The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the maternal and neonatal outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 g. METHODS: Maternal and neonatal records of infants with birth weights of at least 4500 g were identified during 1991. Outcome variables included the mode of delivery and incidence of maternal and perinatal complications. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 227 infant and mother pairs. Mean (+/- standard deviation) birth weight was 4706 +/- 219 g. A trial of labor was allowed in 192 women, and elective cesarean delivery was performed in 35 patients. The overall cesarean rate, including elective cesarean delivery and failed trial of labor, was 30.8% (70 of 227). Of those undergoing a trial of labor, 82% (157) delivered vaginally. Shoulder dystocia occurred 29 times, for an incidence of 18.5% in vaginal deliveries for macrosomia. There were seven cases each of Erb palsy and clavicular fracture, and one humeral fracture. By 2 months of age, all affected infants were without permanent sequelae. There was no birth asphyxia or perinatal mortality related to delivery for macrosomia. Maternal complications included increased risk of lacerations requiring repair (especially third- or fourth-degree lacerations) when vaginal delivery was complicated by shoulder dystocia (relative risk [RR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-9.4). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to hemorrhage or hospital stay for women who had a vaginal delivery (with or without shoulder dystocia) compared with women who had a cesarean delivery. However, infectious morbidity increased significantly in those patients who underwent a cesarean after a trial of labor compared with women who had a vaginal delivery (RR 7.1, 95% CI 3.9-13.1) or elective cesarean birth (RR 5.4, 95% CI 3.1-9.4). Ninety-one percent of patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery had no complications. CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery is a reasonable alternative to elective cesarean for infants with estimated birth weights of at least 4500 g, and a trial of labor can be offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics
HENRIKSEN, T. (2008) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00016340801899289 · Cited by 454
Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216
(2020) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003606 · Cited by 331
Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia
Stotland, N. E., Caughey, A. B., Breed, E. M., & Escobar, G. J. (2004) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.010 · Cited by 301
Brody, S. (2003) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)03057-0 · Cited by 200
Yordan, J., Holbrook, B., Nirgudkar, P., Mozurkewich, E., & Blue, N. (2017) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604059 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- LIPSCOMB, K., GREGORY, K., & SHAW, K.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 558-564
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086267785
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00005-c
- The paper
- LIPSCOMB, K., GREGORY, K., & SHAW, K. (1995). The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00005-c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.