Cited by 47Muscle Physiology and DisordersEstrogen and related hormone effectsAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Interaction of Glucocorticoid Hormones with Rat Skeletal Muscle: Catabolic Effects and Hormone Binding

Mayer, M., Shafrir, E., Kaiser, N., Milholland, R.J., Rosen, F.·1976·Metabolism

Abstract

The mechanism of action of glucocorticoid hormones on rat skeletal muscle was studied by following their effect on muscle weight, free amino acid content, activity of amino acid-metabolizing enzymes, and binding to cytoplasmic receptor proteins. A significant reduction of gastrocnemius muscle and body weight occurred following administration of cortisol, triamcinolone diacetate, and triamcinolone acetonide to adrenalectomized rats. Treatment with triamcinolone diacetate also reduced the level of several free amino acids and enhanced the activity of a myofibrillar protease in skeletal muscle. The hormone had, however, no effect on the activity of various enzymes involved in amino acid catabolism in muscle. In nephrosis, another condition of muscle wasting, the level of several muscle amino acids were also reduced to a lesser extent. Cortisol and triamcinolone acetonide, both of which induce muscle wasting, were found to bind to two distinct cytoplasmic proteins in muscle. Binding of the labeled hormones was followed at 0 C and could be observed in presence of a 1000-fold excess of the catabolically inactive steroid epicortisol. Binding of 3H-triamcinolone acetonide. In vitro competition experiments further suggest a correlation between steroid binding to the 3H-dexamethasone or 3H-triamcinolone acetonide site and their potency to induce muscle catabolism. It is concluded that skeletal muscle is a direct target organ for glucocorticoids, and that muscle responsiveness involves binding of the active hormones to cytoplasmic receptor sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0026-0495(76)90046-9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayer, M., Shafrir, E., Kaiser, N., Milholland, R. J., & Rosen, F.
Affiliations
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rosen, F.
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1976-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
157-167
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030285645
Cited by
47
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
glucocorticoids, skeletal muscle, muscle atrophy, cortisol, triamcinolone acetonide, triamcinolone diacetate, free amino acids, amino acid catabolism, glucocorticoid receptor, nephrosis, gastrocnemius, adrenalectomy
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Binding, Competitive, Dexamethasone, Glucocorticoids, Hydrocortisone, Male, Muscle Proteins, Muscles, Peptide Hydrolases, Progesterone, Protein Binding, Receptors, Cell Surface, Triamcinolone, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review