CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 296Cancer and biochemical researchIon Transport and Channel RegulationMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unified theory on the basic mechanism of normal mitotic control and oncogenesis

Cone, Clarence D.·1971·Journal of Theoretical Biology
DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90042-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90042-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyperpolarizing CHO cells to −45 mV started to induce mitotic arrest and cell division was fully blocked at −75 mV.

    “First, hyperpolarizing CHO cells to −45 mV started to induce mitotic arrest and cell division was fully blocked at −75 mV.”

    From Membrane potential and cancer progression (2013) · cites this paper as Cone, 1971

  • Terminally differentiated cells (e.g., fibroblasts and epithelium) possess hyperpolarized Vm.

    “For example, terminally differentiated cells (e.g., fibroblasts and epithelium) possess hyperpolarized Vm (Cone, 1971).”

    From Membrane potential and cancer progression (2013) · cites this paper as Cone, 1971

  • The cell cycle was resumed by depolarizing the cells to −10 mV.

    “The cell cycle was resumed by depolarizing the cells to −10 mV (Cone, 1971).”

    From Membrane potential and cancer progression (2013) · cites this paper as Cone, 1971

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Abercrombie, 1962, Cancer Res, 22, 525
  2. Balazs, 1951, J. Polymer Sci, 6, 665, 10.1002/pol.1951.120060517 · DOI
  3. Balitsky, 1964, Acta Un. int. Cane, 20, 1393
  4. Baserga, 1965, Cancer Res, 25, 581
  5. Bell, 1962, J. theor. Biol, 3, 132, 10.1016/S0022-5193(62)80009-5 · DOI
  6. Brandt, 1958, Expl. Cell Res, 15, 300, 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90032-6 · DOI
  7. Bunch, 1969, Science, N. Y, 164, 1178, 10.1126/science.164.3884.1178 · DOI
  8. Coman, 1944, Cancer Res, 4, 625
  9. Cone, 1969, Trans. N. Y. Acad, Sci, 31, 404, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb15863.x · DOI
  10. Cone, 1969, J. theor. Biol, 22, 365, 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90010-1 · DOI
  11. Cone, 1970, J. theor. Biol, 30, 183, 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90043-9 · DOI
  12. Cone, 1970, Oncology, 24
  13. Cope, 1967, J. gen. Physiol, 50, 1353, 10.1085/jgp.50.5.1353 · DOI
  14. Davies, 1959, 28, 79
  15. Dorfman, 1963, J. Histochem. Cytochem, 1, 2, 10.1177/11.1.2 · DOI
  16. Gurdon, 1968, Biol. Rev, 43, 233, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1968.tb00960.x · DOI
  17. Gurdon, 1968, Sci. Am, 219, 24, 10.1038/scientificamerican1268-24 · DOI
  18. Katchalsky, 1964, Biophys. J. Pt, 4, 9, 10.1016/S0006-3495(64)86924-1 · DOI
  19. Kushmerick, 1969, Science, N. Y, 166, 1297, 10.1126/science.166.3910.1297 · DOI
  20. Lindner, 1959, Cancer Res, 19, 189
  21. Losick, 1969, J. molec. Biol, 42, 237, 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90040-0 · DOI
  22. Losick, 1969, Sci. Am, 221, 121, 10.1038/scientificamerican1169-120 · DOI
  23. Maéno, 1959, J. gen. Physiol, 43, 139, 10.1085/jgp.43.1.139 · DOI
  24. Mathews, 1953, Arch. Biochem. Biophys, 43, 181, 10.1016/0003-9861(53)90098-8 · DOI
  25. Mazia, 1961, Vol. 3
  26. Medawar, 1941, Nature, Lond, 148, 783, 10.1038/148783a0 · DOI
  27. Moscona, 1952, J. Anat, 86, 287
  28. Northrop, 1926, J. gen. Physiol, 9, 497, 10.1085/jgp.9.4.497 · DOI
  29. Overbeek, 1952, Vol. 1
  30. Overbeek, 1952, Vol. 1
  31. Overton, 1950, J. exp. Zool, 115, 521, 10.1002/jez.1401150307 · DOI
  32. Pace, 1959, J. natn. Cancer Inst, 23, 655
  33. Regelson, 1958, Nature, Lond, 181, 46, 10.1038/181046a0 · DOI
  34. Rinaldini, 1958, Int. Rev. Cytol, 7, 587, 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62696-0 · DOI
  35. Rous, 1916, J. exp. Med, 23, 549, 10.1084/jem.23.4.549 · DOI
  36. Shaefer, 1956, Naturwissenschafften, 43, 445, 10.1007/BF00629508 · DOI
  37. Simms, 1936, J. gen. Physiol, 20, 603, 10.1085/jgp.20.4.603 · DOI
  38. Simms, 1936, J. gen. Physiol, 20, 621, 10.1085/jgp.20.4.621 · DOI
  39. Singer, 1952, Q. Rev. Biol, 27, 169, 10.1086/398873 · DOI
  40. Tokuoka, 1957, Gann, 48, 353
  41. Tobey, 1966, Biophys. J, 6, 567, 10.1016/S0006-3495(66)86678-X · DOI
  42. Tosteson, 1963, 22, 19
  43. Warburg, 1924, Biochem. Z, 152, 309

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cone, C. D.
Affiliations
Langley Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Cone, Clarence D.
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1971-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
151-181
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0022-5193(71)90042-7
OpenAlex
W1996186692
Cited by
296
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer and biochemical research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
mitotic control, membrane potential, carcinogenesis, mitosis, DNA synthesis, ionic environment, mitogenic activity, cellular metabolism, feedback circuits, malignant transformation, cytogenetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Active, Cell Membrane, Contact Inhibition, Culture Media, DNA, Feedback, Membrane Potentials, Mitochondria, Mitosis, Neoplasms, Osmosis, Thymidine, Time Factors, Tritium, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review