Cited by 37Prion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

A clinico-pathological study of a case of kuru

Scrimgeour, Euan M., Masters, Colin L., Alpers, Michael P., Kaven, Joseph, Gajusek, D.Carleton·1983·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Kuru was diagnosed in a 42-year-old Melanesian male from the Eastern Highlands Province of Papua New Guinea. The clinical features indicated predominant cerebellar degeneration together with widespread cortical neuronal dysfunction and involvement of the diencephalon, hippocampus and basal ganglia. Dementia was an early and prominent feature. The duration of clinical illness was about 12 months and atypically he spent the last 7 months in hospital allowing continuous assessment. At autopsy, spongiform encephalopathy was demonstrated, and inoculation of brain tissue into 4 squirrel monkeys and 1 capuchin monkey resulted in the development of kuru. This is the longest continuous study of kuru in a hospital setting to be recorded in the adult human subject. The virus isolated from the brain of this patient has been adopted as a standard reference strain of kuru for future use and repository.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-510x(83)90044-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most striking neuropathologic feature of kuru is the presence of numerous amyloid plaques, known as kuru plaques.

    “The most striking neuropathologic feature of kuru is the presence of numerous amyloid plaques described as “spherical bodies with a rim of radiating filaments” and found in 6 of 12 cases studied by Klatzo et al (62) and in “about three quarters” of the 13 cases of Beck and Daniel (68); they then became known as “kuru plaques” (67, 69–71).”

    From Kuru (2012) · cites this paper as [70]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 37

Authors
Scrimgeour, E. M., Masters, C. L., Alpers, M. P., Kaven, J., & Gajusek, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Papua New Guinea (PG)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PG)
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-05
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
265-275
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037719793
Cited by
37
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 19 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
kuru, spongiform encephalopathy, prion disease, cerebellar degeneration, dementia, diencephalon, hippocampus, basal ganglia, clinical course, neuropathology, reference strains, Melanesians
MeSH terms
Adult, Autopsy, Brain, Humans, Kuru, Male, Pyramidal Tracts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review