The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 11 of the 49 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Pre-Clovis occupation of the Americas identified by human fecal biomarkers in coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon
Open accessAbstract
When and how people first settled in the Americas is an ongoing area of research and debate. The earliest sites typically only contain lithic artifacts that cannot be directly dated. The lack of human skeletal remains in these early contexts means that alternative sources of evidence are needed. Coprolites, and the DNA contained within them, are one such source, but unresolved issues concerning ancient DNA taphonomy and potential for contamination make this approach problematic. Here, we use fecal lipid biomarkers to demonstrate unequivocally that three coprolites dated to pre-Clovis are human, raise questions over the reliance on DNA methods, and present a new radiocarbon date on basketry further supporting pre-Clovis human occupation.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Fecal lipid biomarkers (5β-stanols and bile acids) in coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon, confirm human origin for some pre-Clovis coprolites and support human occupation by 12,200 14C yr B.P. A newly dated bulrush basketry fragment at 12,273 ± 56 14C yr B.P. further supports the stratigraphic integrity of the pre-Clovis deposit.
Key findings
- Of 21 coprolites analyzed, 10 were interpreted as human, 6 as carnivore, 1 as mixed human/carnivore, and 2 were inconclusive; 13 of 21 biomarker interpretations agreed with prior mtDNA classifications.
- Of six pre-Clovis coprolites previously identified as human by mtDNA, three were confirmed as human by fecal biomarkers; coprolites 194 and 280 are the oldest coprolites determined to be unequivocally human by fecal biomarkers, dated to 12,140 ± 70 and 12,260 ± 60 14C yr B.P. (194) and 12,050 ± 25 and 12,165 ± 25 14C yr B.P. (280).
- Human occupation at Paisley Caves is stated as proven to 12,200 14C yr B.P. using fecal lipid biomarkers; a bulrush artifact recovered above coprolite 185 dated to 12,273 ± 56 14C yr B.P., while coprolite 185 itself dated to 12,290 ± 60 and 12,345 ± 55 14C yr B.P.
- Fecal sterol concentration decreased with age from 573 μg g−1 in the youngest coprolite to 9.5 μg g−1 in the oldest coprolite, with detection typically requiring >0.4 μg g−1 coprolite.
Methods
- Twenty-one coprolites previously subjected to mtDNA analysis were subsampled; approximately 0.5 g was crushed, internal standards were added, lipids were microwave-extracted into 2:1 dichloromethane/CH3OH, hydrolyzed, and sterol and bile acid fractions were isolated and analyzed by GC and GC-MS.
- Origin assignments followed criteria from Bull and coworkers; carnivore identifications were confirmed with a coprostanol/cholesterol ratio of <1 plus bile acid profiles showing predominance of deoxycholic acid and higher proportions of cholic acid. Multiple radiocarbon dates were combined using Oxcal 4.3 “R_combine.”
- A bulrush shaft with S-twist twined basket or mat weft features was submitted for AMS radiocarbon analysis.
Limitations
- Stated: two coprolites yielded inconclusive results, likely from a mixture of environmentally derived lipids and low fecal lipid preservation; six coprolites classified as human by mtDNA were classified as carnivore by biomarkers, possibly because about a quarter of North American subjects in a prior study showed little to no conversion of cholesterol to coprostanol, potentially causing false negatives.
- Stated: one coprolite was interpreted as possible human/carnivore mixing due to a high proportion of CDCA; several coprolites share the same catalog number, so the authors cannot be 100% certain they analyzed the same coprolite as the mtDNA study; one coprolite was potentially carnivore but could not be confirmed due to lack of bile acids.
- Evident: fecal biomarker analysis lacks the detailed information mtDNA can provide and depends on sufficient compound preservation; lipid degradation increases with age and aerobic burial conditions, and only 13 of 21 biomarker interpretations agreed with mtDNA.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
11 of 49 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The lack of early human skeletal remains and the ethical issues associated with destructive analysis of the handful that have been discovered means that coprolites are the best direct archaeological evidence that people occupied a particular site.
“The lack of early human skeletal remains, and the ethical issues associated with destructive analysis of the handful that have been discovered (46, 47), means that coprolites are the best direct archaeological evidence that people occupied a particular site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] Callaway E., Ancient genome stirs ethics debate. Nature 506, 142– 143 (2014). 24522580 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [47] Rasmussen M., Anzick S. L., Waters M. R., Skoglund P., De Giorgio M., Stafford T. W. Jr., Rasmussen S., Moltke I., Albrechtsen A., Doyle S. M., Poznik G. D., Gudmundsdottir V., Yadav R., Malaspinas A.-S., White S. S. V, Allentoft M. E., Cornejo O. E., Tambets K., Eriksson A., Heintzman P. D., Karmin M., Korneliussen T. S., Meltzer D. J., Pierre T. L., Stenderup J., Saag L., Warmuth V. M., Lopes M. C., Malhi R. S., Brunak S., Sicheritz-Ponten T., Barnes I., Collins M., Orlando L., Balloux F., Manica A., Gupta R., Metspalu M., Bustamante C. D., Jakobsson M., Nielsen R., Willerslev E., The genome source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
All of the coprolites analyzed are identifiable as intact structures.
“All of the coprolites analyzed are identifiable as intact structures (figs. S4 and S5)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the six pre-Clovis coprolites identified as human by mtDNA, three are confirmed as human by fecal biomarker analysis.
“Of the six pre-Clovis coprolites identified as human by mtDNA, three are confirmed as human by this analysis (Fig. 2 and Table 1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A bulrush shaft with the features of an S-twist twined basket or mat weft fragment yielded a radiocarbon date of 12,273 ± 56 14C yr B.P.
“yielded a radiocarbon date of 12,273 ± 56 14C yr B.P. (table S3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a general trend toward the concentration of fecal sterols decreasing as radiocarbon age of the coprolite increases from 573 μg g−1 in the youngest coprolite to 9.5 μg g−1 in the oldest coprolite.
“there is a general trend toward the concentration of fecal sterols decreasing as radiocarbon age of the coprolite increases from 573 μg g−1 in the youngest coprolite to 9.5 μg g−1 in the oldest coprolite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Both carnivore mtDNA coprolites contain fecal biomarkers consistent with a carnivore origin.
“Both carnivore mtDNA coprolites contain fecal biomarkers consistent with a carnivore origin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The dated bulrush artifact was recovered above coprolite 185 directly dated to 12,290 ± 60 and 12,345 ± 55 14C yr B.P.
“This artifact was recovered above coprolite 185 directly dated to 12,290 ± 60 and 12,345 ± 55 14C yr B.P. (table S1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Six of the coprolites classified as human using mtDNA contain fecal biomarkers indicative of carnivores.
“Six of the coprolites classified as human using mtDNA contain fecal biomarkers indicative of carnivores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Coprolites 194 and 280 show agreement between both mtDNA and fecal biomarker analyses.
“These coprolites also show agreement between both mtDNA and fecal biomarker analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Coprolites 194 and 280 are the oldest coprolites determined to be unequivocally human based on fecal biomarker analysis.
“Coprolites 194 and 280 are the oldest coprolites determined to be unequivocally human based on fecal biomarker analysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two of the 13 coprolites reported as containing mtDNA from Lynx rufus (216) and Panthera leo (271) yielded fecal biomarker distributions consistent with those of a carnivore.
“Two of the 13 coprolites reported as containing mtDNA from Lynx rufus (216) and Panthera leo (271) yielded fecal biomarker distributions consistent with those of a carnivore.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Fecal biomarker interpretations for 13 of 21 coprolites analyzed agree with mtDNA classifications reported previously.
“Fecal biomarker interpretations for 13 of 21 coprolites analyzed agree with mtDNA classifications reported previously (Table 1) (3, 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Jenkins D. L., Davis L. G., Stafford T. W. Jr., Campos P. F., Hockett B., Jones G. T., Cummings L. S., Yost C., Connolly T. J., Yohe R. M. II, Gibbons S. C., Raghavan M., Rasmussen M., Paijmans J. L. A., Hofreiter M., Kemp B. M., Barta J. L., Monroe C., Gilbert M. T. P., Willerslev E., Clovis age Western Stemmed projectile points and human coprolites at the Paisley Caves. Science 337, 223– 228 (2012). 22798611 source
- cites [5] Gilbert M. T. P., Jenkins D. L., Götherstrom A., Naveran N., Sanchez J. J., Hofreiter M., Thomsen P. F., Binladen J., Higham T. F. G., Yohe R. M. II, Parr R., Cummings L. S., Willerslev E., DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America. Science 320, 786– 789 (2008). 18388261 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationown data
Pre-Clovis human occupation of the western Great Basin is confirmed using fecal lipid biomarkers and a new 14C date.
“We unequivocally confirmed pre-Clovis human occupation of the western Great Basin using fecal lipid biomarkers and a new 14C date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In some samples, water-soluble compounds, including non-endogenous DNA, could be moving through the profile.
“This suggests that, in some samples, water-soluble compounds, including non-endogenous DNA, could be moving through the profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Intact coprolite morphology constrains the interpretation of observed biomarkers to those consistent with the observed morphology.
“this is critical as it constrains the interpretation of observed biomarkers to those consistent with the observed morphology, i.e., a species assignment of a rat (for example) would not be viable, as it would be inconsistent with the shape of the coprolite.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Environmental conditions can greatly influence the preservation of fecal sterols.
“Environmental conditions can greatly influence the preservation of fecal sterols (30–33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [30] Nishimura M., Koyama T., The occurrence of stanols in various living organisms and the behavior of sterols in contemporary sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41, 379– 385 (1977). source
- cites [31] Hatcher P. G., McGillivary P. A., Sewage contamination in the New York Bight. Coprostanol as an indicator. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 1225– 1229 (1979). source
- cites [32] McCalley D. V., Cooke M., Nickless G., Coprostanol in Severn Estuary sediments. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25, 374– 381 (1980). 6775719 source
- cites [33] Bartlett P. D., Degradation of coprostanol in an experimental system. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 18, 27– 29 (1987). source
- Premisereasoning
The Western Stemmed Tradition is the oldest nonfluted lithic technology in the American Far West.
“The Western Stemmed Tradition (WST) is the oldest nonfluted lithic technology in the American Far West.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The three confirmed human pre-Clovis coprolites support the pre-Clovis age of the earliest occupation at Paisley Caves.
“supporting the pre-Clovis age of the earliest occupation at Paisley Caves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In one sample, the dates obtained on macrofossils and water-soluble extracts from a Camelidae coprolite were 12,125 ± 30 14C yr B.P. for the macrofossil and 11,315 ± 25 14C yr B.P. for the water-soluble extract.
“The results presented by Jenkins et al. (3) showed that, in one sample, the dates obtained on macrofossils and water-soluble extracts from a Camelidae coprolite were 12,125 ± 30 14C yr B.P. for the macrofossil and 11,315 ± 25 14C yr B.P. for the water-soluble extract.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Jenkins D. L., Davis L. G., Stafford T. W. Jr., Campos P. F., Hockett B., Jones G. T., Cummings L. S., Yost C., Connolly T. J., Yohe R. M. II, Gibbons S. C., Raghavan M., Rasmussen M., Paijmans J. L. A., Hofreiter M., Kemp B. M., Barta J. L., Monroe C., Gilbert M. T. P., Willerslev E., Clovis age Western Stemmed projectile points and human coprolites at the Paisley Caves. Science 337, 223– 228 (2012). 22798611 source
- Premisecitation
The innate hydrophobicity of lipid biomarkers means that lateral and vertical movement within burial contexts is minimal.
“Their innate hydrophobicity means that lateral and vertical movement within burial contexts is minimal (19, 20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] R. P. Evershed, P. H. Bethell, in Archaeological Chemsitry, Organic, Inorganic and Biochemical Analysis, M. V. Orna, Ed., ACS Symposium Series, 625, Chapter 13 (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1996), 459 p.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20] Lloyd C. E. M., Michaelides K., Chadwick D. R., Dungait J. A. J., Evershed R. P., Tracing the flow-driven vertical transport of livestock-derived organic matter through soil using biomarkers. Org. Geochem. 43, 56– 66 (2012). source
- Premisecitation
Carnivores differ from other animals in their bile acid composition and are identifiable from higher levels of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids in addition to deoxycholic acid.
“Carnivores differ from other animals in their bile acid composition and are identifiable from the higher levels of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acids in addition to deoxycholic acid (39–42).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [39] Wildgrube H. J., Stockhausen H., Petri J., Füssel U., Lauer H., Naturally occurring conjugated bile acids, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, in human, dog, and rabbit bile. J. Chromatogr. 353, 207– 213 (1986). 3700515 source
- cites [40] Fernández G. J., Corley J. C., Capurro A. F., Identification of cougar and jaguar feces through bile acid chromatography. J. Wildl. Manag. 61, 506– 510 (1997). source
- cites [41] Major M., Johnson M. K., Davis W. S., Kellogg T. F., Identifying scats by recovery of bile-acids. J. Wildl. Manag. 44, 290– 293 (1980). source
- cites [42] Johnson M. K., Belden R. C., Aldred D. R., Differentiating mountain lion and bobcat scats. J. Wildl. Manag. 48, 239– 244 (1984). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Only coprophagy would result in a human/canid mix of biomarkers in a discrete coprolite.
“This is supported by the fecal biomarker evidence, i.e., only coprophagy would result in a human/canid mix of biomarkers in a discrete coprolite.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The slow deposition of sediment and aerobic conditions of the burial environment likely caused the greater degradation of lipids in the oldest coprolites.
“The slow deposition of sediment and aerobic conditions of the burial environment is likely the cause for the greater degradation of lipids in the oldest coprolites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because of their source specificity, contamination of fecal biomarker analyses is very unlikely.
“However, because of their source specificity, contamination is very unlikely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Fecal biomarker methodology bypasses current uncertainties surrounding mtDNA.
“a methodology that bypasses current uncertainties surrounding mtDNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Human occupation at Paisley Caves is now proven to 12,200 14C yr B.P. using fecal lipid biomarkers.
“Human occupation at Paisley Caves is now proven to 12,200 14C yr B.P. using fecal lipid biomarkers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- It may state two separate claims as one. 27
- Probably not a substantial claim. 13
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCoprolites contain complex mixtures of lipids derived from the producer organism, its diet and biochemical processes occurring in its gut; some lipids are diagnostic of fecal origin.
“As well as being repositories of DNA, coprolites also contain complex mixtures of lipids derived from the producer organism, its diet and biochemical processes occurring in its gut; some lipids are diagnostic of fecal origin [e.g., (12, 13)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Bull I. D., Lockheart M. J., Elhmmali M. M., Roberts D. J., Evershed R. P., The origin of faeces by means of biomarker detection. Environ. Int. 27, 647– 654 (2002). 11934114 source
- cites [13] Prost K., Birk J. J., Lehndorff E., Gerlach R., Amelung W., Steroid biomarkers revisited - improved source identification of faecal remains in archaeological soil material. PLOS ONE 12, e0164882 (2017). 28060808 PMC5217961 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe Paisley Caves contain coprolites dating to 12,400 14C yr B.P. identified as human on the basis that they contain human DNA.
“The Paisley Caves contain additional evidence for pre-Clovis occupation in the form of coprolites dating to 12,400 14C yr B.P. identified as human on the basis that they contain human DNA (3, 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Jenkins D. L., Davis L. G., Stafford T. W. Jr., Campos P. F., Hockett B., Jones G. T., Cummings L. S., Yost C., Connolly T. J., Yohe R. M. II, Gibbons S. C., Raghavan M., Rasmussen M., Paijmans J. L. A., Hofreiter M., Kemp B. M., Barta J. L., Monroe C., Gilbert M. T. P., Willerslev E., Clovis age Western Stemmed projectile points and human coprolites at the Paisley Caves. Science 337, 223– 228 (2012). 22798611 source
- cites [5] Gilbert M. T. P., Jenkins D. L., Götherstrom A., Naveran N., Sanchez J. J., Hofreiter M., Thomsen P. F., Binladen J., Higham T. F. G., Yohe R. M. II, Parr R., Cummings L. S., Willerslev E., DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America. Science 320, 786– 789 (2008). 18388261 source
The indexed Abstract reports human mitochondrial DNA in directly dated coprolites from the Paisley 5 Mile Point Caves, supporting their identification as human and their pre-Clovis age. It gives the date as 12,300, not 12,400, radiocarbon years B.P.; searches for 12,400 found no matching passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDNA has been shown to be mobile in sediments in a range of environments and is relatively easy to degrade.
“DNA has been shown to be mobile in sediments in a range of environments and is also relatively easy to degrade.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Pedersen M. W., Overballe-Petersen S., Ermini L., Sarkissian C. D., Haile J., Hellstrom M., Spens J., Thomsen P. F., Bohmann K., Cappellini E., Schnell I. B., Wales N. A., Carøe C., Campos P. F., Schmidt A. M. Z., Gilbert M. T. P., Hansen A. J., Orlando L., Willerslev E., Ancient and modern environmental DNA. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20130383 (2015). 25487334 PMC4275890 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationFecal lipid biomarkers offer access to hitherto unknown or uncertain information, adding to the growing body of evidence about when and by what route people arrived and how these people adapted to diverse landscapes across the continent.
“Fecal lipid biomarkers offer access to hitherto unknown (or at best, uncertain) information, adding to the growing body of evidence that is helping to build a picture of not only when and by what route people arrived but also how these people adapted to diverse landscapes across the continent (48–50).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [48] Waters M. R., Forman S. L., Jennings T. A., Nordt L. C., Driese S. G., Feinberg J. M., Keene J. L., Halligan J., Lindquist A., Pierson J., Hallmark C. T., Collins M. B., Wiederhold J. E., The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas. Science 331, 1599– 1603 (2011). 21436451 source
- cites [49] Halligan J. J., Waters M. R., Perrotti A., Owens I. J., Feinberg J. M., Bourne M. D., Fenerty B., Winsborough B., Carlson D., Fisher D. C., Stafford T. W. Jr., Dunbar J. S., Pre-Clovis occupation 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site, Florida, and the peopling of the Americas. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600375 (2016). 27386553 PMC4928949 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) dates the Page-Ladson occupation to about 14,550 years ago, and the Conclusions (page unavailable) describe how its occupants adapted to their environment. The paper therefore contributes evidence about when people were present and how they lived, but it does not establish an arrival route or show that fecal lipid biomarkers provide this information; its dung-related proxy is fungal spores. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [50] Goebel T., Waters M. R., O'Rourke D. H., The late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas. Science 319, 1497– 1502 (2008). 18339930 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationConsumption of carnivore meat can be hazardous to human health due to parasitic infections and the bioaccumulation of toxins.
“Moreover, not only carnivores have a lower biomass transfer efficiency but also consumption of carnivore meat can be hazardous to human health due to parasitic infections and the bioaccumulation of toxins (35–37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [35] McGrew A. K., Ballweber L. R., Moses S. K., Stricker C. A., Beckmen K. B., Salman M. D., O’Hara T. M., Mercury in gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Alaska: Increased exposure through consumption of marine prey. Sci. Total Environ. 468-469, 609– 613 (2014). 24056451 PMC3870183 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says mercury bioaccumulates in organisms, and the Conclusion (page unavailable) identifies possible harmful effects of mercury exposure in Alaskan wolves. This supports the toxin-bioaccumulation concern, but the paper does not establish that eating carnivore meat is hazardous to humans or that it causes parasitic infections. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [36] Schurer J. M., Pawlik M., Huber A., Elkin B., Cluff H. D., Pongracz J. D., Gesy K., Wagner B., Dixon B., Merks H., Bal M. S., Jenkins E. J., Intestinal parasites of gray wolves (Canis lupus) in northern and western Canada. Can. J. Zool. 94, 643– 650 (2016). source
The discussion (draft p. 13) reports zoonotic parasites in wolves and identifies potential risks to human health. It does not say that eating carnivore meat transmits those parasites or address toxin bioaccumulation. The parasitic-health-risk portion is supported, but the claimed consumption route and toxin hazard are not. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Moleon M., Martínez-Carrasco C., Muellerklein O. C., Getz W. M., Muñoz-Lozano C., Sánchez-Zapata J. A., Carnivore carcasses are avoided by carnivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 1179– 1191 (2017). 28609555 source
The Conclusions (page unavailable) report lower biomass redistribution from carnivore carrion and a higher risk of parasite transmission when carnivores consume it. The paper does not establish that eating carnivore meat is hazardous to humans or attribute such a hazard to bioaccumulated toxins. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationmtDNA analyses rely upon amplification of ultratrace amounts of extant mtDNA using PCR, making the approach more sensitive and more susceptible to contamination.
“mtDNA analyses rely upon amplification of ultratrace amounts of extant mtDNA using the PCR, thereby making such an approach not only more sensitive but also more susceptible to contamination (45).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Llamas B., Valverde G., Fehren-Schmitz L., Weyrich L. S., Cooper A., Haak W., From the field to the laboratory: Controlling DNA contamination in human ancient DNA research in the high-throughput sequencing era. Sci. Technol. Archaeol. Res. 3, 1– 14 (2017). source
The brief technical overview says PCR was traditionally used to amplify specific DNA targets in ancient-DNA research, and the “Contaminating human DNA” section calls PCR amplification a potent source of contamination. The paper does not say that mtDNA analyses rely on PCR amplification of ultratrace amounts of extant mtDNA, or that this makes mtDNA analysis more sensitive and more susceptible to contamination. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningCoprophagy in canids is well-recognized and could explain both the presence of carnivore-derived lipids and human mtDNA, but it is unlikely that humans were eating carnivores.
“Coprophagy in canids is a well-recognized phenomenon (34) and could explain both the presence of carnivore-derived lipids and human mtDNA, but it is unlikely that humans were eating carnivores as suggested by Gilbert and coworkers (6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Livingston T. R., Gipson P. S., Ballard W. B., Sanchez D. M., Krausman P. R., Scat removal: A source of bias in feces-related studies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 33, 172– 178 (2005). source
- cites [6] Pedersen M. W., Overballe-Petersen S., Ermini L., Sarkissian C. D., Haile J., Hellstrom M., Spens J., Thomsen P. F., Bohmann K., Cappellini E., Schnell I. B., Wales N. A., Carøe C., Campos P. F., Schmidt A. M. Z., Gilbert M. T. P., Hansen A. J., Orlando L., Willerslev E., Ancient and modern environmental DNA. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20130383 (2015). 25487334 PMC4275890 source
The citation is attached to the statement that coprophagy in canids is well recognized. Searches of our copy for “coprophagy” and for dogs eating feces found no passage addressing that behavior; the closest material concerns fecal DNA analysis (References, entries 25–26). The later explanation involving lipids and human mtDNA is not specifically attributed to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationComparative assessment of lipids from coprolite 283 and a sediment sample collected directly underneath the coprolite reveals distinctly different distributions, with sediments differentiated by a high level of n-alkanols (C14-C34) with an even-over-odd predominance, characteristic of an input from higher plants.
“Comparative assessment of lipids derived from coprolite 283 and a sediment sample collected directly underneath the coprolite (table S2) reveal distinctly different distributions where sediments are differentiated by a high level of n-alkanols (C14-C34) with an even-over-odd predominance, characteristic of an input from higher plants (27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Eglinton G., Hamilton R. J., Leaf epicuticular waxes. Science 156, 1322– 1335 (1967). 4975474 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningTwo of the coprolites yielded inconclusive results, most likely arising from a mixture of environmentally derived lipids and low fecal lipid preservation.
“Two of the coprolites yielded inconclusive results, most likely arising from a mixture of environmentally derived lipids and low fecal lipid preservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOf the 18 coprolites identified as containing human mtDNA by Gilbert and coworkers, 10 are interpreted as human in origin, 6 are ascribed a carnivore origin, and a remaining coprolite is most likely of mixed human/carnivore origin.
“Of the 18 coprolites identified as containing human mtDNA by Gilbert and coworkers, 10 are interpreted as human in origin, 6 are ascribed a carnivore origin, and a remaining coprolite is most likely of mixed (human/carnivore) origin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataA single coprolite (195) reported to contain mtDNA from H. sapiens and Canis lupus/familiaris also yielded fecal biomarker distributions indicative of a mixed human/carnivore origin.
“A single coprolite (195) reported to contain mtDNA from H. sapiens and Canis lupus/familiaris also yielded fecal biomarker distributions indicative of a mixed human/carnivore origin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataOf the 13 agreeing coprolites, the majority indicate a human origin (both Homo sapiens mtDNA haplogroups A and B) and range in age from 1308 ± 28 to 12,260 ± 60 14C yr B.P.
“Of these, the majority indicate a human origin (both Homo sapiens mtDNA haplogroups A and B) and range in age from 1308 ± 28 to 12,260 ± 60 14C yr B.P.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone givenOf the remaining eight coprolites, two did not yield enough lipid to be viable for biomarker analysis.
“Of the remaining eight coprolites, two did not yield enough lipid to be viable for biomarker analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLipids, and hence fecal biomarkers, are chemically stable and, although some microbial or diagenetic alterations occur with time, the resulting structures can be linked back to their original source.
“Lipids (and hence fecal biomarkers) are chemically stable and, although some microbial or diagenetic alterations do occur with time, the resulting structures can be linked back to their original source (29).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Eglinton G., Logan G. A., Ambler R. P., Boon J. J., Perizonius W. R. K., Molecular preservation [and Discussion]. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 333, 315– 328 (1991). 1684047 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone given5β-stanols and bile acids have a substantial advantage over DNA in that they are hydrophobic and therefore unlikely to move within the stratigraphy of a sedimentary profile, highly recalcitrant within a sedimentary context over archaeological time scales, and highly diagnostic of fecal material and its producer organism(s).
“Critically, 5β-stanols and bile acids have a substantial advantage over DNA in that they are (i) hydrophobic and therefore unlikely to move within the stratigraphy of a sedimentary profile, (ii) highly recalcitrant (far more so than DNA) within a sedimentary context over archaeological time scales, and (iii) highly diagnostic of fecal material and its producer organism(s).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPeople first settled the Americas before Clovis.
“It is largely, but not entirely, accepted by the archaeological community that people first settled the Americas before Clovis (1–3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Wheat A., Survey of professional opinions regarding the peopling of the Americas. SAA Archaeol. Rec. 12, 10– 14 (2012).
- cites [2] Braje T. J., Dillehay T. D., Erlandson J. M., Klein R. G., Rick T. C., Finding the first Americans. Science 358, 592– 594 (2017). 29097536 source
- cites [3] Jenkins D. L., Davis L. G., Stafford T. W. Jr., Campos P. F., Hockett B., Jones G. T., Cummings L. S., Yost C., Connolly T. J., Yohe R. M. II, Gibbons S. C., Raghavan M., Rasmussen M., Paijmans J. L. A., Hofreiter M., Kemp B. M., Barta J. L., Monroe C., Gilbert M. T. P., Willerslev E., Clovis age Western Stemmed projectile points and human coprolites at the Paisley Caves. Science 337, 223– 228 (2012). 22798611 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenBulrush is one of the most common basketry fibers in the region; it is not natural to the cave deposits and is a cultural addition.
“Bulrush is one of the most common basketry fibers in the region; it is not natural to the cave deposits and is a cultural addition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe lipid differences between coprolite 283 and the underlying sediment show that the lipids are representative of the matrix from which they are derived and have experienced minimal leaching or lateral movement within the sedimentary profile.
“Crucially, this shows that the lipids are representative of the matrix from which they are derived and have experienced minimal leaching or lateral movement within the sedimentary profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe findings from the coprolites from Paisley Caves have been the subject of criticism.
“the findings from the coprolites from Paisley Caves have been the subject of criticism (7, 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Poinar H., Fiedel S., King C. E., Devault A. M., Bos K., Kuch M., Debruyne R., Comment on “DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America”. Science 325, 148 (2009). 19589985 source
- cites [8] Goldberg P., Berna F., Macphail R. I., Comment on “DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America”. Science 325, 148 (2009). 19589984 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThree coprolites identified as human were dated this way but showed agreement between the macroflora and solute dates.
“Three coprolites identified as human were also dated this way but showed an agreement between the macroflora and solute dates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Jenkins D. L., Davis L. G., Stafford T. W. Jr., Campos P. F., Hockett B., Jones G. T., Cummings L. S., Yost C., Connolly T. J., Yohe R. M. II, Gibbons S. C., Raghavan M., Rasmussen M., Paijmans J. L. A., Hofreiter M., Kemp B. M., Barta J. L., Monroe C., Gilbert M. T. P., Willerslev E., Clovis age Western Stemmed projectile points and human coprolites at the Paisley Caves. Science 337, 223– 228 (2012). 22798611 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisereasoningBecause PCR amplifies vanishingly low amounts of DNA, such analyses are particularly prone to contamination.
“Because the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method amplifies vanishingly low amounts of DNA, such analyses are particularly prone to contamination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe bulrush artifact date confirms the pre-Clovis age and stratigraphic integrity of the deposit.
“confirming the pre-Clovis age and stratigraphic integrity of the deposit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSites such as Coopers Ferry, Idaho and Paisley Caves, Oregon provide evidence that Western Stemmed Tradition technology predates Clovis, establishing it as the oldest well-defined technological tradition in North America, with links to late Pleistocene sites in East Asia and Siberia.
“Sites like Coopers Ferry, Idaho and Paisley Caves, Oregon provide evidence that WST technology predates Clovis, establishing this as the oldest well-defined technological tradition in North America, with links to late Pleistocene sites in East Asia and Siberia (3, 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Jenkins D. L., Davis L. G., Stafford T. W. Jr., Campos P. F., Hockett B., Jones G. T., Cummings L. S., Yost C., Connolly T. J., Yohe R. M. II, Gibbons S. C., Raghavan M., Rasmussen M., Paijmans J. L. A., Hofreiter M., Kemp B. M., Barta J. L., Monroe C., Gilbert M. T. P., Willerslev E., Clovis age Western Stemmed projectile points and human coprolites at the Paisley Caves. Science 337, 223– 228 (2012). 22798611 source
- cites [4] Davis L. G., Madsen D. B., Becerra-Valdivia L., Higham T., Sisson D. A., Skinner S. M., Stueber D., Nyers A. J., Keen-Zebert A., Neudorf C., Cheyney M., Izuho M., Iizuka F., Burns S. R., Epps C. W., Willis S. C., Buvit I., Late Upper Paleolithic occupation at Cooper’s Ferry, Idaho, USA, ~16,000 years ago. Science 365, 891– 897 (2019). 31467216 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation5β-stanols and bile acids are two lipid compound classes already well established as fecal biomarkers.
“5β-stanols and bile acids are two lipid compound classes already well established as fecal biomarkers [see (12, 13) and references therein].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] Bull I. D., Lockheart M. J., Elhmmali M. M., Roberts D. J., Evershed R. P., The origin of faeces by means of biomarker detection. Environ. Int. 27, 647– 654 (2002). 11934114 source
- cites [13] Prost K., Birk J. J., Lehndorff E., Gerlach R., Amelung W., Steroid biomarkers revisited - improved source identification of faecal remains in archaeological soil material. PLOS ONE 12, e0164882 (2017). 28060808 PMC5217961 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLipid biomarkers are chemically stable, existing in rocks dating to 1.6 billion years.
“They are also chemically stable, with lipid biomarkers existing in rocks dating to 1.6 billion years (21), far greater than more recent archaeological time scales”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Brocks J. J., Love G. D., Summons R. E., Knoll A. H., Logan G. A., Bowden S. A., Biomarker evidence for green and purple sulphur bacteria in a stratified Palaeoproterozoic sea. Nature 437, 866– 870 (2005). 16208367 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationHuman feces are usually characterized by high levels of coprostanol and higher amounts of deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid.
“Conversely, human feces are usually characterized by high levels of coprostanol and higher amounts of deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid (43).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Elhmmali M. M., Roberts D. J., Evershed R. P., Bile acids as a new class of sewage pollution indicator. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 3663– 3668 (1997). source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSterols derived from canid feces are characterized by very high levels of cholesterol and only trace amounts, if any, of cholesterol-derived 5β-stanols (coprostanol and epicoprostanol) because canids lack the gut microbiota responsible for producing these compounds.
“Sterols derived from canid feces are characterized by very high levels of cholesterol, and only trace amounts (if any) of cholesterol-derived 5β-stanols (coprostanol and epicoprostanol) as canids lack the gut microbiota responsible for producing these compounds (38).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Leeming R., Ball A., Ashbolt N., Nichols P., Using faecal sterols from humans and animals to distinguish faecal pollution in receiving waters. Water Res. 30, 2893– 2900 (1996). source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationLittle to no cholesterol-to-coprostanol conversion may result in false negatives when differentiating human coprolites from carnivores and may explain the lack of agreement between mtDNA and fecal biomarker results in six coprolites.
“This may potentially result in false negatives when differentiating human coprolites from carnivores and may explain the lack of agreement between mtDNA and fecal biomarker results in these six coprolites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningCoprophagy of human feces by carnivores is one explanation for the mixed human/carnivore result in coprolite 195.
“One explanation for these results from a single specimen is coprophagy of human feces by carnivores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenSeveral coprolites are associated with the same catalog number, and we cannot be 100% certain that we analyzed the same coprolite that was analyzed for mtDNA.
“Several coprolites are associated with the same catalog number, and we cannot be 100% certain that we analyzed the same coprolite that was analyzed for mtDNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningCoprolites 283 and 185 are from the oldest deposits in the cave, so lower recovery of lipid is not unexpected.
“At 12,125 ± 30 14C yr B.P. (283) and 12,345 ± 55 14C yr B.P. (185), these both represent coprolites from the oldest deposits in the cave and a lower recovery of lipid is therefore not unexpected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationFecal biomarker analyses rely upon coprolites containing enough of each compound to enable detection and quantification, typically in the region of >0.4 μg g−1 coprolite, with the concentration of compounds remaining a direct reflection of age and depositional environment.
“Conversely, fecal biomarker analyses are reliant upon coprolites containing enough of each compound to enable detection and quantification (typically in the region of >0.4 μg g−1coprolite), with the concentration of compounds remaining being a direct reflection of age and depositional environment (30–33).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [30] Nishimura M., Koyama T., The occurrence of stanols in various living organisms and the behavior of sterols in contemporary sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41, 379– 385 (1977). source
- cites [31] Hatcher P. G., McGillivary P. A., Sewage contamination in the New York Bight. Coprostanol as an indicator. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 1225– 1229 (1979). source
- cites [32] McCalley D. V., Cooke M., Nickless G., Coprostanol in Severn Estuary sediments. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25, 374– 381 (1980). 6775719 source
- cites [33] Bartlett P. D., Degradation of coprostanol in an experimental system. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 18, 27– 29 (1987). source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningFecal biomarker analysis lacks the detailed information that mtDNA may provide but delivers a more rapid assessment of coprolites and can provide robust supporting evidence where mtDNA-based results are open to criticism.
“While fecal biomarker analysis lacks the detailed information that mtDNA may provide, it does deliver a more rapid assessment of coprolites that, as in this study, can provide robust supporting evidence where results obtained by mtDNA-based approaches are open to criticism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAbout a quarter of North American subjects in a study exhibited little to no conversion of cholesterol to coprostanol.
“Previous work has reported that about a quarter of North American subjects in a study exhibited little to no conversion of cholesterol to coprostanol (44).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Wilkins T. D., Hackman A. S., Two patterns of neutral steroid conversion in the feces of normal north americans. Cancer Res. 34, 2550– 2554 (1974). 4843533
Citations
Cites
Eglinton, G., & Hamilton, R. J. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.156.3780.1322 · Cited by 2,487
The Late Pleistocene Dispersal of Modern Humans in the Americas
Goebel, T., Waters, M. R., & O'Rourke, D. H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153569 · Cited by 599
The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from a Clovis burial site in western Montana
Rasmussen, M., Anzick, S. L., Waters, M. R., Skoglund, P., DeGiorgio, M., Stafford, T. W., Rasmussen, S., Moltke, I., Albrechtsen, A., Doyle, S. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13025 · Cited by 562
Biomarker evidence for green and purple sulphur bacteria in a stratified Palaeoproterozoic sea
Brocks, J. J., Love, G. D., Summons, R. E., Knoll, A. H., Logan, G. A., & Bowden, S. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04068 · Cited by 541
Using faecal sterols from humans and animals to distinguish faecal pollution in receiving waters
Leeming, R., Ball, A., Ashbolt, N., & Nichols, P. (1996) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00011-5 · Cited by 383
The origin of faeces by means of biomarker detection
Bull, I. D., Lockheart, M. J., Elhmmali, M. M., Roberts, D. J., & Evershed, R. P. (2002) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00124-6 · Cited by 363
Self-citationMeta‐barcoding of ‘dirt’ DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity
ANDERSEN, K., Bird, K. L., Rasmussen, M., Haile, J., Breuning‐Madsen, H., Kjær, K. H., Orlando, L., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Willerslev, E. (2011) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05261.x · Cited by 363
First dairying in green Saharan Africa in the fifth millennium bc
Dunne, J., Evershed, R. P., Salque, M., Cramp, L., Bruni, S., Ryan, K., Biagetti, S., & di Lernia, S. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11186 · Cited by 352
Adsorption of plasmid DNA to mineral surfaces and protection against DNase I
Romanowski, G., Lorenz, M. G., & Wackernagel, W. (1991) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.57.4.1057-1061.1991 · Cited by 333
Ancient and modern environmental DNA
Pedersen, M. W., Overballe-Petersen, S., Ermini, L., Sarkissian, C. D., Haile, J., Hellstrom, M., Spens, J., Thomsen, P. F., Bohmann, K., Cappellini, E., et al. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0383 · Cited by 329
DNA from Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America
Gilbert, M. T. P., Jenkins, D. L., Götherstrom, A., Naveran, N., Sanchez, J. J., Hofreiter, M., Thomsen, P. F., Binladen, J., Higham, T. F. G., Yohe, R. M., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154116 · Cited by 274
Self-citationHaile, J., Holdaway, R. N., Oliver, K. L., Bunce, M., Gilbert, M. T. P., Nielsen, R., Munch, K., Ho, S. Y. W., Shapiro, B., & Willerslev, E. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm016 · Cited by 259
Halligan, J. J., Waters, M. R., Perrotti, A., Owens, I. J., Feinberg, J. M., Bourne, M. D., Fenerty, B., Winsborough, B., Carlson, D., Fisher, D. C., et al. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600375 · Cited by 259
Eglinton, G., & Logan, G. A. (1991) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1991.0081 · Cited by 249
Nishimura, M., & Koyama, T. (1977) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(77)90265-4 · Cited by 239
The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas
Waters, M. R., Forman, S. L., Jennings, T. A., Nordt, L. C., Driese, S. G., Feinberg, J. M., Keene, J. L., Halligan, J., Lindquist, A., Pierson, J., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201855 · Cited by 229
Rapid hydrogenation of sterols in a contemporary lacustrine sediment
Gaskell, S. J., & Eglinton, G. (1975) · Nature · doi:10.1038/254209b0 · Cited by 227
Clovis Age Western Stemmed Projectile Points and Human Coprolites at the Paisley Caves
Jenkins, D. L., Davis, L. G., Stafford, T. W., Campos, P. F., Hockett, B., Jones, G. T., Cummings, L. S., Yost, C., Connolly, T. J., Yohe, R. M., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218443 · Cited by 194
Self-citationWidespread exploitation of the honeybee by early Neolithic farmers
Roffet-Salque, M., Regert, M., Evershed, R. P., Outram, A. K., Cramp, L. J. E., Decavallas, O., Dunne, J., Gerbault, P., Mileto, S., Mirabaud, S., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15757 · Cited by 187
Self-citationCramp, L., Jones, J. R., Sheridan, A., Smyth, J., Whelton, H. L., Mulville, J., Sharples, N., & Evershed, R. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2372 · Cited by 187
Self-citationLlamas, B., Valverde, G., Fehren-Schmitz, L., Weyrich, L. S., Cooper, A., & Haak, W. (2017) · STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1080/20548923.2016.1258824 · Cited by 160
Sewage contamination in the New York Bight. Coprostanol as an indicator
Hatcher, P. G., & McGillivary, P. A. (1979) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es60158a015 · Cited by 158
Prost, K., Birk, J. J., Lehndorff, E., Gerlach, R., & Amelung, W. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164882 · Cited by 154
Late Upper Paleolithic occupation at Cooper’s Ferry, Idaho, USA, ~16,000 years ago
Davis, L. G., Madsen, D. B., Becerra-Valdivia, L., Higham, T., Sisson, D. A., Skinner, S. M., Stueber, D., Nyers, A. J., Keen-Zebert, A., Neudorf, C., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax9830 · Cited by 142
Sterols of a contemporary lacustrine sediment
Gaskell, S. J., & Eglinton, G. (1976) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(76)90157-5 · Cited by 142
Shillito, L., Bull, I. D., Matthews, W., Almond, M. J., Williams, J. M., & Evershed, R. P. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.031 · Cited by 118
Self-citationBraje, T. J., Dillehay, T. D., Erlandson, J. M., Klein, R. G., & Rick, T. C. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao5473 · Cited by 117
Bull, I. D., Elhmmali, M. M., Roberts, D. J., & Evershed, R. P. (2003) · Archaeometry · doi:10.1111/1475-4754.00101 · Cited by 111
Self-citationEvidence concerning the roman military diet at Bearsden, Scotland, in the 2nd Century AD
Knights, B. A., Dickson, C., Dickson, J. H., & Breeze, D. J. (1983) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/0305-4403(83)90048-1 · Cited by 95
Bull, I. D., Evershed, R. P., & Betancourt, P. P. (2001) · Geoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/1520-6548(200102)16:2 · Cited by 90
Self-citationBull, I. D., Simpson, I. A., Dockrill, S. J., & Evershed, R. P. (1999) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0146-6380(99)00020-0 · Cited by 78
Self-citationCarnivore carcasses are avoided by carnivores
Moleón, M., Martínez‐Carrasco, C., Muellerklein, O. C., Getz, W. M., Muñoz‐Lozano, C., & Sánchez‐Zapata, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12714 · Cited by 75
Bile Acids as a New Class of Sewage Pollution Indicator
Elhmmali, M. M., Roberts, D. J., & Evershed, R. P. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9704040 · Cited by 69
Degradation of coprostanol in an experimental system
Bartlett, P. D. (1987) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0025-326x(87)90653-9 · Cited by 62
Comment on “DNA from Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America”
Goldberg, P., Berna, F., & Macphail, R. I. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167531 · Cited by 50
Comment on “DNA from Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America”
Poinar, H., Fiedel, S., King, C. E., Devault, A. M., Bos, K., Kuch, M., & Debruyne, R. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168182 · Cited by 49
McGrew, A. K., Ballweber, L. R., Moses, S. K., Stricker, C. A., Beckmen, K. B., Salman, M. D., & O'Hara, T. M. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.045 · Cited by 41
The Earliest Neolithic of Iran: 2008 Excavations at Sheikh-E Abad and Jani
(2013) · Oxbow Books · doi:10.2307/j.ctvh1dwnk · Cited by 39
Organic chemistry of balms used in the preparation of pharaonic meat mummies
Clark, K. A., Ikram, S., & Evershed, R. P. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315160110 · Cited by 38
Lloyd, C. E. M., Michaelides, K., Chadwick, D. R., Dungait, J. A. J., & Evershed, R. P. (2012) · Organic Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2011.11.001 · Cited by 37
Wildgrube, H. J., Stockhausen, H., Petri, J., Füssel, U., & Lauer, H. (1986) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(01)87090-4 · Cited by 33
Ledger, M. L., Grimshaw, E., Fairey, M., Whelton, H. L., Bull, I. D., Ballantyne, R. M., Knight, M., & Mitchell, P. D. (2019) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182019001021 · Cited by 29
Self-citationIntestinal parasites of gray wolves (Canis lupus) in northern and western Canada
Schurer, J. M., Pawlik, M., Huber, A., Elkin, B., Cluff, H. D., Pongracz, J. D., Gesy, K., Wagner, B., Dixon, B., Merks, H., et al. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2016-0017 · Cited by 28
Coprostanol in severn estuary sediments
McCalley, D. V., Cooke, M., & Nickless, G. (1980) · Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/bf01985541 · Cited by 24
Identification of Cougar and Jaguar Feces through Bile Acid Chromatography
Fernandez, G. J., Corley, J. C., & Capurro, A. F. (1997) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802608 · Cited by 19
Identifying Scats by Recovery of Bile Acids
Major, M., Johnson, M. K., Davis, W. S., & Kellogg, T. F. (1980) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3808391 · Cited by 17
Scat removal: a source of bias in feces-related studies
Livingston, T. R., Gipson, P. S., Ballard, W. B., Sanchez, D. M., & Krausman, P. R. (2005) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[172:srasob]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 14
Differentiating Mountain Lion and Bobcat Scats
Johnson, M. K., Belden, R. C., & Aldred, D. R. (1984) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3808480 · Cited by 8
Ancient genome stirs ethics debate
Callaway, E. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/506142a · Cited by 4
(1974) · PubMed
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- A. Wheat, Survey of professional opinions regarding the peopling of the Americas. SAA Archaeol. Rec. 12, 10–14 (2012).
- R. P. Evershed P. H. Bethell in Archaeological Chemsitry Organic Inorganic and Biochemical Analysis M. V. Orna Ed. ACS Symposium Series 625 Chapter 13 (American Chemical Society Washington DC USA 1996) 459 p.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Names for trace fossils 2.0: theory and practice in ichnotaxonomy
Bertling, M., Buatois, L. A., Knaust, D., Laing, B. A., Mángano, M. G., Meyer, N., Mikuláš, R., Minter, N. J., Neumann, C. H., Rindsberg, A. K., et al. (2022) · Lethaia · doi:10.18261/let.55.3.3 · Cited by 119
The what, how and why of archaeological coprolite analysis
Shillito, L.-M., Blong, J. C., Green, E. J., & van Asperen, E. N. (2020) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103196 · Cited by 88
Self-citationUndiscovered bird extinctions obscure the true magnitude of human-driven extinction waves
Cooke, R., Sayol, F., Andermann, T., Blackburn, T. M., Steinbauer, M. J., Antonelli, A., & Faurby, S. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43445-2 · Cited by 72
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867 · Cited by 64
Hebda, C. F. G., McLaren, D., Mackie, Q., Fedje, D. W., Pedersen, M. W., Willerslev, E., Brown, K. J., & Hebda, R. J. (2022) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107388 · Cited by 37
Blong, J. C., Adams, M. E., Sanchez, G. M., Jenkins, D. L., Bull, I. D., & Shillito, L. (2020) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-020-01160-9 · Cited by 34
Self-citationExpanding Paleoindian Diet Breadth: Paleoethnobotany of Connley Cave 5, Oregon, USA
McDonough, K. N., Kennedy, J. L., Rosencrance, R. L., Holcomb, J. A., Jenkins, D. L., & Puseman, K. (2022) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2021.141 · Cited by 29
Self-citationLivestock activity biomarkers: Estimating domestication and diet of livestock in ancient samples
Vázquez, C., Vallejo, A., Vergès, J. M., & Barrio, R. J. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103220 · Cited by 25
Biomarker proxies for reconstructing Quaternary climate and environmental change
McClymont, E. L., Mackay, H., Stevenson, M. A., Damm‐Johnsen, T., Honan, E. M., Penny, C. E., & Cole, Y. (2023) · Journal of Quaternary Science · doi:10.1002/jqs.3559 · Cited by 25
INITIAL HUMAN COLONIZATION OF THE AMERICAS, REDUX
Fiedel, S. J. (2022) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2021.103 · Cited by 20
Lerch, M., Bromm, T., Geitner, C., Haas, J. N., Schäfer, D., Glaser, B., & Zech, M. (2022) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-19-1135-2022 · Cited by 19
Elliott, S., & Matthews, W. (2023) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2023.02.005 · Cited by 19
Hudson, A. M., Emery-Wetherell, M. M., Lubinski, P. M., Butler, V. L., Grimstead, D. N., & Jenkins, D. L. (2021) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106936 · Cited by 18
Self-citationUnderstanding controls on stanols in lake sediments as proxies for palaeopopulations in Mesoamerica
Keenan, B., Imfeld, A., Gélinas, Y., & Douglas, P. (2022) · Journal of Paleolimnology · doi:10.1007/s10933-022-00238-9 · Cited by 17
Cramp, L. J. E., Bull, I. D., Casanova, E., Dunne, J., Roffet‐Salque, M., Whelton, H. L., & Evershed, R. P. (2023) · Handbook of Archaeological Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781119592112.ch26 · Cited by 13
Self-citationHolcomb, J. A., Mandel, R. D., Otárola‐Castillo, E., Rademaker, K., Rosencrance, R. L., McDonough, K. N., Miller, D. S., & Wygal, B. T. (2022) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2022.2135476 · Cited by 15
Intestinal parasites in the Neolithic population who built Stonehenge (Durrington Walls, 2500 BCE)
Mitchell, P. D., Anastasiou, E., Whelton, H. L., Bull, I. D., Pearson, M. P., & Shillito, L. (2022) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182022000476 · Cited by 13
Self-citationMallol, C., Égüez, N., Jambrina‐Enríquez, M., & Herrera‐Herrera, A. V. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112064 · Cited by 13
Rosencrance, R. L., McDonough, K. N., Smith, G. M., Jazwa, C. S., Duke, D. G., Jenkins, D. L., Clements, J., Stueber, D. O., & Henrikson, L. S. (2024) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2024.2407212 · Cited by 12
Self-citationA Holocene history of climate, fire, landscape evolution, and human activity in northeastern Iceland
Ardenghi, N., Harning, D. J., Raberg, J. H., Holman, B., Thordarson, T., Geirsdóttir, Á., Miller, G. H., & Sepúlveda, J. (2024) · Climate of the past · doi:10.5194/cp-20-1087-2024 · Cited by 11
Geographically diverse canid sampling provides novel insights into pre-industrial microbiomes
Yarlagadda, K., Zachwieja, A., de Flamingh, A., Phungviwatnikul, T., Rivera‐Colón, A. G., Roseman, C. C., Shackelford, L., Swanson, K. S., & Malhi, R. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.0052 · Cited by 11
Dating and Analysis of Western Stemmed Toolkits from the Legacy Collection of Connley Cave 4, Oregon
Rosencrance, R. L., McDonough, K. N., Holcomb, J. A., Endzweig, P. E., & Jenkins, D. L. (2022) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2022.2088132 · Cited by 11
Self-citationCoprolite research: archaeological and paleoenvironmental potentials
Blong, J. C., & Shillito, L. (2021) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-020-01242-8 · Cited by 11
Self-citationCharacterizing the American Upper Paleolithic
Madsen, D. B., Davis, L. G., Williams, T. J., Izuho, M., & Iizuka, F. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ady9545 · Cited by 10
Kallenbach, E. (2023) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2023.105855 · Cited by 10
Frost Action during the Younger Dryas Inferred from Soil Micromorphology at Connley Cave 5, Oregon
Holcomb, J. A., McDonough, K. N., Rosencrance, R. L., Shillito, L., & Jenkins, D. L. (2023) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2023.2282316 · Cited by 9
Self-citationThe Search for Ice Age Americans
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.005 · Cited by 9
White, J. T., Henry, A., Kuehn, S. C., Loso, M. G., & Rasic, J. T. (2022) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2022.08.012 · Cited by 8
Blong, J. C., Whelton, H. L., van Asperen, E. N., Bull, I. D., & Shillito, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2023.1131294 · Cited by 7
Self-citationHerrera‐Herrera, A. V., Padrón-Herrera, H., Iriarte, E., Barroso, V. A., Moreno-Benítez, M., & Mallol, C. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109171 · Cited by 6
Knell, E. J. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103314 · Cited by 6
The Currey cycle of Great Salt Lake: an early Younger Dryas lake in the Bonneville basin, Utah, USA
Oviatt, C. G., Young, D. C., & Duke, D. G. (2024) · Journal of Quaternary Science · doi:10.1002/jqs.3644 · Cited by 5
Fiber Artifacts from the Paisley Caves: 14,000 Years of Plant Selection in the Northern Great Basin
Kallenbach, E. (2024) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2024.6 · Cited by 5
Fundurulić, A., Manhita, A., Filipe, V. G., Henriques, J. P., Marques, A. F., Celant, A., Magri, D., & Dias, C. B. (2023) · Separations · doi:10.3390/separations10020085 · Cited by 5
Envisioning a Western Clovis Ritual Complex
Sutton, M. Q. (2021) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2021.1933334 · Cited by 5
Coprolite diversity from the archeological site Gruta Do Gentio Ll, Unaí, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Gurjão, L., Dias, O. F., Neto, J., & Iñiguez, A. M. (2024) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/09596836241275019 · Cited by 4
McDonough, K. N., Gavin, D. G., Rosencrance, R. L., Davis, L. G., Kuehn, S. C., Smith, M. F., Snitker, G., Saban, C. V., & Szymanski, R. M. (2024) · Quaternary Science Advances · doi:10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100184 · Cited by 4
Analysis of microbiome diversity in coprolites from Caral, Peru
ALBIOTEC, L., & Jaramillo‐Valverde, L. (2022) · Bioinformation · doi:10.6026/973206300181159 · Cited by 3
Rosencrance, R. L., Smith, G. M., McDonough, K. N., Jazwa, C. S., Antonosyan, M., Kallenbach, E., Connolly, T. J., Culleton, B. J., Puseman, K., McGuinness, M., et al. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aec2916 · Cited by 3
Self-citationWidlok, T., & Cruz, M. D. (2022) · Edition Kulturwissenschaft · doi:10.14361/9783839460993 · Cited by 3
Capone, D., Holcomb, D., Lai, A., Meade, T., Reinhard, K. J., & Brown, J. M. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318140 · Cited by 2
Xu, P., Wu, D., Wang, T., Guo, S., Xiao, Q., Yang, J., Chen, L., Li, Z., Li, M., & Zhou, A. (2026) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2026.109940 · Cited by 2
Smith, G. M., Sturtz, S. N., Camp, A. J., Adams, K. D., Kallenbach, E., Rosencrance, R. L., & Hughes, R. E. (2022) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2022.40 · Cited by 2
Johnson, E., & Moretti, J. A. (2022) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2022.2075134 · Cited by 2
Gryczewska, N., Kot, M. A., Berto, C., Brancaleoni, G., Krajcarz, M. T., Cyrek, K. J., Sudoł-Procyk, M., Wojenka, M., Wilczyński, J., Chmielewska, M., et al. (2023) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2023.147 · Cited by 2
Camperio, G., Ladd, S. N., Prebble, M., Lloren, R., Argiriadis, E., Nelson, D. B., Krentscher, C., & Dubois, N. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01831-8 · Cited by 2
Geochemical Prospection and the Identification of Site Activity Areas
Milek, K., Heron, C. P., Armitage, R. A., & Manoukian, N. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119592112.ch51 · Cited by 2
‘Vai aparecer no jornal!’: o papel imprensa na divulgação arqueológica no Pará
de Godoy, R., & Barroso, J. J. (2020) · Cadernos do LEPAARQ (UFPEL) · doi:10.15210/lepaarq.v17i34.19343 · Cited by 1
Faecal biomarkers as evidence of human presence in the caves of Kraków-Częstochowa Upland
Gryczewska, N., Sulwiński, M., Kot, M. A., Krajcarz, M., Cyrek, K. J., Sudoł-Procyk, M., Wilczyński, J., Wojenka, M., Szymczak, K., & Suska‐Malawska, M. (2025) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2025.106311 · Cited by 1
Slepchenko, S. M., Ostapenko, S. N., Khrustalev, A. V., Kashevskaya, A., Tretyakov, N., & Bull, I. D. (2025) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182025100929 · Cited by 1
Self-citationLyman, R. L., Sutton, M. Q., Lubinski, P. M., & Gobalet, K. W. (2026) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2026.2624289 · Cited by 1
Li, K., Shao, K., Yang, Y., Plunkett, G., Spengler, R. N., Xu, B., Wu, Y., Tian, X., Wei, D., Wang, C., et al. (2026) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-026-02449-x · Cited by 1
Mackay, H., Whelton, H. L., Reuther, J. D., Potter, B. A., Edwards, M. E., Henderson, A. C. G., Bull, I. D., Baldwin, E., Clarke, C., Mayfield, R. J., et al. (2026) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2026.110193 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMonte Verde, Genetic Evidence, and the Peopling of the Americas
Meltzer, D. J., Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Pinotti, T., Heintzman, P. D., Pedersen, M. W., & Willerslev, E. (2026) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2026.2727824 · Cited by 1
Opposites Attract: Why a Bi-Polar, Hemispheric Perspective to the Peopling of the Americas is Needed
Goebel, T. (2022) · The Latin American studies book series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92503-1_17 · Cited by 1
Circadian rhythm and host genetics
Odriozola, A., González, A., Álvarez‐Herms, J., & Corbi, F. (2024) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/bs.adgen.2024.02.001 · Cited by 1
More than bones: rethinking ethics and epistemologies of bodily exuviae in archaeology
Shillito, L. (2025) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2026.2674935 · Cited by 1
Self-citation(2021) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-186-rc2
Clovis Adaptations and Pleistocene Megafaunal Extinctions
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.010
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.002
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.015
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.001
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.013
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.007
What Do You Do When No One’s Been There Before?
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.009
Glaciers, Climates and Environments of Ice Age North America
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.004
Who, from Where, When, and How?
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.008
Ascertaining Archaeological Evidence of Antiquity
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.006
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.011
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.012
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.014
Meltzer, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632867.003
Lerch, M. (2021) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-186-ac2
Lerch, M. (2021) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-186-ac1
(2021) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-186-rc1
Human Cultures and Plant Diversity in the Mountains of Mexico: An Introduction
Casas, A., & Blancas, J. (2022) · Ethnobotany of mountain regions · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77089-5_1-1
Human Cultures and Plant Diversity in the Mountains of Mexico: An Introduction
Casas, A., & Vázquez, J. J. B. (2023) · Ethnobotany of mountain regions · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99357-3_1
Shillito, L., & Gray, L. (2023) · Encyclopedia of earth sciences series/Encyclopedia of earth sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44600-0_267-1
Self-citationShillito, L. (2023) · Encyclopedia of earth sciences series/Encyclopedia of earth sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44600-0_266-1
Self-citationArdenghi, N. (2024) · Climate of the past · doi:10.5194/cp-2023-74-ac1
Dudgeon, K. (2023) · CentAUR (University of Reading) · doi:10.48683/1926.00112110
Tremblay, J. D., Douglas, P., Halperin, C. T., & Gélinas, Y. (2025) · Archaeometry · doi:10.1111/arcm.70077
White, J. T., & Johnson, J. F. C. (2026) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2026.109844
Analyse biogéochimique de marqueurs fécaux anciens pour l’étude des sociétés passées
Keenan, B. (2025) · ArchéoSciences · doi:10.4000/161fz
Holcomb, J. A., & Aiuvalasit, M. J. (2026) · Geoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/gea.70058
Human resilience in cold desert environments: Late Pleistocene archaeology at Connley Cave 4, USA
McDonough, K. N., Rosencrance, R. L., Jenkins, D. L., Holcomb, J. A., Sanchez, G. M., Smith, G. M., & Nyers, A. J. (2026) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2026.109997
Self-citationMarković, N., Steinhagen, F., Marinova, E., Brown, S., Mentzer, S. M., Miller, C., Spyrou, M. A., Roces, V., Reiter, E., Bulić, D., et al. (2026) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-026-02499-1
Rico, J. S., & Terry, R. C. (2026) · Palaios · doi:10.2110/palo.2025.047
From ancestral diets to modern dysbiosis: evolutionary insights from ancient gut microbiomes
Bobu, A. M., Cucu, A. I., Bianucci, R., & Costache-Enache, I.-I. (2026) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2026.1922647
Archaeogenetics, Epistemology, and the Peopling of the Americas
Potter, B. A., Zeng, T. C., Reich, D., Poinar, H. N., Flegontov, P., Llamas, B., Fiedel, S. J., Méndez, C., Barriga, J. L. G., Hidalgo, C. L., et al. (2026) · PaleoAmerica · doi:10.1080/20555563.2026.2747537
Metadata
- Authors
- Shillito, L.-M., Whelton, H. L., Blong, J. C., Jenkins, D. L., Connolly, T. J., & Bull, I. D.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shillito, Lisa-Marie
- Bull, Ian D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Published
- 2020-07-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- eaba6404-eaba6404
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7363456
- OpenAlex
- W3035091798
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 31.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/P003001/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- coprolites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review