given some time to prepare), it is much less plausible that someone who is not athletic but is motivated to appear to be a good athlete could behave in a very athletic fashion for any length of time”

    From Suspicion and Dispositional Inference (1993) · cites this paper as Reeder & Fulks, 1980

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeder, G. D., & Fulks, J. L.
Affiliations
Illinois State University (US)
Corresponding author
Reeder, Glenn D
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
33-46
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047203721
Cited by
42
References
2
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
ability attribution, dispositional attribution, situational demands, causal attribution, observer evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review