Radiation effects in superconducting fusion-magnet materials
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cu-110 was selected as a benchmark material for its crucial role in REBCO HTS magnets and cables.
“Cu-110 was selected as a benchmark material for its crucial role in REBCO HTS magnets and cables [24, 25].”
From A facility for thermo-mechanical characterization of fusion magnet materials during cryogenic ion irradiation (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Brown, B. S.
- Affiliations
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Bruce S.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0022-3115 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136602021
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nuclear Materials (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Superconducting Materials and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
- Keywords
- radiation effects, superconducting magnets, fusion magnets, neutron irradiation, gamma irradiation, cryogenic irradiation, superconductors, stabilizers, insulators, structural materials, radiation shielding, magnetic fusion reactors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
