Cited by 528Global trade and economicsMerger and Competition AnalysisGlobal Trade and Competitiveness

Endogenous market structures in international trade (natura facit saltum)

Horstmann, Ignatius J., Markusen, James R.·1992·Journal of International Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1996(92)90038-l

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horstmann, I. J., & Markusen, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
Journal of International Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-02
Volume
32
Issue
1-2
Pages
109-129
ISSN
0022-1996 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053192288
Cited by
528
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 27
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of International Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
Keywords
endogenous market structure, imperfect competition, international trade, Nash equilibrium, duopoly, multinational corporations, export competition, welfare effects, price jumps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review