Cited by 120RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyRNA modifications and cancer

Mutations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12 influence the higher order structure of 16 S ribosomal RNA

Allen, Patrick N., Noller, Harry F.·1989·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

We have studied the effects of protein mutations on the higher order structure of 16 S rRNA in Escherichia coli ribosomes, using a set of structure-sensitive chemical probes. Ten mutant strains were studied, which contained alterations in ribosomal proteins S4 and S12, including double mutants containing both altered S4 and S12. Two ribosomal ambiguity (ram) S4 mutant strains, four streptomycin resistant (SmR) S12 mutant strains, one streptomycin pseudodependent (SmP) S12 mutant strain, one streptomycin dependent (SmD) S12 mutant strain and two streptomycin independent (Sm1) double mutants (containing both-SmD and ram mutations) were probed and compared to an isogenic wild-type strain. In ribosomes from strains containing S4 ram mutations, nucleotides A8 and A26 become more reactive to dimethyl sulfate (DMS) at their N-1 positions. In ribosomes from strains bearing the SmD allele, A908, A909, A1413 and G1487 are significantly less reactive to chemical probes. These same effects are observed when the S4 and S12 mutations are present simultaneously in the double mutants. An interesting correlation is found between the reactivity of A908 and the miscoding potential of SmR, SmD, SmP and wild-type ribosomes; the reactivity of A908 increases as the translational error frequency of the ribosomes increases. In the case of ram ribosomes, the reactivity of A908 resembles that of wild-type, unless tRNA is bound, in which case it becomes hyper-reactive. Similarly, streptomycin has little…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90509-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, P. N., & Noller, H. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-08
Volume
208
Issue
3
Pages
457-468
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038070772
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-17129)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
ribosomal protein S4, ribosomal protein S12, ribosome structure, Escherichia coli ribosome, streptomycin resistance, streptomycin dependence, tRNA binding, translational errors
MeSH terms
Autoradiography, Bacterial Proteins, Escherichia coli, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Ribosomal Proteins, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, RNA, Transfer, Streptomycin, RNA Probes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review