The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Degradation of coprostanol in an experimental system
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fecal biomarker analyses rely upon coprolites containing enough of each compound to enable detection and quantification, typically in the region of >0.4 μg g−1 coprolite, with the concentration of compounds remaining a direct reflection of age and depositional environment.
“Conversely, fecal biomarker analyses are reliant upon coprolites containing enough of each compound to enable detection and quantification (typically in the region of >0.4 μg g−1coprolite), with the concentration of compounds remaining being a direct reflection of age and depositional environment (30–33).”
From Pre-Clovis occupation of the Americas identified by human fecal biomarkers in coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Environmental conditions can greatly influence the preservation of fecal sterols.
“Environmental conditions can greatly influence the preservation of fecal sterols (30–33).”
From Pre-Clovis occupation of the Americas identified by human fecal biomarkers in coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Bartlett, 1985, Table Bay—A Marine Chemical Study, CSIR Research Report 565
- Brown, 1984, Sedimentary coprostanol and hydrocarbon distribution adjacent to a sewage outfall, Water Res., 18, 621, 10.1016/0043-1354(84)90213-6 · DOI
- Dutka, 1973, Coliforms are an inadequate index of water quality, J. Environ. Health, 36, 39
- Dutka, 1974, Relationship between bacterial indicators of water pollution and faecal steroids, Water Res., 8, 1047, 10.1016/0043-1354(74)90147-X · DOI
- Geldreich, 1971, Application of bacteriological data in potable water surveillance, J. Am. Wat. Works. Assoc., 63, 225, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1971.tb04070.x · DOI
- Goodfellow, 1977, A faecal sterol survey in the Clyde Estuary, Mar. Poll. Bull., 8, 272, 10.1016/0025-326X(77)90168-0 · DOI
- Hassett, 1977, Sterols in natural water and sediment, Water Res., 11, 983, 10.1016/0043-1354(77)90156-7 · DOI
- Hatcher, 1979, Sewage contamination in the New York Bight. Coprostanol as an indicator, Envir. Sci. Technol., 13, 1225, 10.1021/es60158a015 · DOI · Paper page
- McCalley, 1980, Coprostanol in Severn Estuary Sediments, Bull. Envir. Contam. Toxicol., 25, 374, 10.1007/BF01985541 · DOI · Paper page
- Muller, 1979, Sedimentary record of faecal pollution in Lake Constance by coprostanol determination, Naturwissenschaften, 66, 520, 10.1007/BF00404867 · DOI
- Murtaugh, 1967, Sterols as a measure of faecal pollution, J. Water Pollut. Control. Fed., 39, 404
- Nishimura, 1977, The occurrence of stanols in various living organisms and the behaviour of sterols in contemporary sediments, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 41, 379, 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90265-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Switzer-Howse, 1978, Faecal Sterol Studies: Sample Processing and Microbial. Degradation, National Water Research Institute Scientific Series No. 89
- Walker, 1982, Coprostanol as an indicator of faecal pollution, CRC Crit. Revs. Envir. Control, 10, 91, 10.1080/10643388209381695 · DOI
- Wun, 1976, The use of XAD-2 resin for the analysis of coprostanol in water, Water Res., 10, 955, 10.1016/0043-1354(76)90072-5 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shillito, L.-M., Whelton, H. L., Blong, J. C., Jenkins, D. L., Connolly, T. J., & Bull, I. D. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba6404 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, P. D.
- Venue
- Marine Pollution Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-29
- ISSN
- 0025-326X
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
