The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schegloff, E. A. (1986) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00148124 · Cited by 897
Cited by
The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis
Firth, A. (1996) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8 · Cited by 1,074
‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation
Drew, P. (1997) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(97)89759-7 · Cited by 708
Toward Understanding Practices of Medical Interpreting: Interpreters' Involvement in History Taking
BOLDEN, G. B. (2000) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445600002004001 · Cited by 585
Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609349860 · Cited by 441
On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: A critical review
Pilnick, A., & Dingwall, R. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.033 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurzon, D.
- Venue
- Lingua
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 278-286
- ISSN
- 0024-3841 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086731677
- Cited by
- 853
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 127.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0024-3841(95)90075-6
- The paper
- Kurzon, D. (1995). Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Lingua. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(95)90075-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
