Cited by 37Hemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Can commissurotomized subjects compare digits between the visual fields?

Corballis, Michael C.·1994·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Sergent (Brain 113, 537-568, 1990) flashed pairs of digits to the opposite visual fields of three commissurotomized subjects (L.B., N.G. and A.A.), and found that they were highly accurate in deciding which digit was the larger, but at little or no better than chance in deciding whether the digits were the same or different. Experiment 1 confirmed that these subjects were better at relative than at same-different judgements. However their performance on relative judgements was considerably lower than in Sergent's study and could be explained largely in terms of the subjects' use of information available to a single hemisphere. A fourth subject, D.K., with section of the posterior corpus callosum only, had little difficulty with either task despite previous evidence of visual disconnection, and appeared able to transfer the information verbally. In Experiment 2, L.B. was better able to make both relative and same-different judgements when the digits were presented within either the left or right visual fields than when they were presented in opposite fields. These results suggest little, if any, interhemispheric transfer of either shape or numerical information following complete forebrain commissurotomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90119-8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although it has been proposed that callosotomy patients have the ability to transfer abstract information sub-cortically, there is substantial data to the contrary.

    “Although it has been proposed that callosotomy patients have the ability to transfer abstract information sub-cortically (Cronin-Golomb, 1986;Sergent, 1990), there is substantial data to the contrary (Corballis, 1994;Seymour et al., 1994;Kingstone and Gazzaniga, 1995).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corballis, M. C.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Corballis, Michael C.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-12
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1475-1486
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073786488
Cited by
37
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
corpus callosotomy, interhemispheric transfer, numerical information, visual field, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Corpus Callosum, Discrimination Learning, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Postoperative Complications, Mental Recall, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review