The Production Relocation and Price Effects of US Trade Policy: The Case of Washing Machines
Open accessAbstract
We estimate the price effect of US import restrictions on washers. The 2012 and 2016 antidumping duties against South Korea and China were accompanied by downward or minor price movements along with production relocation to other export platform countries. With the 2018 tariffs, on nearly all source countries, the price of washers increased nearly 12 percent. Interestingly, the price of dryers—not subject to tariffs—increased by an equivalent amount. Factoring in dryer prices and price increases by domestic brands, the 2018 tariffs on washers imply a tariff elasticity of consumer prices of above one. (JEL F13, F14, F23, L68, 019, P33)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
3 of 24 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The paper's findings reflect a third-country effect from trade policy.
“These findings reflect a third-country effect from trade policy that has been discussed in various works by Bagwell and Staiger (see Bagwell, Bown and Staiger 2016, for a review).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bagwell, Bown and Staiger 2016 source
- Findingown data
The price of dryers, a complementary good not subject to the 2018 tariffs, increased by an amount equivalent to the washer price increase.
“We find that in response to the 2018 tariffs on nearly all source countries, the price of washers rose by nearly 12 percent; the price of dryersa complementary good not subject to tariffs-increased by an equivalent amount.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“Moreover, we show that prices of a complementary good-clothes dryers-also jumped at the same time by a similar magnitude, despite the fact that these products were not subject to any new tariffs during this period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Findingnone given
China accounted for 80 percent of washing machine imports into the United States prior to the application of tariffs.
“Although China accounted for a whopping 80 percent of washing machine imports into the United States prior to the application of tariffs, we find that there was very little effect on retail prices from these 2016 China-specific tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Imports of washing machines produced in Thailand and Vietnam increased sharply from essentially zero in 2015 to nearly 3.3 million units combined in 2017.
“This time, imports of washing machines produced in Thailand and Vietnam (the purple and yellow lines in Figure 2a) increased sharply, from essentially zero in 2015 to nearly 3.3 million units (combined) in 2017.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The 2016 China-specific tariffs had very little effect on retail prices.
“Although China accounted for a whopping 80 percent of washing machine imports into the United States prior to the application of tariffs, we find that there was very little effect on retail prices from these 2016 China-specific tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The paper's estimates of the tariff elasticity of consumer prices for the country-specific antidumping duties on Chinese production are positive but quite small.
“Our estimates of the tariff elasticity of consumer prices for the country-specific antidumping duties on Chinese production, though positive, are quite small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In the 12 months after the China antidumping duties, the CPI for laundry equipment declined by about 5 percent.
“The 12 months after the China antidumping duties saw a decline of about the same magnitude -roughly 5 percent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The safeguard tariffs raised the median price of washing machines by about 86 USD per unit.
“Our estimates indicate that the safeguard tariffs raised the median price of washing machines and clothes dryers by about 86 USD and 92 USD per unit, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Contemporaneous with the drop in imports from Korea and to a lesser extent Mexico was a substantial increase in imports from China.
“Contemporaneous with the drop in imports from Korea (and to a lesser extent, Mexico) was a substantial increase in imports from China (the red line in Figure 2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 2012 antidumping duties against Korea led to relocation of production to China.
“Perhaps surprisingly, the 2012 antidumping duties against Korea led to relocation of production to China, actually resulting in lower washer prices in the United States.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“The result of these antidumping duties, first on Mexican/Korean production in 2012 and later on Chinese production in 2016, was a shift in production to other countries while keeping the overall magnitude of U.S. imports roughly the same.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
Related-party transactions account for 85% of washing machine imports.
“Transactions between related parties account for 85% of washing machine imports (see Appendix B.1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The 2012 antidumping duties against Korea resulted in lower washer prices in the United States.
“Perhaps surprisingly, the 2012 antidumping duties against Korea led to relocation of production to China, actually resulting in lower washer prices in the United States.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“For example, we find either flat or increasing unit values of imported washers from Korea in response to the antidumping duties in 2012, but domestic prices in the United States fell as foreign production relocated to China.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
Imports from China fell from 3 million units per year in 2015 to roughly 300,000 units in 2017 following the 2016 antidumping duties.
“Imports from China fell from 3 million units per year in 2015 to roughly 300,000 units in 2017.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Shifts in Korean exports of washing machine parts follow the corresponding shifts in washing machine production.
“Figure 2b demonstrates that shifts in Korean exports of parts follow the corresponding shifts in washing machine production 11 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
US washer imports rose sharply in late 2017 and early 2018 as foreign producers hurried shipments ahead of the tariffs.
“As shown in the far right portion of Figure 2a, imports surged in late 2017 and early 2018 as foreign producers rushed to ship washing machines to the U.S. before the tariffs went into effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The total amount of tariff revenue collected was relatively small, aggregating to about 82 million USD annually.
“By comparison, the total amount of tariff revenue collected was relatively small, aggregating to about 82 million USD annually.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 2018 tariffs on nearly all source countries caused the price of washers to rise by nearly 12 percent.
“We find that in response to the 2018 tariffs on nearly all source countries, the price of washers rose by nearly 12 percent; the price of dryersa complementary good not subject to tariffs-increased by an equivalent amount.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“By contrast, we document a notable spike in washer prices in the months following the new 2018 global safeguard tariffs: about 12 percent more than the corresponding change in our control group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
The safeguard tariffs raised the median price of clothes dryers by about 92 USD per unit.
“Our estimates indicate that the safeguard tariffs raised the median price of washing machines and clothes dryers by about 86 USD and 92 USD per unit, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The 2016 antidumping duties against China led to only minor price movements.
“The 2016 antidumping duties against China-which accounted for the overwhelming majority of U.S. imports-led to minor price movements due to subsequent production relocation to other export platform countries.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“Although China accounted for a whopping 80 percent of washing machine imports into the United States prior to the application of tariffs, we find that there was very little effect on retail prices from these 2016 China-specific tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Findingown data
Once accounting for the effect on dryer prices, the paper's estimates imply pass-through to consumer prices of the 2018 safeguard tariffs between 107 and 226 percent.
“We find a much higher tariff elasticity of consumer prices for the global 2018 safeguard tariffs; once accounting for the effect on dryers prices, our estimates imply a pass-through to consumer prices of these safeguard tariffs of between 107 and 226 percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the two years following the 2012 antidumping duties, the quantity of imports from Korea fell by roughly 75 percent.
“In the two years following the new antidumping duties, the quantity of imports from Korea fell by roughly 75 percent (the blue line in Figure 2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The conventional approach yields elasticities implying complete pass-through of the Chinese antidumping duties to import prices from the countries on which the duties were levied.
“In contrast, the conventional approach yields elasticities implying complete pass-through of these antidumping duties to import prices from the countries on which the duties were levied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Using the level of shipments to construct an aggregate, the tariffs resulted in increased costs to consumers of just over 1.5 billion USD annually.
“Using the level of shipments to construct an aggregate, we calculate that these tariffs resulted in increased costs to consumers of just over 1.5 billion USD on an annual basis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The section 201 safeguard tariffs coincided with new domestic production, as LG Electronics and Samsung Electronics opened plants in the United States in 2018.
“the so-called section 201 tariffs coincided with new domestic production, as both LG Electronics and Samsung Electronics opened plants in the United States in 2018.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The robustness checks show that the estimated price effects of the China antidumping and Section 201 safeguard tariffs are somewhat larger than the baseline estimates, at least for the eight-month specifications.
“The results are robust, with the price effect of both the China antidumping and Safeguard tariffs increasing somewhat (at least, for the eight months estimates) than our baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Washer prices jumped soon after the safeguard tariffs took effect.
“Figure 4 demonstrates that prices of washing machines jump shortly after the safeguard tariffs were applied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
- Findingown data
There is little evidence that refrigerators or dishwashers had differential price effects from the 2018 safeguard tariffs.
“Reassuringly, we find little evidence of any differential price effects for refrigerators and dishwashers for the results pertaining to the 2018 safeguard tariffs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Table 1 shows that washers and dryers overall had notable price increases after the 2018 safeguard tariffs.
“The evidence in Table 1 demonstrate that, as a whole, washers and dryers experienced notable price increases following the safeguard tariffs of 2018.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
- Findingown data
The estimated small price increase for the 2016 China antidumping duties corresponds to a modest elasticity of 0.23 to 0.35.
“On the other hand, the small price increase we estimate for the 2016 antidumping duties against China results in a modest elasticity of 0.23 to 0.35.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The CPI for laundry equipment fell about 15% over the same July 2014 to January 2018 period.
“The CPI for laundry equipment (which is a price index for washers and dryers combined) declined by about 15 percent during this period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bureau of Labor Statistics
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The residualized price series track the CPI closely during the sample.
“The residualized price series patterns align well with the CPI during our sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Every major brand raised prices after the safeguard tariffs.
“The striking feature of Table 2 is that all major brands increased prices following the safeguard tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
- Findingown data
The high correlation facts for matched washer-dryer models hold across all major brands in the data.
“These facts are consistent across all major brands in our data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Dryer prices rose by an equivalent amount at the same time as washer prices after the safeguard tariffs.
“As noted above, equally dramatic is the relative price series for dryers which rises simultaneously to washers by an equivalent amount.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
- Findingown data
Dryer prices rose by about the same amount as washer prices even though dryers were not directly tariffed in that period.
“A more striking feature of Figure 4 however-and one that would not be evident without the more disaggregated data at our disposal-is that the price of dryers jumps by a similar magnitude as washers, despite not being directly affected by tariffs during this period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
- Findingown data
After adjusting for differential pre-trends, the China antidumping case produced only modest price changes.
“As shown in Table 1, after accounting for differential pre-trends, we find only modest price changes caused by the antidumping case against China.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
About three-quarters of the washers in the data have a matched dryer model, often with gas or electric versions.
“Roughly three-quarters of the washers in our data have a matched dryer model (often with either gas or electric versions).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The effective tariff on washing machine parts barely changed after the Section 201 safeguard tariffs.
“On further inspection, it turns out that the effective tariff on parts hardly changed following the Section 201 safeguard tariffs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Columns 1 and 2 estimates imply washer and dryer price increases of only 1.5% to 3.5% over four and eight months.
“The estimates in columns 1 and 2when controlling for model characteristics-suggest a price increase of only 1.5 to 3.5 percent for washers and dryers in the 4 and 8 months periods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During the shift from China to Vietnam/Thailand, import unit values were roughly equal.
“In contrast, the unit values tend to be roughly equivalent during the switch from China to Vietnam/Thailand (the blue line).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The five main washer brands-LG, Samsung, Whirlpool, Maytag, and G.E.-make up over 80% of washer and dryer observations in the raw data.
“These brands account for more than 80 percent of the total observations on washers and dryers in the raw data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Washer prices rose about 11% in the four to eight months after the safeguard tariffs.
“We find that the price of washers jumps by around 11 percent in the period four to eight months following the application of these tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
- Findingown data
The paper's price index estimate mirrors the CPI quite well.
“As shown in Figure 4, this estimate actually mirrors the CPI quite well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For electric matched washer-dryer models, more than 85 percent of weekly observations report the exact same dollar price.
“Focusing solely on the electric models, we find that in over 85 percent of our weekly observations, these matched models report the exact same dollar price.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over a long horizon, washer prices fell more than dryer prices or other appliance prices.
“As we know from Figure 4, over a long horizon, the prices of washers have fallen more than the prices of dryers or other appliances”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within the matched group, a washer can generally be paired with two dryers, one gas and one electric.
“In general, within the matched group, one washer can be matched with two dryers: one gas dryer and one electric dryer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The average effective tariff rate on all imported refrigerators and ranges rose only a little from October 2018.
“the average effective tariff rate against all imported refrigerators and ranges (the blue lines) moved up only slightly beginning in October of 2018.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Restricting to electric washers and electric dryers within matched pairs, the price correlation between washers and dryers is 0.967.
“After excluding the gas dryers and comparing only the electric washers and electric dryers within the matched group, we find the price correlation between washers and dryers is 0.967.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the Section 201 safeguard tariffs, the paper's elasticity estimates are higher than those implied by the unit-value method.
“On the other hand, for the Section 201 safeguard tariffs where tariffs affected nearly all imports, the elasticity estimates shown in this paper are actually higher than what would be implied from the method using unit values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The consumer cost per job created is roughly 817,000 USD annually.
“Combining these numbers together reveals a consumer cost per job of roughly 817,000”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 2018 safeguard tariffs had large effects on consumer prices.
“For the more global-oriented safeguard tariffs applied in 2018, we find large effects on consumer prices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Section 201 duties were applied unevenly across the countries of origin of imported washers.
“The figures demonstrate that the Section 201 tariffs were not applied uniformly across origin countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No new tariffs applied to dishwashers.
“Dishwashers were unaffected by any new tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Calculated duties before the 2018 global safeguard tariffs were negligible.
“As shown in Figure A2, the calculated duties before the global safeguard tariffs in 2018 were negligible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Less than 1 percent of washer parts imports were affected by the Section 201 tariffs.
“the share of washer parts affected by these Section 201 tariffs was trivial-less than 1 percent of the total”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Table 4 shows that unit-value based regression results often differ markedly from those using the alternative metric.
“Table 4 demonstrates that the results from the unit-value based regression often differ markedly from those using the alternative metric.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The related-party import shares by country and year align with the shifts in production by the major firms shown in other figures.
“Figure A1 shows these related-party shares by country and year; the patterns evident in this figure align with the shifts in production by these major firms shown in other figures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The estimated increase in consumer costs is 1.542 billion USD per year.
“The result is an increase of 1.542 billion USD in consumer costs per year.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the China antidumping duties, the conventional unit-value approach overstates the price increase relative to the paper's retail-price estimates.
“A similar pattern applies to the China antidumping duties: The conventional approach using unit values overstates the increase in prices relative to our estimates based on detailed retail prices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The imports mainly affected by the tariffs came from Thailand and Vietnam.
“As shown in Figure A4a, the imports primarily affected were from Thailand and Vietnam.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 2016 antidumping duties on Chinese production had little effect on consumer prices.
“Using detailed micro-level data on retail prices, we find that the 2016 antidumping duties on Chinese production had little effect on consumer prices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Total annual tariff revenue from these tariffs is 82.2 million USD.
“Hence, a total annual tariff revenue of 82.2 million USD from these tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Household dishwashers, the remaining major appliance in the data, faced no additional tariffs over the study period.
“Household dishwashers, the other major appliance in our data, were never subject to additional tariffs during the period we study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Two sets of antidumping duties against producers in Korea/Mexico and China led to large subsequent shifts in trade and production patterns.
“Two sets of antidumping duties against producers in Korea/Mexico and China led to large subsequent shifts in trade and production patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The average effective tariff rate paid on washers from Thailand and Vietnam matched the statutory rates announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce, 20 percent rising to 50 percent.
“Consistent with the fact that all imports from Thailand and Vietnam were subject to the safeguard duties, the average effective rate for these countries aligns with the statutory rates announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce (20 percent, increasing to 50 percent).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The volume of washer imports falling outside the Section 201 scope remained large.
“While Figure A4d confirms that Section 201 imports reached the 1.2 million-unit quota in October of 2018, it also demonstrates that the quantity of imports excluded from the scope is still substantial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The average tariff rate across all washer parts imports was essentially flat.
“the average tariff rate across all washer parts (shown in the red line) was essentially unchanged”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the five major brands, 75.3 percent of the 571 washer models have a matching dryer.
“We find that among the washers of the five major brands (LG, Samsung, Whirlpool, Maytag, G.E.), 75.3 percent of the 571 models have matching dryers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A very large share of U.S. imports of household laundry equipment occurs between related parties.
“As shown in Table A4, a very large share of U.S. imports of this category occurs between related parties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Imports subject to Section 201 reached the 1.2 million-unit quota in October 2018.
“While Figure A4d confirms that Section 201 imports reached the 1.2 million-unit quota in October of 2018, it also demonstrates that the quantity of imports excluded from the scope is still substantial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The tariff rate on washer parts imports covered by Section 201 rose sharply in mid-2018.
“the tariff rate of washer parts imports subject to Section 201 tariffs (the blue line) did indeed jump in mid-2018”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Taking the effects on both goods together, the overall tariff elasticity of consumer prices is above 100 percent for the 2018 safeguard tariffs.
“Taking the effects on both goods together, the overall tariff elasticity of consumer prices is above 100 percent for the 2018 safeguard tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The paper provides evidence that negative pass-through occurred after the 2012 antidumping duties on Korea and Mexico.
“We provide evidence that this was the case following the antidumping duties on Korea and Mexico in 2012.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Washers imported from China and Mexico were not subject to the Section 201 duties.
“In contrast, as shown in Figure A4b, washers from China and Mexico were unaffected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The average effective rate on Korean imports reflects that only a fraction of those imports faced the new duties.
“The average effective rate paid by Korean imports reflects the fact that only some portion were subject to the new duties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Antidumping duties against China raised dryer prices by about 1.4% to 3.8% over 4 to 8 months.
“Dryers 0.0141 0.0228* 0.0203** 0.0375*** (0.0095) (0.0111) (0.0076) (0.0084)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Antidumping duties against China raised washer prices by roughly 2.3% to 4.9% over 4 to 8 months, depending on whether model characteristics or model fixed effects are used as controls.
“Antidumping against China Washers 0.0231 0.0406** 0.0285** 0.0486*** (0.0126) (0.0145) (0.0102) (0.0116)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The importance of foreign trade zones for washing machine production destined for the U.S. market increased over the period studied.
“The increasing importance of FTZs for washing machine production destined for the U.S. market is evident in Figure A9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 2018 safeguard tariffs raised dryer prices by about 7.4% to 9.3% over 4 to 8 months.
“Dryers 0.0741*** 0.0765*** 0.0825*** 0.0929*** (0.0103) (0.0126) (0.0078) (0.0078)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
During the 2017 global safeguard investigation, Samsung and LG both announced plans to start US production of large residential washing machines.
“In the midst of the global safeguard investigation of 2017, both Samsung and LG announced plans to begin U.S. production of large residential washing machines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Samsung (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites LG Electronics (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Given patents on washer technology and strong market power associated with branding, the washing machine market is best characterized as non-competitive.
“Given the presence of patents on washer technology and strong market power associated with branding, the washing machine market is best characterized as non-competitive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The minor price movements from the 2016 China antidumping duties are explained by subsequent production relocation to other export platform countries.
“The 2016 antidumping duties against China-which accounted for the overwhelming majority of U.S. imports-led to minor price movements due to subsequent production relocation to other export platform countries.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · hedged
“This could be explained by the relative ease by which large foreign brands (Samsung, LG) appeared to subsequently shift production to Vietnam and Thailand, with coinciding increases in washing machine parts exports from Korea to these countries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · hedged
- Interpretationreasoning
The potential for production relocation leads to a non-monotone response of prices to tariff changes.
“Indeed, as we show theoretically in section 2, the potential for production relocation leads to a response of prices to tariff changes that is non-monotone.”
- Also stated in: § 2 A Simple Model of Production Relocation, Prices, and Tariffs · plain
“Hence, as depicted in Figure 1d, the presence of fixed costs and production relocation imply that the effect of tariffs on U.S. prices is non-monotone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 2 A Simple Model of Production Relocation, Prices, and Tariffs · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
Production relocation plays a prominent role in the differences between the paper's estimates and conventional estimates.
“We argue that production relocation plays a prominent role in the differences in these estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The paper's findings illustrate relocation of production to third markets as export platforms in response to bilateral tariff changes.
“Consistent with the predictions of models of export platform FDI (e.g., Yeaple 2003; Ekholm, Forslid and Markusen 2007; Tintelnot 2017), our findings illustrate the relocation of production to third markets as export platforms in response to bilateral tariff changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
In the model, if the U.S. government charges a per-unit tariff on washing machine imports, U.S. consumers pay the foreign monopolist price plus the tariff.
“If the U.S. government charges a tariff on washing machine imports of τ per unit of washer imported, the U.S. consumers pay the foreign monopolist price plus the tariff.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: There is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The importer is a perfectly competitive intermediary that sells washers to U.S. consumers, so no mark-up is added to the tariff.
- Premisenone given
A group of developing countries was excluded from the Section 201 tariff as long as each country's share of total imports stayed below a threshold.
“Imports from a set of developing countries were also excluded from the tariff, provided that the country's share of total imports remains below a certain threshold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The paper's measure of the tariff elasticity of consumer prices may differ in sign and magnitude from conventional pass-through estimates based on regressing country-specific import price changes on country-specific tariff changes.
“We find that our measure of the tariff elasticity of consumer prices may differ in sign and magnitude from conventional pass-through estimates which are based on a regression of country-specific import price changes on country-specific tariff changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Selected washer components also faced a quota-based duty: in the first year, imported parts exceeding 50,000 units would incur an extra 50% tariff.
“Select imported components of washing machines were also subject to a tariff rate quota: in the first year any imported parts above 50,000 units would be subject to an additional tariff of 50 percent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Absent additional factors, the reported increase in domestic employment of roughly 1,800 workers attributed to the policy would result in an average annual cost to consumers of over 815,000 USD per job created after netting out collected tariff revenues.
“Absent additional factors, the reports of increases in domestic employment attributed to this policy of roughly 1,800 workers would result in an average annual cost to consumers of over 815,000 USD per job created (after netting out the collected tariff revenues).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The safeguard's final form set a 20% duty for up to 1.2 million washer units imported annually, with a 50% duty on any units beyond that cap.
“The final result, published as a presidential proclamation in January 2018, was a tariff rate quota: a tariff rate of 20 percent on the first 1.2 million imported units (per year) entering the United States, with all subsequent units subject to a 50 percent tariff.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Under imperfect competition, the price effect of tariffs may be non-monotone when production relocation to third countries is taken into account.
“The goal of this section is to illustrate theoretically that under imperfect competition the price effect of tariffs may be non-monotone when production relocation to third countries is taken into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: There is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Consumer preferences for washers imply a constant elasticity of substitution demand function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The foreign supplier has constant marginal cost in each available production location.
- Interpretationreasoning
Under the option of production relocation, the effect of the tariff on U.S. consumer prices is less than in the case without relocation.
“Note, however, that under the option of production relocation the effect of the tariff on U.S. consumer prices is less than in the example of Figure 1a.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: There is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The foreign supplier has constant marginal cost in each available production location.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the Figure 1b example, the fixed cost to establish production in countries C and V is the same.
- Study design and conductown data
Ranges were selected as the control product group because they are closest to washers and dryers in steel content.
“The product category closest to washers and dryers with respect to steel content is ranges, and we therefore choose it as the control product group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The unit-value evidence for the Korea/Mexico antidumping case is suggestive rather than conclusive.
“While we demonstrate the theoretical underpinnings of a negative price response to tariff changes (or negative rate of tariff pass-through) above, the evidence from unit values for the Korea/Mexico antidumping case is more suggestive than conclusive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The conventional approach assumes away substitution, especially substitution to other countries as firms relocate production.
“First, the tight country link between tariff changes and trade prices assumes away substitution and in particular the substitution to other countries as firms relocate production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The steel-price increase is differenced out because it also affects ranges and the other appliances.
“Note also that the effect of the increase in steel prices is differenced-out, as it also applies to ranges (the control group) and the other appliances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The section 4.2 results are robust to alternative assumptions.
“We briefly discuss a number of additional results to indicate that our results from section 4.2 are robust to alternative assumptions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The conventional method does not reflect the full basket of prices available to consumers, including both domestic and imported products.
“A second concern with the conventional method is that it doesn't reflect the full basket of prices available to consumers (both domestically produced and imported products).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
For imported products, the full effect of tariff changes on consumer prices depends on markup adjustments.
“Even for imported products, the full effect of tariff changes on consumer products will depend on markup adjustments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Tariff changes can affect prices through channels other than same-country import price changes.
“At a basic level, Figure 3 makes clear that the price effects of tariff changes are not restricted to same-country changes in import prices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The data provide clear evidence of complementarities between washers and dryers.
“Taken as a whole, there is clear evidence of complementarities between washers and dryers in our data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
All appliances were similarly exposed to the input-cost changes.
“Our strategy allows us to isolate the particular effects of washing machine tariffs given the fact that all appliances were similarly affected by these changes in inputs costs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The richer retail price data allow calculation of a tariff elasticity of consumer prices that at least partially overcomes the shortcomings of the conventional approach.
“The richer data on retail prices at our disposal allows us to calculate the tariff elasticity of consumer prices that, at least partially, overcomes the shortcomings of the conventional approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
That unchanged parts tariff is consistent with the provision being aimed at stopping foreign firms from importing semi-assembled pieces to avoid duties on complete machines.
“consistent with this provision being a targeted measure to prevent foreign firms from importing semi-assembled pieces as a way of getting around the tariffs on fully assembled machines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The welfare effect of tariffs hinges on how much of them consumers ultimately bear.
“The overall welfare impact of tariffs depends on the extent to which they are passed on to consumers; yet, the paucity of consumer-facing prices has limited research in this critical area of trade policy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
It is plausible that the firms in the sample split the price effects of new tariffs between washers and dryers in order to maintain the convention of identical prices.
“As such, it seems plausible that the firms in our sample chose to split the effects of new tariffs on prices between washers and dryers, maintaining the convention of identical prices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It seems likely that firms spread the price increase across both washers and dryers in order to keep retail prices similar between matching models sold as pairs.
“It seems likely that firms spread out the increase in prices across both washers and dryers in an effort to keep the retail prices similar between matching models sold as pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The conventional methodology will miss or misinterpret the indirect effects of production relocation on the prices consumers actually face.
“This methodology will then miss or misinterpret the indirect effects of production relocation as they relate to the actual prices faced by consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Equation (6) more accurately captures the indirect price effects of tariffs by measuring aggregate price and tariff changes separately and using lagged import weights to reflect the effective tariff burden facing firms.
“Equation (6) will more accurately capture the indirect price effects of tariffs by measuring the aggregate price and tariff changes separately, while using lagged import weights to reflect the effective tariff burden facing firms and therefore applicable to the initial price level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The Gap Intelligence raw data contain weekly price and product-characteristic records at the retailer-model level from March 2013 through December 2018.
“The raw dataset contains weekly data entries of price and product characteristics at the retailer-model level from March 2013 to December 2018.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since the finished-product tariff rate is lower, the firm records the import for consumption under the washing machine product code.
“As the tariff rate on the finished product is lower, the firm records the import for consumption under the final product code classification (as a washing machine).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For washing machines, foreign trade zone production would let a U.S. manufacturer bring in components with little or no tariff.
“Hence, for the case of washing machines, an FTZ would allow a U.S. manufacturer to import the components of washing machines with little or no associated tariffs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Foreign trade zone production creates a further possible gap between general imports and imports for consumption, because such production lies outside the U.S. customs border.
“FTZ production introduces another potential discrepancy between these two definitions, as FTZ production exists outside the customs border of the United States.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The short-lived price rise probably reflects a shift in the mix of imports toward more expensive models as firms hurried shipments into the United States ahead of the tariff increase.
“One likely explanation for the brief increase in average prices is a shift in the composition of imports towards higher-priced models, as firms rushed to move imports into the U.S. before the tariff increase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The full impact on consumer prices is realized only when accounting for the equivalent and simultaneous increase in the price of dryers, a complementary good not subject to tariffs.
“However, the full impact to consumer prices is only realized once we account for the equivalent and simultaneous increase in the price of dryers, a complementary good not subject to tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The most probable reason Chinese and Mexican washers escaped the duties is that the products imported from those countries consisted entirely of the excluded washer types.
“Given that the section 201 ruling did not provide for country-level exclusions for these cases, the most likely explanation is that the composition of products imported from these countries (entirely) fell under the set of excluded products identified above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Section 201 ruling contained no country-level exclusions covering China and Mexico.
- Premisereasoning
Unlike the Section 201 tariffs, the Section 301 tariffs applied only to China.
“the other obvious difference with the Section 201 tariffs was that these tariffs were targeted at China alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The Section 201 Import Safeguard tariff included exclusions, so not all imports of the relevant HS product codes were subject to new tariffs in early 2018.
“The Section 201 Import Safeguard tariff included a number of exclusions, such that not all imports of the relevant HS product codes were subject to new tariffs in early 2018.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Under foreign trade zone production, imported components are recorded as general imports but not as imports for consumption, since they are processed inside the zone and never cross the customs border.
“in FTZ production the imported component parts will enter the country recorded as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If a tariff induces a firm to shift to a location with overall lower production costs, consumer prices could actually decrease, amounting to negative tariff pass-through.
“Indeed, if the tariff induces the firm to shift to a location with overall lower costs of production, consumer prices could actually decrease (amounting to a negative tariff rate pass-through).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Other appliances were included in the price analysis so that price movements caused by higher input costs from the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs would be accounted for.
“The inclusion of other appliances in our analysis of price changes following the Section 201 Safeguard tariffs serves to account for any price changes attributed to higher input costs coming from the Section 232”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The washer-parts provision of the Section 201 investigation was probably intended as a preventive measure against circumvention of the washer duties.
“this provision of the section 201 investigation was more likely put into place as a preventative measure to guard against the avoidance of the washer tariffs themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A simple theory suggests that the endogenous firm-level response to targeted country-specific tariffs is to relocate production, thereby moderating the effects of the trade policy on consumer prices.
“We sketch out some simple theory whereby the endogenous firm-level response to targeted country-specific tariffs is to relocate production, hence moderating the effects of the trade policy to consumer prices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 43
- May combine two claims. 80
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to Ashenfelter, Hosken and Weinberg (2013), Whirlpool and Maytag together pre-merger accounted for 60 percent of total revenue for washing machines and 65 percent for clothes dryers.
“according to research on the effects of this merger in Ashenfelter, Hosken and Weinberg (2013), Whirlpool and Maytag together (pre-merger) accounted for 60 percent of total revenue for washing machines, and 65 percent for clothes dryers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashenfelter, Hosken and Weinberg (2013) source
The available Web Appendix passages describe product characteristics used as controls for washers and dryers; they do not give pre-merger revenue shares. Searches for the claimed 60 percent and 65 percent figures and for combined market shares returned no passage addressing those figures. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLarge firms respond to competitors' cost changes induced by exchange rate changes.
“Using Belgian manufacturing data, Amiti, Itskhoki and Konings (2016) document that large firms respond to competitors cost changes induced by exchange rate changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Amiti, Itskhoki and Konings (2016) source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter the tariffs, US washer imports dropped sharply in February and March 2018, then increased through September 2018 just before the 1.2 million unit quota was hit and the duty rose to 50%.
“Imports subsequently fell sharply in February and March of 2018, rising again through September 2018 just before the quota limit of 1.2 million imported units was reached and subsequent tariffs rose to 50 percent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CPI for laundry equipment jumped in the months following the section 201 safeguard tariffs and was up by about 9 percent by February 2019.
“Conversely, the index jumped in the months following the section 201 safeguard tariffs and was up by about 9 percent by February 2019.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn February 2012, the USITC issued a ruling recommending antidumping measures; in July 2012, the Commerce Department announced import duties ranging from 9.2 to 82.4 percent on several firms.
“In February 2012, the USITC issued a ruling that recommended antidumping measures; in July of that year, the Commerce Department announced import duties ranging from 9.2 to 82.4 percent on several firms (Department of Commerce (2012)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Department of Commerce (2012)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the 2018 tariffs on washers, after accounting for dryers and domestic brand price increases, the estimated tariff elasticity of consumer prices is between 110 and 230 percent, or between 107 and 226 percent in the introduction.
“Factoring in the effect of dryers and price increases by domestic brands, our estimates for the 2018 tariffs on washers imply a tariff elasticity of consumer prices of between 110 and 230 percent.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · hedged
“We find a much higher tariff elasticity of consumer prices for the global 2018 safeguard tariffs; once accounting for the effect on dryers prices, our estimates imply a pass-through to consumer prices of these safeguard tariffs of between 107 and 226 percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe washer quota limit was reached on October 22, 2018.
“According to Commodity Status Reports published by the U.S. Customs Bureau, the quota limit on washers was reached on October 22, 2018.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExports of washing machine parts to China jumped in 2013 and 2014 before falling back in 2016 and 2017 as exports of parts to Thailand and Vietnam rose.
“Exports of parts to China jump in 2013 and 2014 before falling back in 2016 and 2017 as exports of parts to Thailand and Vietnam rise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe 2012 and 2016 antidumping duties shifted production to other countries while keeping the overall magnitude of U.S. imports roughly the same.
“The result of these antidumping duties, first on Mexican/Korean production in 2012 and later on Chinese production in 2016, was a shift in production to other countries while keeping the overall magnitude of U.S. imports roughly the same.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn February 2016, the USITC issued a ruling in favor of antidumping measures, and final antidumping duties announced by the Commerce Department ranged from 38.4 percent for LG to 57.4 percent for Samsung.
“In February 2016, the USITC issued another ruling in favor of antidumping measures, and final antidumping duties announced by the Commerce Deparmtent ranged from 38.4 percent (LG) to 57.4 percent (Samsung) (Department of Commerce (2016)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Department of Commerce (2016)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn the 12 months following the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties, the CPI for laundry equipment declined by about 5 percent and continued falling thereafter.
“In the 12 months following the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties, the CPI for laundry equipment actually declined by about 5 percent and continued falling thereafter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn response to the 2012 antidumping duties, unit values of imported washers from Korea were either flat or increasing, but domestic prices in the United States fell as foreign production relocated to China.
“For example, we find either flat or increasing unit values of imported washers from Korea in response to the antidumping duties in 2012, but domestic prices in the United States fell as foreign production relocated to China.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningOverall Korean washing machine parts exports rose nearly 60 percent between 2010 and 2016, consistent with reduced parts used in Korea for washing machine production for export.
“In addition, overall Korean washing machine parts exports (not shown) rise nearly 60 percent between 2010 and 2016, a fact consistent with the reduced amount of parts used in Korea for washing machine production for export.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe five national retailers-JC Penney, Best Buy, Lowes, Sears, and Home Depot-account for over 50% of observations in the data.
“which together account for more than 50 percent of the observations in the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMaytag raised washer prices about 14% and dryer prices 17% to 20%.
“Maytag raised washer prices by about 14 percent and dryer prices between 17 to 20 percent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDryers, which were not subject to tariffs during the period, experienced price changes nearly identical to those of washers, both in aggregate and for each brand separately.
“A surprising feature of the results presented in section 4.2 is that dryers-excluded from any tariffs during this period-experienced price changes that were nearly identical to that of washers.This is true in the aggregate (Figure 1) as well as for each brand separately (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningUsing median pre-period prices of 749 USD for washers and 809 USD for dryers, the tariff-attributable increases were 86 USD per washer and 92 USD per dryer.
“Multiplying these estimates by the median pre-period price of washers (749 USD per unit) and dryers (809 USD per unit) yields the dollar increase in price attributable to these tariffs on washers and dryers was 86 USD per unit and 92 USD per unit, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Section 201 safeguard elasticity estimates are 1.25 to 2.26 using the trade-weighted average tariff increase, or 0.57 to 1.07 using only the maximum possible rate.
“Finally, the estimates for the section 201 safeguard tariffs are considerably higher: 1.25 to 2.26 using the trade weighted average tariff increase, or 0.57 to 1.07 if we only use the maximum possible rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLG raised prices by 8% over four months and about 13% over eight months for both washers and dryers.
“LG raised prices over four months by eight percent and over 8 months by about 13 percent for both washers and dryers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Pearson rank correlation of sales between a brand's washers and dryers at a given retailer is high, between 0.9 and 0.95, and is typically lower, between 0.3 and 0.9, for other appliance pairs.
“As shown in Appendix Figure A7, the Pearson rank correlation of sales for a brand's washer and dryers at a given retailer is quite high, 0.9 to 0.95, depending on the retailer, and typically lower, 0.3 to 0.9, for other appliances pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataRefrigerator prices appeared to grow differently from range prices before and after July 2016.
“For example, it appears that refrigerator prices (Figure 5a) were growing differentially from ranges before and after July 2016.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor ranges, Chinese imports were about 10%, implying an effective tariff increase below one percentage point.
“For ranges, the Chinese import share was about 10 percent, and hence the increase in the effective tariff rate was less than one percentage point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom July 2014 to January 2018, Gap Intelligence data show washer prices falling about 20% and dryer prices falling about 7%.
“For example, from July 2014 to January 2018 (shortly before the introduction of the safeguard tariffs in February 2018), the Gap Intelligence data suggests a decline in washer prices of about 20 percent and a decline in the price of dryers of about 7 percent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataReplicating the baseline for all brands, brick-and-mortar retailers, and store-count weights yields robust results, with both China antidumping and safeguard price effects somewhat larger.
“Appendix Table A9 replicates our baseline results from Table 1 but for all brands, brick-and-mortar retailers, and where each retailer receives a weight corresponding to the number of brick-and-mortar stores in the U.S. The results are robust, with the price effect of both the China antidumping and Safeguard tariffs increasing somewhat”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSamsung raised washer prices by 15% to 17% and dryer prices by about 10%.
“Samsung increased prices by 15 to 17 percent for washers and about 10 percent for dryers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe estimate for the 2012 Korea/Mexico antidumping duties indicates a decline in prices and therefore a negative elasticity.
“Our suggestive estimate for the 2012 antidumping duties against Korea and Mexico indicates a decline in prices, and hence a negative elasticity, consistent with the theory shown in Figure 1c .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith model fixed effects in columns 3 and 4, estimates for all four appliances rise and become statistically significant relative to ranges.
“In columns 3 and 4-when utilizing model fixed effects as controls-the estimates for all four appliances increase and become statistically significant relative to the price levels of ranges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTable 3 shows a wide range of the consumer elasticity of tariffs.
“What is evident in Table 3 is a wide range of this consumer elasticity of tariffs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe estimated price effects of the 2018 Section 201 safeguard tariffs are much larger than those of the China antidumping case.
“By contrast, and consistent with the preliminary evidence from Figure 5b, the estimated price effects of the Section 201 safeguard tariffs are much more striking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhirlpool raised washer prices by 13% to 17%, and its dryer prices rose at least as much.
“Depending on the time horizon, Whirlpool increased washer prices between 13 to 17 percent, with dryer prices increasing at least as much.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataImport unit values fell after the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties as production moved to China.
“Figure 3 reveals that unit values decreased following the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties as production relocated to China”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataImports identified under the Section 201 rate provision code have applied tariff rates matching the statute, but the average effective tariff rate across all washer imports is significantly lower.
“While the imports identified under the Section 201 rate provision code display an applied tariff rate that matches those specified in the statute, the average effective tariff rate across all washer imports is significantly lower.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe results show no clear domestic-versus-foreign brand split, with increases ranging from 5% to 17%.
“There is no clear distinction between domestic and foreign brands in these results, all within a range of 5 and 17 percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataG.E. had smaller increases, about 7% for washers and about 10% for dryers.
“G.E. had lower price increases of around 7 percent for washers and about 10 percent for dryers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBefore the Section 301 tariffs, Chinese imports made up about 17% of refrigerators, implying a trade-weighted tariff increase below two percentage points.
“Prior to these tariffs, the Chinese import share for refrigerators was around 17 percent, leading to an increase in the trade-weighted tariff rate of less than two percentage points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMatched washer-dryer models have a very high price correlation, above 0.95, and a price-change correlation of 0.82.
“Hence, the price correlation between these matched models is very high-over 0.95-while the correlation of price changes is 0.82.23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn 86.3 percent of matched observations, the washer and its matching dryer have exactly the same price.
“for 86.3 percent of the matched observations, the washer has exactly the same price as the matching dryer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAverage steel content is about 90 pounds for washing machines and about 127.5 pounds for the electric and gas ranges used as controls, so the two are fairly close.
“the steel content of washing machines is indeed quite close to the appliance used as our control of electric/gas ranges (average of 90 lbs vs 127.5 lbs)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Steel Recycling Institute and the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRefrigerators contain somewhat more steel than washers and dishwashers somewhat less.
“The other appliances-refrigerators and dishwashers-have steel content that is slightly higher and lower, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Steel Recycling Institute and the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhirlpool's main assembly operations produce in a foreign trade zone, suggesting that imported components are an important part of its U.S. operations.
“Although we lack information on such linkages, the main assembly operations of Whirlpool produce in a foreign trade zone (see Appendix B.9), suggesting that imported components are an important piece of their U.S. operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn brand-specific difference-in-difference estimates, the 2018 safeguard tariffs are associated with higher washer prices for all five major brands at four months, with coefficients from 0.0537 to 0.1799, each statistically significant.
“Safeguard tariffs 2018 Washers 0.1799*** 0.1464*** 0.1427*** 0.0913* 0.0537*** 0.0807*** 0.1420*** 0.1544*** 0.0885*** 0.0859***”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross all brands in brick-and-mortar stores, the 2018 safeguard tariffs are associated with washer price increases of 0.0868 at four months and 0.0908 at eight months, both significant at the 0.1 percent level.
“Safeguard tariffs 2018 Washers 0.0868*** 0.0908*** 0.0843*** 0.1022***”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenForeign producers advertised about 1,600 new jobs following new U.S. production plans, and Whirlpool indicated it hired 200 additional workers because of the safeguard tariffs.
“As indicated above, foreign producers advertised new jobs on the order of 1,600 following new production plans in the United States; Whirlpool, on the other hand, indicated they hired 200 additional workers as a result of the safeguard tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong the appliances sold by these retailers, washers and dryers are especially tightly linked.
“there is an especially tight connection between washers and dryers among the set of appliances for these retailers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnit values of the affected imports rose briefly but fell back by the time the tariffs were assessed in April/May, averaging 5 to 10 percent below their pre-tariff levels.
“Although prices increase briefly for two of the countries, by the time tariffs are actually assessed (in April/May, see Figure A4c) these prices fall back; averaging between 5 and 10 percent lower than before tariffs were applied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe annual shipment numbers used are roughly 10 million washing machines and 7.7 million clothes dryers.
“These numbers are roughly 10 million washing machines and 7.7 million clothes dryers.29”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBefore the Section 301 tariffs, China accounted for 18 percent of refrigerator imports, 10 percent of range imports, and 30 percent of dishwasher imports.
“Prior to the Section 301 tariffs, the Chinese share of total imports for refrigerators, ranges, and dishwashers was 18 percent, 10 percent, and 30 percent, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCalculated duties from February 2018 to January 2019 were just under 82 million USD for washing machines and about 355,000 USD for washing machine parts.
“According to data available on their website, calculated duties from February 2018 to January 2019 amounted to just under 82 million USD for washing machines, and about 355,000 USD for washing machine parts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuties did not jump until roughly May 2018, despite announcements indicating collection would begin in February.
“Interestingly, the figure shows that duties didn't jump until roughly May of 2018, despite the fact that announcements indicated duties would be collected beginning in February.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlmost all washer imports from Vietnam and Thailand faced the Section 201 duties, while only part of the imports from Korea did.
“Nearly all imports from Vietnam and Thailand were subject to these duties, whereas imports from Korea were only partially affected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenGas dryers typically carry higher prices than electric dryers.
“Gas dryers are usually priced higher than the electric dryers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn a partial equilibrium setting, the estimated increased annual consumer costs are around 1.5 billion USD, or roughly 820,000 USD per job created.
“Despite the increase in domestic production and employment, the costs of these 2018 tariffs are substantial: in a partial equilibrium setting, we estimate increased annual consumer costs of around 1.5 billion USD, or roughly 820,000 USD per job created.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe unit-value elasticity implies full pass-through to import prices after the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties, while consumer prices actually fell during that period.
“The elasticity based on unit values implies full pass-through (increases) to import prices following the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties, whereas the evidence cited above shows that prices to consumers actually fell during this period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA large gap between imports for consumption and general imports of washing machines emerged in 2014, and roughly all of that discrepancy is due to a jump in the Cleveland Customs District.
“As shown in Figure A9a, a large gap emerges between imports for consumption and general imports in 2014; Figure A9b demonstrates that roughly all of this discrepancy owes to a jump in the Cleveland Customs District.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor washers only, the tariff elasticity of consumer prices is 0.23 for the China antidumping case, 1.25 for the trade-weighted average safeguard case, and 0.57 for the maximum safeguard case.
“Washers Only | N/A | 0.23 | 1.25 | 0.57”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenUnder the antidumping duties against China, washer prices rose significantly for Maytag and G.E. but not for Whirlpool, LG, or Samsung.
“Washers | -0.0306 (0.0283) | -0.0345 (0.0360) | 0.1420** 0.1897*** (0.0444) (0.0530) | 0.0098 (0.0387) | -0.0110 (0.0491) | 0.0830* (0.0413) | 0.0573 (0.0498) | -0.0020 (0.0180) | 0.0235 (0.0240) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe 2018 safeguard tariffs raised washer prices substantially, by about 7% to 9.5% in the all-brands/all-retailers specification and about 11% to 12% in the specification with model characteristics or model fixed effects as controls.
“Safeguard tariffs 2018 Washers 0.0695*** 0.0807*** 0.0760*** 0.0949*** (0.0114) (0.0137) (0.0096) (0.0095)”
- Also stated in: § Figure A21: Total Number of Available Models by Brand · plain
“Washers | 0.1092*** 0.1151*** 0.1104*** 0.1185*** (0.0138) (0.0181) (0.0111) (0.0118) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Figure A21: Total Number of Available Models by Brand · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe correlation of average prices across all models within a brand/merchant is 0.87, and the washer-dryer correlation of average price changes across all models within a brand/merchant is 0.74.
“The correlation of average prices across all models within a brand/merchant is 0.87.The washer-dryer correlation of average price changes across all models within a brand/merchant is 0.74.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 2018 safeguard tariffs did not raise refrigerator or dishwasher prices; the estimated effects were near zero or negative.
“Refrigerators -0.0115 -0.0230* -0.0148** -0.0254*** (0.0079) (0.0108) (0.0049) (0.0053) Dishwashers -0.0023 -0.0073 0.0019 0.0087 (0.0088) (0.0123) (0.0060) (0.0074)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningIn the model, if the tariff increase is large enough that revenues under import tariffs on K fall sufficiently compared to revenues from producing in C, the monopolist switches production to C, and U.S. consumer prices for washing machines fall in response to import restrictions on K.
“the foreign monopolist switches the production location in response to the tariff and produces in C instead.”
- Also stated in: § 2 A Simple Model of Production Relocation, Prices, and Tariffs · hedged
“Quite interestingly, as a consequence, the prices U.S. consumers would pay for washing machines would fall in response to the import restrictions on K.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: There is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The foreign supplier has constant marginal cost in each available production location.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The fixed cost of foreign production is higher than domestic production.
- Also stated in: § 2 A Simple Model of Production Relocation, Prices, and Tariffs · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe examples illustrate the importance of analyzing jointly the production and price effects from import restrictions.
“These examples illustrate the importance of analyzing jointly the production and price effects from import restrictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe washer and component duties began in February 2018 and were set to end after three years.
“These tariff rates went into effect in February 2018 (for washing machines and their component parts) and are scheduled to expire after three years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 2006, Whirlpool acquired Maytag, substantially increasing concentration of washing machines and clothes dryers.
“In 2006, the Whirlpool Corporation (”
- Also stated in: § 3 Import Restrictions and Changes in Trade Flows · plain
“This merger substantially increased the concentration of both washing machines and clothes dryers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3 Import Restrictions and Changes in Trade Flows · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe example in Figure 1c would not occur in a competitive market where new firms from country C could enter on their own; in the absence of tariffs, production would never occur in country K.
“It is important to point out, that the example depicted in Figure 1c would not occur in a competitive market where new firms from country C could enter on their own.In that case, in the absence of tariffs, production would never occur in country K.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExport unit values may reflect transfer pricing strategies to reduce tariff costs for trade between related parties, and therefore may not accurately characterize the price change faced by consumers.
“In addition, export unit values (measured at the border) may reflect transfer pricing strategies to reduce the costs of tariffs for trade between related parties.They therefore may not accurately characterize the price change faced by consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe paper reports evidence pointing to negative pass-through of tariffs and hence increased consumer surplus from the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties.
“Although our sample of microlevel prices does not overlap with the Korea/Mexico antidumping duties, we report evidence -a drop in the unit values from subsequent production in China, along with declines in the CPI index -pointing to a negative pass-through of tariffs and hence increased consumer surplus from these tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProduction relocation effects, price changes by domestic brands, and price changes of complementary goods all contribute to differences between the paper's measure and conventional pass-through estimates.
“Production relocation effects, price changes by domestic brands, and price changes of complementary goods all contribute to the differences between these measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenImported washing machines occupied less than ten percent of U.S. sales during the period around the Whirlpool/Maytag merger.
“Imported washing machines occupied a small share-less than ten percent-of U.S. sales during this time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFor goods subject to antidumping duties, the Section 201 dutiable value was the product's value before any antidumping duties were assessed.
“For products subject to antidumping duties, the dutiable value (for Section 201 tariffs) would be the value of the imported product prior to any antidumping duties being assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe paper's findings are related to work by Ruhl (2014), who finds a large aggregate impact of U.S. antidumping policies.
“Our findings are also related to work by Ruhl (2014), who finds a large aggregate impact of U.S. antidumping policies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ruhl (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFirms shifted production following each new trade policy-first from Mexico/Korea to China, then to Thailand/Vietnam, and finally to the U.S.-to avoid paying import tariffs.
“To summarize, firms shifted production following each new trade policy-first from Mexico/Korea to China, then to Thailand/Vietnam, and finally to the U.S.-to avoid paying import tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningCanada was excluded from the Section 201 safeguard tariffs because its imports were not a substantial share and did not contribute to the USITC's injury finding.
“Canada was excluded, as the final announcement indicated that Canadian imports do not account for a substantial share of the total and do not contribute to the injury identified by the USITC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTransfer pricing motives would typically lead to lower pass-through estimates as firms attempt to lower tariff or antidumping duty costs by lowering import prices.
“Transfer pricing motives would typically lead to lower pass-through estimates as firms attempt to lower the tariff / antidumping duties costs by lowering import prices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the model with production in K and C, if fixed costs of opening a plant in C are sufficiently large or tariffs on imports from K are sufficiently small, the firm produces in K and there is full pass-through of tariffs to U.S. consumer prices.
“As long as the fixed costs of opening a plant in C are sufficiently large, or tariffs on imports from K are sufficiently small, this inequality will still hold resulting in full pass-through of the tariffs to the prices faced by U.S. consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: There is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The foreign supplier has constant marginal cost in each available production location.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The fixed cost of foreign production is higher than domestic production.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTaken together, Figures 2a and 2b are a striking illustration of the changes in supply chains induced by U.S. tariffs.
“Taken together, Figures 2a and 2b are a striking illustration of the changes in supply chains induced by U.S. tariffs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDomestic retail prices reflect the impacts of tariffs on domestic competitors, production relocation, and complementary goods, while unit values from trade data would miss these channels.
“The domestic retail prices reflect the impacts of tariffs on domestic competitors, production relocation, and complementary goods, while unit values from trade data would miss these channels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe Section 201 safeguard duties were added on top of standard MFN rates under Chapter 84, which were 1% for washing machines in 2019.
“The Section 201 safeguard tariffs are imposed in addition to the standard MFN rates under Chapter 84 of the tariff schedule (which, in 2019, were 1 percent for washing machines).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the model with production relocation between countries C and V, under sufficiently high tariffs against C, the producer earns higher profits by producing in V, leading to an increase in the domestic price by pV - pC ≤ τ.
“However, under sufficiently high import tariffs against country C, the producer obtains higher profits from producing in country V instead.This leads to an increase in the domestic price by p V -p C ≤ τ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: There is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The foreign supplier has constant marginal cost in each available production location.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the Figure 1b example, the fixed cost to establish production in countries C and V is the same.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe CPI for laundry equipment fell considerably right after the Korea/Mexico-to-China relocation in mid-2012, which is consistent with negative pass-through.
“On the other hand, as we show below in Figure 4, the CPI for laundry equipment declines considerably just after the production relocation from Korea/Mexico to China in mid-2012-consistent with the negative pass-through interpretation of the changes in unit values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe price analysis begins in mid-July 2014 because product ages near March 2013 have large measurement error and early discounts are strong.
“As this introduces large measurement error in products' ages in dates near March 2013 and we find particularly strong price discounts of appliances in the first few months, we start our price analysis from mid-July 2014 onward.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningRefrigerators and dishwashers were included as placebo categories to test the plausibility of the estimates.
“We include refrigerators and dishwashers in the analysis as placebo effects-a check for the plausibility of our estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIdentifying the price impacts of complementary goods not subject to tariffs is a further issue, and even if such goods were included in a pass-through regression, their import price impacts would likely not be reflected in the α1 coefficient.
“third and more complicated issue arises from identifying the price impacts of complementary goods not subject to tariffs.Even when these products would be included in a pass-through regression, the impacts to import prices would likely not be reflected in the α 1 coefficient from equation (5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe quota of 1.2 million units at the lower additional tariff rate was reached in October 2018, and all relevant units thereafter paid a higher rate of 50 percent.
“As mentioned above, the quota of 1.2 million units subject to the lower additional tariff rate was reached in October 2018, and all relevant units thereafter paid a higher rate of 50 percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor the Section 201 safeguard, product-level exclusions within HS-10 codes exist, but the excluded products cannot be identified in the retail price data.
“For the Section 201 safeguard case, there were a number of product-level exclusions (within HS-10 codes), but we are unable to identify these excluded products in the retail price data (see Appendix B.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe Section 201 safeguard was a tariff-rate quota and therefore had multiple tariff rates during the sample period.
“A second complication relates to the fact that the Section 201 safeguard measure was a tariff-rate quota, and therefore exhibits multiple tariff rates during the sample period we study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPierce (2011) found that protected domestic plants in antidumping cases tend to raise prices and markups while physical productivity falls.
“Indeed, as shown by Pierce (2011) protected domestic plants from antidumping duties tend to exhibit increased prices and markups, with physical productivity actually falling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pierce (2011) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLG's Clarksville, Tennessee plant was scheduled to open in late 2018 or early 2019 and was advertised to create about 600 jobs.
“An LG Electronic factory in Clarksville, Tennessee, is scheduled for a late 2018 or early 2019 opening, with an advertised creation of roughly 600 new jobs (LG Electronics (2017)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites LG Electronics (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe measure reflects an overall elasticity for products consumed because it uses overall consumer prices and adjusts for the share of domestic production facing no tariff changes.
“The focus on the overall prices paid by consumers-made possible by our data-and adjustment for the share of domestic production facing no tariff changes (the M C,t-1 D C,t-1 term in the denominator) ensures that the measure reflects an overall elasticity for products consumed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premiseown dataThe September 2018 Section 301 tariffs on refrigerators and ranges were set at 10%.
“Included in what was a third round of tariffs imposed on Chinese imports (from the Section 301 provision of U.S. trade law intended to penalize unfair trade practices) were refrigerators and electric/gas ranges; household dishwashers were not subject to new tariffs.”
- Also stated in: § 4.2 Estimating the Price Effects of Washing Machine Import Restrictions · plain
“These tariffs went into effect in September (roughly t = 28 in Figure 5b) at a rate of 10 percent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 4.2 Estimating the Price Effects of Washing Machine Import Restrictions · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThose Section 232 measures led to higher domestic steel and aluminum prices, which are major input costs for US washer production.
“The ultimate result of these measures, however, was a jump in the domestic prices of steel and aluminum-which together represent a significant input cost in U.S. production of washing machines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSamsung's Newberry, South Carolina plant opened in January 2018 and planned to make 1 million washing machines that year.
“The Samsung factory in Newberry, South Carolina opened in January 2018 with plans to produce 1 million washing machines that year”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Samsung (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe control category is intended to subtract out other factors that could influence consumer prices for the product category apart from tariffs.
“The control category is meant to subtract out other factors that could be influencing consumer prices for product category C during this time period, apart from tariffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenIn March 2018, the United States imposed Section 232 tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum.
“Using the rarely invoked”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenUnit-value measurement faces the known problem of whether intra-firm transactions reflect prices relevant for ultimate consumers.
“Finally, measurement from unit values faces the known problem of whether intra-firm transactions reflect prices that are relevant for ultimate consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe rates reset in February 2019, with statutory rates declining to 18 percent in quota and 45 percent out of quota.
“These rates reset in February 2019, where the statutory rates decline to 18 percent (in quota) and 45 percent (out of quota).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the investigation record, LG and Samsung asked that the excluded washer types be brought within the scope, while Whirlpool and G.E. opposed amending the scope.
“From the investigation documents, we learn that the respondents (LG and Samsung) requested these excluded articles be included within the scope of the investigation, whereas Whirlpool and G.E. urged against amending the scope (see USITC 2017, page 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USITC 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe gap between the two import measures is usually small and reflects idiosyncratic customs-clearance timing and time spent in bonded temporary storage.
“Typically the differences in the data between these two definitions are small and reflect idiosyncratic timing in customs clearance as well as time spend in temporary storage in bonded warehouses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenExcluded products included stacked washer-dryers, commercial washers, and several specialty washers.
“Among these excluded products were stacked washer-dryers, commercial washers, and the following presumably specialty washers:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe extra Section 301 rates on these appliances were only 10 percent, much smaller than the other trade measures adopted in 2018.
“The additional rates applied to these goods was substantially smaller (only 10 percent) than other trade provisions put into place in 2018.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationForeign trade zones account for about one-sixth of U.S. manufacturing value-added and about one-eighth of the value of U.S. imports.
“According to research by Grant (2017), foreign trade zones account for roughly one-sixth of U.S. manufacturing value-added, and one-eighth of the value of U.S. imports.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grant (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenWhen a foreign trade zone's finished product enters the United States for domestic use, the firm owes duties on the value of the imported parts.
“If the finished product of an FTZ enters the United States for domestic consumption, then the firm must then pay duties on the value of the imported parts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataData limitations prevent a full treatment of other factors that could be added to the analysis.
“There are a number of other factors that could be added to this analysis; unfortunately, data limitations prevent a full treatment on all of these channels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataConfidence intervals for the washer and dryer coefficient estimates use standard errors clustered by model.
“based on standard errors clustered by model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenAn imported good is generally recorded twice, first as a general import on arrival at the border and again as an import for consumption once it clears customs.
“In general, any imported good will be recorded twice: first as a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHufbauer, Lowry et al. (2012) calculated a cost of roughly 900,000 USD per job for the Section 421 tariffs on Chinese tire imports.
“Hufbauer, Lowry et al. (2012) calculate such a metric from the section 421 tariffs on Chinese tire imports, finding a cost of roughly 900,000 USD per job.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hufbauer, Lowry et al. (2012)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe estimated consumer cost per job is of the same order of magnitude as other similar exercises.
“This number is of the same order of magnitude as other similar exercises.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll of these calculations are made in partial equilibrium.
“All these calculations are made in partial equilibrium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningA foreign trade zone firm may choose between paying the tariff rate for the finished product and the rate for the imported components.
“the FTZ firm is allowed to choose whether they pay the tariff rate of the finished product (washing machine) or the imported components (various washing machine parts).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenA manufacturing facility in a foreign trade zone, established at the request of a U.S. firm to the Department of Commerce, operates outside the U.S. customs border.
“Created at the request of a U.S. firm to the U.S. Department of Commerce, a manufacturing facility in an FTZ operates outside of the customs border of the United States.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenHousehold refrigerators and gas and electric stoves and ranges were among the goods covered by the third round of Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports imposed in September 2018.
“Among the set of products included under the third round of Section 301 tariffs against Chinese goods put into place in September 2018 were household refrigerators and gas/electric stoves and ranges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe washer parts added to the Section 201 investigation are more accurately characterized as sub-assemblies of washers than as individual parts.
“This description makes clear that these additional inclusions are better described as sub-assemblies of washers than indivisible parts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites USITC 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationObservations with a ratio of unit values in t relative to t-12 greater than 3 or less than 1/3 were dropped, following the convention of Amiti, Redding and Weinstein (2019).
“We also follow the convention ofAmiti, Redding and Weinstein (2019) and drop observations with a ratio of unit values in t relative to t-12 of greater than 3 or less than 1/3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amiti, Redding and Weinstein (2019) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenStandard errors in the price regressions are clustered by model, and the reported 95% confidence intervals for washer and dryer coefficients are based on those clustered standard errors.
“Standard errors are clustered by model.”
- Also stated in: § C.2 Total Number of Available Models · plain
“The dotted lines denote 95 percent confidence intervals for the coefficient estimates for washers and dryers, based on standard errors clustered by model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § C.2 Total Number of Available Models · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationU.S. retail chains price uniformly across locations.
“Hitsch, Hortacsu and Lin (2017) and DellaVigna and Gentzkow (2017) report evidence suggesting uniform pricing in U.S. retail chains across locations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hitsch, Hortacsu and Lin (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites DellaVigna and Gentzkow (2017) source
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.
“We assume that there is a foreign monopolist that supplies washers to the United States.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Consumer preferences for washers imply a constant elasticity of substitution demand function.
“We further assume that consumer preferences for washers lead to a constant elasticity of substitution demand function”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The foreign supplier has constant marginal cost in each available production location.
“and that the foreign supplier has constant marginal cost in each of the available production locations.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The model assumes away domestic producers of washing machines.
“Note that for simplicity we assume away any domestic producers of washing machines, since for the foreign production relocation the existence of domestic producers is not essential, and the graphical analysis below is easier to convey without them.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The importer is a perfectly competitive intermediary that sells washers to U.S. consumers, so no mark-up is added to the tariff.
“For simplicity we assume the importer is a perfectly competitive intermediary who in turn sells the washers to U.S. consumers, so there is no mark-up added to the tariff.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the Figure 1b example, the fixed cost to establish production in countries C and V is the same.
“If the fixed cost to establish production in these countries is the same, and there are no import restrictions, the foreign monopolist chooses the production location with the lower marginal cost-here, country C.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The fixed cost of foreign production is higher than domestic production.
“If the foreign monopolist is headquartered in country K, the assumption of higher fixed cost of foreign production is common in the literature on multinational firms (e.g., Brainard (1997), Helpman, Melitz and Yeaple (2004)).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Gap Intelligence weekly retailer-product price data are nationally representative of U.S. washer and dryer prices.
“While some heterogeneity in prices across retail locations may exist, the provided weekly retailer-product specific price information is what Gap Intelligence considers the nationally representative price.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Section 201 ruling contained no country-level exclusions covering China and Mexico.
“Given that the section 201 ruling did not provide for country-level exclusions for these cases”
The paper relies on this without support.
Foreign trade zone production is a quantitatively important part of U.S. washing machine imports.
“One important feature of U.S. imports of washing machines is the use of foreign trade zone (FTZ) production in the United States.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Any linear age effects of washer/dryer models are captured by the model-by-time term in the price regression.
“Note that any linear age effects of washer/dryer models will be captured by the λ C(i)t term.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Production might relocate to (third) countries unaffected by the bilateral trade war rather than being reshored to domestic economies.
“In the former case, and as some studies have already shown (see Flaaen et al., 2020), production might relocate to (third) countries unaffected by the bilateral trade war rather than being reshored to domestic economies.”
From De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age (2020) · cites this paper as Flaaen et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two annual consumer-cost totals differ
MinorThe main text gives annual consumer costs as $1.542 billion, while the accompanying footnote gives $1.552 billion. The $10 million difference is not a rounding difference.
“The result is an increase of 1.542 billion USD in consumer costs per year.”
“Together, equal to 1.552 billion USD.”
Cites
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.i · Cited by 7,275 · see citing works
Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282804322970814 · Cited by 4,090 · see citing works
Globalization and the Gains From Variety
Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541 · Cited by 2,478 · see citing works
Shrouded Attributes, Consumer Myopia, and Information Suppression in Competitive Markets
Gabaix, X., & Laibson, D. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.505 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
The Long and Short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement
Trefler, D. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828042002633 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P. J., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz036 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
The Impact of the 2018 Tariffs on Prices and Welfare
Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. E. (2019) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.33.4.187 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Export-Platform Foreign Direct Investment
Ekholm, K., Forslid, R., & Markusen, J. R. (2007) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2007.5.4.776 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Yeaple, S. R. (2003) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/s0022-1996(02)00051-x · Cited by 540 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consistent with the predictions of models of export platform FDI (e.g., Yeaple 2003; Ekholm, Forslid and Markusen 2007; Tintelnot 2017), our findings illustrate the relocation of production to third markets as export platforms in response to bilateral tariff changes.2 I Import Restrictions and…”
The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence from the Introduction of Medicare
Finkelstein, A. N. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.1.1 · Cited by 530 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Hence, though the patterns evident in Figure 5 are informative, we must factor in the different trends (see, e.g., Finkelstein (2007)) to arrive at the true effect of tariff changes on prices.”
Endogenous market structures in international trade (natura facit saltum)
Horstmann, I. J., & Markusen, J. R. (1992) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/0022-1996(92)90038-l · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Optimal Tariffs and Market Power: The Evidence
Broda, C., Limão, N., & Weinstein, D. E. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.5.2032 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Symmetric pass-through of tariffs and exchange rates under imperfect competition: An empirical test
Feenstra, R. C. (1989) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/0022-1996(89)90076-7 · Cited by 440 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Dating back to at least Feenstra (1989), several papers have analyzed the response of import prices to tariff changes (e.g., Winkelmann and Winkelmann 1998; Trefler 2004; Broda and Weinstein 2006; Broda, Limao and Weinstein 2008; Spearot 2012; Ludema and Yu 2016; Fitzgerald and Haller 2018).”
Uniform Pricing in U.S. Retail Chains*
DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. A. (2019) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz019 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Ellison, G. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/120.2.585 · Cited by 275 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One possibility is that consumers might be more informed about, and thus have a more elastic demand, for the washer unit while treating the dryer as an “add-on” good, for which demand is less elastic, as in Ellison (2005) and Gabaix and Laibson (2006).”
The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on U.S. Prices and Welfare
Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25672 · Cited by 203
Global Production with Export Platforms*
Tintelnot, F. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjw037 · Cited by 201 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consistent with the predictions of models of export platform FDI (e.g., Yeaple 2003; Ekholm, Forslid and Markusen 2007; Tintelnot 2017), our findings illustrate the relocation of production to third markets as export platforms in response to bilateral tariff changes.2 I Import Restrictions and…”
Self-citationTariff-jumping antidumping duties
Blonigen, B. A. (2002) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/s0022-1996(01)00135-0 · Cited by 190 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Blonigen (2002) studies the tariff jumping behavior of foreign firms to U.S. antidumping measures in the 1980s.”
Goldberg, P. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016) · Handbook of commercial policy · doi:10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.002 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Pass-Through in Retail and Wholesale
Nakamura, E. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.2.430 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
A Direct Test of the Theory of Comparative Advantage: The Case of Japan
Bernhofen, D. M., & Brown, J. C. (2004) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/379944 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Ellison, G. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/0033553053970151 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Bagwell, K., Bown, C. P., & Staiger, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20151192 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Plant-level responses to antidumping duties: Evidence from U.S. manufacturers
Pierce, J. R. (2011) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.07.006 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The Price Effects of a Large Merger of Manufacturers: A Case Study of Maytag-Whirlpool
Ashenfelter, O. C., Hosken, D. S., & Weinberg, M. C. (2013) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.5.1.239 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Tariff pass-through, firm heterogeneity and product quality
Ludema, R. D., & Yu, Z. (2016) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.09.008 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Effect on Prices of Japan's Entry into World Commerce after 1858
Huber, J. R. (1971) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259771 · Cited by 76 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Huber (1971) and Bernhofen and Brown (2004) compare 19th-century autarky price levels of several goods in Japan with price levels after trade liberalization.”
Fitzgerald, D., & Haller, S. A. (2018) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.04.005 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Uniform Pricing in US Retail Chains
DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · doi:10.3386/w23996 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P., et al. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25638 · Cited by 73
International Shocks and Domestic Prices: How Large Are Strategic Complementarities?
Amiti, M., Itskhoki, O., & Konings, J. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22119 · Cited by 65
Why Special Economic Zones? Using Trade Policy to Discriminate across Importers
Grant, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180384 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Firm Heterogeneity, New Investment and Acquisitions
Spearot, A. C. (2012) · Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6451.2012.00477.x · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Dating back to at least Feenstra (1989), several papers have analyzed the response of import prices to tariff changes (e.g., Winkelmann and Winkelmann 1998; Trefler 2004; Broda and Weinstein 2006; Broda, Limao and Weinstein 2008; Spearot 2012; Ludema and Yu 2016; Fitzgerald and Haller 2018).”
Estimating US Consumer Gains from Chinese Imports
Bai, L., & Stumpner, S. (2019) · American Economic Review Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20180358 · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bai and Stumpner (2019) and Jaravel and Sager (2019) measure the U.S. consumer gains from imports from China using retail price data.”
Goldberg, P. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21957 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Tariff Incidence: Evidence from U.S. Sugar Duties, 1890-1930
Irwin, D. (2014) · doi:10.3386/w20635 · Cited by 31
Tariffs, quotas and terms-of-trade: The case of New Zealand
Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/s0022-1996(97)00050-0 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Dating back to at least Feenstra (1989), several papers have analyzed the response of import prices to tariff changes (e.g., Winkelmann and Winkelmann 1998; Trefler 2004; Broda and Weinstein 2006; Broda, Limao and Weinstein 2008; Spearot 2012; Ludema and Yu 2016; Fitzgerald and Haller 2018).”
Plant-Level Responses to Antidumping Duties: Evidence from U.S. ManufacturersPreprint
Pierce, J. R. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1515690 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Global Production with Export Platforms
Tintelnot, F. (2016) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w22236 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationCorrigendum: The Price Effects of a Large Merger of Manufacturers: A Case Study of Maytag Whirlpool
Ashenfelter, O., Hosken, D., & Weinberg, M. (2014) · American Economic Journal Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.6.1.308 · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Brainard S. Lael., 1997, American Economic Review, 87, 520
- Hitsch Günter, 2017, Chicago Booth Research Paper, 17
- Hufbauer Gary C, 2012, Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, 12
- Irwin Douglas A, 2019, Sugar Duties, 1890
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Economic Impacts of the US–China Trade War
Fajgelbaum, P., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2022) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-110410 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age
Antràs, P. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w28115 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Tariff Pass-Through at the Border and at the Store: Evidence from US Trade Policy
Cavallo, A. F., Gopinath, G., Neiman, B., & Tang, J. (2021) · American Economic Review Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20190536 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Global Supply Chains: The Looming “Great Reallocation”
Alfaro, L., & Chor, D. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31661 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Rising Import Tariffs, Falling Export Growth: When Modern Supply Chains Meet Old-Style Protectionism
Handley, K., Kamal, F., & Monarch, R. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26611 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
The Impacts of the U.S. Trade War on Chinese Exporters
Jiao, Y., Liu, Z., Tian, Z., & Wang, X. (2022) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01229 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Is US trade policy reshaping global supply chains?
Freund, C. L., Mattoo, A., Mulabdić, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.104011 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
The Consumption Response to Trade Shocks: Evidence from the US-China Trade War
Waugh, M. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26353 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The US-China Trade War and Global Reallocations
Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P., et al. (2024) · American Economic Review Insights · doi:10.1257/aeri.20230094 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Exchange Rates and Prices: Evidence from the 2015 Swiss Franc Appreciation
Auer, R., Burstein, A., & Lein, S. M. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181415 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Illuminating the effects of the US-China tariff war on China’s economy
Chor, D., & Li, B. (2024) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.103926 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
The US-China Trade War and Global Reallocations
Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P., et al. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29562 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Did trade liberalization with China influence US elections?
Che, Y., Lu, Y., Pierce, J. R., Schott, P. K., & Tao, Z. (2022) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103652 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
He, C., Mau, K., & Xu, M. (2021) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102021 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Global Supply Chains: The Looming “Great Reallocation”Preprint
Alfaro, L., & Chor, D. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4567667 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“(2020), Flaaen et al. (2020), and Handley et al. (2020) for studies of the impact of the tariffs on economic”
BackgroundU.S.-China TensionPreprint
Rogers, J. H., Sun, B., & Sun, T. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4815838 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Evaluating the cumulative impact of the US–China trade war along global value chains
Wu, J. Y., Wood, J., Oh, K., et al. (2021) · World Economy · doi:10.1111/twec.13125 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
THE BREXIT VOTE, INFLATION AND U.K. LIVING STANDARDS
Breinlich, H., Leromain, E., Novy, D., et al. (2021) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12541 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The US-China Trade War and Global Reallocations
Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P., Khandelwal, A. K., & Taglioni, D. (2022) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-9894 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Lessons from US–China Trade Relations
Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. (2023) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-082222-082019 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
An eye for an eye? The trade and price effects of China's retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports
Ma, H., Ning, J., & Xu, M. (2021) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101685 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The Economic Impacts of the US-China Trade War
Fajgelbaum, P., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29315 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“A group of papers studies the response of US import prices to US tariffs (Amiti et al., 2019; Fajgelbaum et al., 2020; Cavallo et al., 2021; Flaaen et al., 2020).”
Is US Trade Policy Reshaping Global Supply Chains ?
Mattoo, A., Freund, C. L., Mulabdić, A., et al. (2023) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-10593 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Trade Protection, Stock-Market Returns, and Welfare
Amiti, M., Gomez, M., Kong, S. H., & Weinstein, D. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28758 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Did Trump’s trade war impact the 2018 election?
Blanchard, E. J., Bown, C. P., & Chor, D. (2024) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.103891 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Rising Import Tariffs, Falling Exports: When Modern Supply Chains Meet Old-Style Protectionism
Handley, K., Kamal, F., & Monarch, R. (2024) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20210051 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. (2022) · Handbook of international economics · doi:10.1016/bs.hesint.2022.02.004 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The Impact of Retaliatory Tariffs on Agricultural and Food Trade
Carter, C., & Steinbach, S. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27147 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Disentangling the Effects of the 2018–2019 Tariffs on a Globally Connected U.S. Manufacturing Sector
Flaaen, A. B., & Pierce, J. R. (2024) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01498 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationPort congestion, container shortages, and U.S. foreign trade
Steinbach, S. (2022) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110392 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The macroeconomic stabilization of tariff shocks: What is the optimal monetary response?
Bergin, P. R., & Corsetti, G. (2023) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2023.103758 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Hakim, T. A., Karia, A. A., David, J., Ginsad, R., Lokman, N., & Zolkafli, S. (2022) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2022.2141423 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Flaaen et al. (2020), who mentioned that tariff had increased the price of products in the markets, which negatively affects purchasing power.”
BackgroundTariff Passthrough at the Border and at the Store: Evidence from US Trade Policy
Cavallo, A., Gopinath, G., Neiman, B., et al. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26396 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Rather than retailers earning lower profits, another possibility – following the logic and analysis in Flaaen, Hortaçsu, and Tintelnot (2019) and Amiti, Redding, and Weinstein (2019) – is that in response to the tariffs, domestic producers raise their prices to retailers on goods that compete with…”
InfluentialBenguria, F., & Saffie, F. (2024) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.103987 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The global impact of the US–China trade war: firm-level evidence
Benguria, F. (2022) · Review of World Economics · doi:10.1007/s10290-022-00490-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“The resulting panel of firms is similar, for example, to Forbes [2004] (who studies the transmission of the East Asian and Russian crisis) and Claessens et al.”
Is US Trade Policy Reshaping Global Supply Chains?Preprint
Freund, C. L., Mattoo, A., Mulabdić, A., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4615340 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Growth in imports of goods at both the 2-digit and 6-digit levels from China is positively correlated with growth in exports of goods at the related 10-digit levels to the United States.”
BackgroundFinancial Constraints and Propagation of Shocks in Production Networks
Demir, B., Javorcik, B. S., Michalski, T., & Örs, E. (2022) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01162 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Third, we also add to the literature that renewed interest in analyzing the effects of incidence of tariff policy (most recently Amiti, Redding et al., 2019; Fajgelbaum et al., 2019; Flaaen et al., 2020; Cavallo et al., 2021).”
Heterogeneous impacts of the Section 301 tariffs: Evidence from the revision of product lists
Ma, H., & Meng, L. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · doi:10.1111/caje.12640 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Does deglobalization imply the end of global supply chains?
Yücesan, E. (2025) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102398 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Miller, J. W., Jin, Y., & Ortega, D. L. (2025) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12350 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Who Will Fill China's Shoes? The Global Evolution of Labor-Intensive Manufacturing
Hanson, G. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28313 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The Macroeconomics of Tariff Shocks
Auclert, A., Rognlie, M., & Straub, L. (2025) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w33726 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ripple effects in regional value chains: Evidence from an episode of the US–China trade war
Hayakawa, K., Pyun, J. H., Yamashita, N., & Yang, C. (2023) · World Economy · doi:10.1111/twec.13444 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
The impact of COVID ‐19 trade measures on agricultural and food trade
Ahn, S., & Steinbach, S. (2022) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13286 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Supply chain disruptions and containerized agricultural exports from California ports
Carter, C. A., Steinbach, S., & Zhuang, X. (2022) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13311 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Aghion, P., Bergeaud, A., Lequien, M., Melitz, M. J., & Zuber, T. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29196 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
U.S.–China trade conflicts and R&D investment: evidence from the BIS entity lists
Hu, H., Yang, S., Lin, Z., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03369-8 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Flaaen et al. (2020) fi nd the imposition of tariffs in 2018 has increased the price of washing machines by almost 12% in almost all source countries.”
The Us-China Trade War and Global ReallocationsPreprint
Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P. K., Kennedy, P., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3983916 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“7Studies using a translog or almost-ideal demand system with symmetric substitution elasticities include Novy (2012), Kee et al. (2008), Fajgelbaum and Khandelwal (2016), and Feenstra and Weinstein (2017).”
InfluentialHow does GVC reconstruction affect economic growth and employment? Analysis of USA–China decoupling
Wu, J. Y., Wood, J., & Huang, X. (2021) · Asian-Pacific Economic Literature · doi:10.1111/apel.12319 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The Downstream Impact of Upstream Tariffs: Evidence from Investment Decisions in Supply Chains
Martin, T., & Otto, C. A. (2023) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109023000777 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“…their own 1 AlsorelatedarerecentpapersontheUnitedStates – Chinatradewarof2018and2019,includingAmiti, Redding, and Weinstein (2019), (2020), Flaaen and Pierce (2019), Amiti, Kong, and Weinstein (2020), Fajgelbaum, Goldberg, Kennedy, and Khandelwal (2020), and Flaaen, Hortaçsu, and Tintelnot (2020).”
The Impacts of the U.S. Trade War on Chinese ExportersPreprint
Jiao, Y., Liu, Z., Tian, Z., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3745459 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Non-Tariff Barriers in the U.S.-China Trade War
Chen, T., Hsieh, C., & Song, Z. M. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30318 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Our paper builds on Amiti et al. (2019), Fajgelbaum et al. (2019), Waugh (2019), Flaaen et al. (2020), and Cavallo et al. (2021) who study the effect of the U.S.-China trade war.”
Global sourcing under tariffs: A perspective of time series analysis
Zhang, D. J., Dabadghao, S., & Udenio, M. (2024) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109473 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Securing technological leadership? The cost of export controls on firms
Crosignani, M., Han, L., Macchiavelli, M., & Silva, A. F. (2025) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2025.104192 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Exporting, Global Sourcing, and Multinational Activity: Theory and Evidence from the United States
Antràs, P., Fadeev, E., Fort, T., et al. (2024) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01450 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationMakioka, R., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Journal of the Japanese and International Economies · doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2024.101336 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Macroeconomic Stabilization of Tariff Shocks: What is the Optimal Monetary Response?
Bergin, P. R., & Corsetti, G. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26995 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Illuminating the Effects of the Us-China Tariff War on China's EconomyPreprint
Chor, D., & Li, B. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3940035 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The return of protectionism: Prospects for Sino-US trade relations in the wake of the trade war
Ma, H., & Ning, J. (2024) · China Economic Quarterly International · doi:10.1016/j.ceqi.2024.09.003 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Caliendo, L., & Parro, F. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29051 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Is the American Soft Power a Casualty of the Trade War?
Fan, H., Hu, Y., Tang, L., & Wei, S. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29999 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Pains or gains: Trade war, trade deficit, and tariff evasion
Che, Y., Lin, D., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2025.104090 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Trade and inequality in Europe and the US
Dorn, D., & Levell, P. (2024) · Oxford Open Economics · doi:10.1093/ooec/odad046 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The multifaceted impact of US trade policy on financial markets
Boer, L., Menkhoff, L., & Rieth, M. (2022) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.2952 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
ON THE DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF INTERNATIONAL TARIFFS
Carroll, D. R., & Hur, S. (2023) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12648 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Two-Sided Market Power in Firm-to-Firm TradePreprint
Alviarez, V., Fioretti, M., Kikkawa, A. K., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4448304 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The impact of the strengthening of export controls on Japanese exports of dual-use goods
Hayakawa, K., Ito, K., Fukao, K., et al. (2023) · International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.inteco.2023.03.004 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Labour market impacts of the China shock: Why the tide of Globalisation did not lift all boats
Dorn, D., & Levell, P. (2024) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102629 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“D. Dorn and P. Levell Labour Economics 91 (2024) an increase in prices faced by US firms and consumers (Amiti, Redding and Weinstein, 2019; Fajgelbaum et al., 2020; Flaaen, Hortaçsu and Tintelnot, 2020; Cavallo et al., 2021).”
Tariff pass-through and implications for domestic markets: Evidence from U.S. steel imports
Ahmad, M., & Ahmad, I. (2023) · Journal of International Trade & Economic Development · doi:10.1080/09638199.2023.2187654 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…to the predictions of the trade theory, most recent studies have found that the U.S. tariffs have been entirely passed on to U.S. domestic consumers and producers (Amiti, Redding, and Weinstein 2019; Fajgelbaum et al. 2020; Flaaen, Hortaçsu, and Tintelnot 2020; Amiti, Redding, and Weinstein 2020).”
BackgroundThe impact of the U.S.-China trade war on air and ocean shipments
Zou, L., Dresner, M., & Yu, C. (2024) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.001 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sino-US trade friction and the firm value: Evidence from listed firms in China
Liu, M., Lin, F., Feng, F., et al. (2025) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.016 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Globally chained economies, unwitting victims of the US‐China trade war
Wu, J. Y., Huh, C. G., & Wood, J. (2021) · Asian-Pacific Economic Literature · doi:10.1111/apel.12334 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Who Will Fill China’s Shoes? The Global Evolution of Labor-Intensive Manufacturing
Hanson, G. (2020) · East Asian Economic Review · doi:10.11644/kiep.eaer.2020.24.4.382 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Geopolitical Risk and Decoupling: Evidence from U.S. Export ControlsPreprint
Crosignani, M., Han, L., Macchiavelli, M., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4563485 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Li, H., Li, Z., Park, Z., et al. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5031650 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Global supply chain resilience: Facts, rationales and responses
Li, Z., & Xu, M. (2024) · Economic and Political Studies · doi:10.1080/20954816.2024.2369419 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Flaaen, Hortaçsu, and Tintelnot (2020) examine the impact of US anti-dumping shocks on production relocation and the price of washing machines produced by large multinationals from the Republic of Korea.”
Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs: a framework for economic impact and policy assessment
Siriopoulos, C., Spyridou, A. E., & Polyzos, E. (2025) · Studies in Economics and Finance · doi:10.1108/sef-05-2025-0344 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Transparency as the antidote: Do trade disputes intensify corporate earnings management?
Yao, S., Li, T., Liao, J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102826 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Global Value Chains in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Symptoms of Deglobalization
Drelich-Skulska, B., Bobowski, S., & Gola, J. (2021) · EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL · doi:10.35808/ersj/2532 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Chen, Z., & Kim, J.-T. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17061453 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Patra, S., & Malik, K. (2025) · Global Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101094 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Tariff Passthrough at the Border and at the Store: Evidence from US Trade Policy
Cavallo, A., Gopinath, G., Neiman, B., et al. (2019) · Working paper series · doi:10.29412/res.wp.2019.12 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Trade and inequality in Europe and the US
Dorn, D., & Levell, P. (2021) · doi:10.1920/re.ifs.2021.0201 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Beyond Tariffs: How did China’s State–Owned Enterprises Shape the US–China Trade War?Preprint
Benguria, F., & Saffie, F. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3969215 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Did the 2018 Trade War Improve Job Opportunities for US Workers?
Javorcik, B. S., Stapleton, K., Kett, B., & O'Kane, L. (2022) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-10249 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Fowler et al. (2016) establish a set of metrics for comparing different labor market delineations and provide an overview of these differences.”
Two-Sided Market Power in Firm-to-Firm Trade
Alviarez, V., Fioretti, M., Kikkawa, K., et al. (2023) · doi:10.18235/0004746 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Transitory and Permanent Import Tariff Shocks in the United States: An Empirical Investigation
Schmitt‐Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2025) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w33997 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Li, B., Liao, W., Sun, W., Zeng, Y., & Zheng, S. (2024) · Journal of Real Estate Research · doi:10.1080/08965803.2024.2367794 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Retreating from risks: Household stock market participation in a protectionist era
Li, J., & Li, W. (2025) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2025.107392 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The environmental and economic impacts of India’s emergence as the global manufacturing hub
Zhang, X., Li, Y., Zhu, K., Lin, K., & Wang, S. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04356-9 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…Koopman et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2022a; Ellison and Glaeser, 1999; Ellison et al., 2010; Alfaro and Charlton, 2009; Ellison and Glaeser, 1997; Posada and Straume, 2004; Alfaro et al., 2019; Antras et al., 2017; Flaaen et al., 2020; Delis et al., 2019; Martin et al., 2014; Wen, 2004; Voget, 2011).”
Detecting Tariff Effects on Consumer Prices in Real Time
Minton, R., & Somale, M. A. (2025) · FEDS Notes · doi:10.17016/2380-7172.3786 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Tian, W., & Hei, Y. (2023) · Asian Economic Papers · doi:10.1162/asep_a_00859 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Consumer Credit and the Incidence of Tariffs: Evidence from the Auto IndustryPreprint
Hankins, K. W., Shahraki, M. M., & Sovich, D. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4127340 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Labor Market Rigidity at Home and Multinational Corporations' Flexible Task Reallocation Abroad
Ahn, J., Choi, J., & Chung, S. (2022) · World Bank policy research working paper · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-10114 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ad valorem tariffs in global supply chain networks and impacts on labor
Nagurney, A., & Samadi, S. (2025) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1080/01605682.2025.2592758 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Xiong, T., Zhang, W., & Zhao, F. (2023) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12532 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The impacts of the China–US trade war on China’s trade and greenfield investment
Fan, H., Guo, G., & Wu, C. (2024) · Economic and Political Studies · doi:10.1080/20954816.2024.2341343 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“…Redding, and Weinstein 2019; Amiti, Redding, and Weinstein 2020; Cavallo et al. 2021; Fajgelbaum et al. 2020; Fajgelbaum and Khandelwal 2021; Flaaen, Hortac¸su, and Tintelnot 2020; Waugh 2019), financial (Amiti, Kong, and Weinstein 2021; Benguria et al. 2022; Huang et al. 2023), political…”
Tariff Pass-Through and Implications for Domestic Markets: Evidence from U.S. Steel ImportsPreprint
Ahmad, M., & Ahmad, I. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4011885 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Is the American Soft Power a Casualty of the Trade War?Preprint
Fan, H., Hu, Y., Tang, L., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4098321 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Trade Wars with Trade DeficitsPreprint
Pujolas, P., & Rossbach, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5008591 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Flaaen, A., Hortaçsu, A., & Tintelnot, F.
- Affiliations
- Federal Reserve (US)
- University of Chicago and NBER ()
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- ORCID
- Flaaen, Aaron
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2020-07-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2103-2127
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2936976074
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 47.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.nber.org
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- United States trade policy, import tariffs, antidumping duties, washing machines, industrial relocation, price effects, South Korea, China, drying equipment, tariff elasticity, export platforms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review