Cited by 97Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

A longitudinal study of the effects of experimenter bias on the operant learning of laboratory rats

Rosenthal, Robert, Lawson, Reed·1964·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-3956(64)90003-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is limited empirical evidence in animal research on the impact of blinding.

    “Although there is primary evidence of the impact of blinding in the clinical literature that directly compares blinded versus unblinded assessment of outcomes [82], there is limited empirical evidence in animal research [83,84].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenthal, R., & Lawson, R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1964-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
61-72
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122487768
Cited by
97
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
researcher bias, operant conditioning, laboratory rats, animal learning, expectancy effects, discrimination learning, Skinner box
MeSH terms
Conditioning, Psychological, Generalization, Psychological, Learning, Longitudinal Studies, Psychology, Experimental, Reinforcement, Psychology, Research, Biomedical Research, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review