The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics
Abstract
Background. There has been a rise in the prevalence of large newborns over a few decades in many parts of the world. There is ample evidence that fetal macrosomia is associated with increased risk of complications both for the mother and the newborn. In current obstetrics, the macrosomic fetus represents a frequent clinical challenge. Evidence is emerging that being born macrosomic is also associated with future health risks. Objective. To provide a review of causes and risks, prevention, prediction and clinical management of suspected large fetus/fetal macrosomia, primarily aimed at clinical obstetricians. Methods. Medline and EMBASE were searched between 1980 and 2007 by combining either ‘fetal macrosomia’ or ‘large for gestational age’ with other relevant terms. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched for the term ‘fetal macrosomia’. Results and conclusions. Although the causes of high birthweight include both genetic and environmental factors, the rapid increase in the prevalence of large newborns has environmental causes. The evidence is extensive that maternal overweight and associated metabolic changes, including type 2 and gestational diabetes, play a central role. There is a paucity of studies of the effect of intervention before and/or during pregnancy on the risk of having an ‘overweight newborn’. It appears rational, however, that preventive measures should primarily be implemented before pregnancy and should include guidance about nutrition and physical activity in order to reduce the prevalence of overweight. In pregnancy, limited weight gain, especially in obese women, seems to reduce the risk of macrosomia, as do good control of plasma glucose among those with diabetes. Prediction of fetal macrosomia remains an inaccurate task even with modern ultrasound equipment. There is little evidence that routine elective delivery (induction or caesarean section) for the mere reason of suspected macrosomia should be employed in a general population. Vaginal delivery of a macrosomic fetus requires considered attention by an experienced obstetrician and preparedness for operative delivery, shoulder dystocia and newborn asphyxia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus* (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.2007.s5 · Cited by 10,338
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.7.1183 · Cited by 6,220
Boney, C. M., Verma, A., Tucker, R., & Vohr, B. R. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1808 · Cited by 2,303
Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity
Baird, J., Fisher, D., Lucas, P., Kleijnen, J., Roberts, H., & Law, C. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38586.411273.e0 · Cited by 1,185
Physical Activity/Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes
Sigal, R. J., Kenny, G. P., Wasserman, D. H., Castaneda-Sceppa, C., & White, R. D. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-9910 · Cited by 949
Birth Weight and Adult Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, and Obesity in US Men
Curhan, G. C., Willett, W. C., Rimm, E. B., Spiegelman, D., Ascherio, A. L., & Stampfer, M. J. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3246 · Cited by 916
Oken, E., & Gillman, M. W. (2003) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2003.69 · Cited by 912
Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women
(2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.3.436 · Cited by 757
Birth Weight and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis
Harder, T., Rodekamp, E., Schellong, K., Dudenhausen, J. W., & Plagemann, A. (2007) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwk071 · Cited by 681
Catalano, P. M., Huston, L., Amini, S. B., & Kalhan, S. C. (1999) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70662-9 · Cited by 680
Cited by
A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Sweeting, A., Wong, J., Murphy, H. R., & Ross, G. P. (2022) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnac003 · Cited by 928
Pinborg, A., Wennerholm, U. B., Romundstad, L. B., Loft, A., Aittomaki, K., Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Nygren, K. G., Hazekamp, J., & Bergh, C. (2013) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dms044 · Cited by 698
Ornoy, A. (2011) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.05.002 · Cited by 317
Pinborg, A., Henningsen, A. A., Loft, A., Malchau, S. S., Forman, J., & Andersen, A. N. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/det440 · Cited by 286
Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes
Brown, J., Alwan, N. A., West, J., Brown, S., McKinlay, C. J., Farrar, D., & Crowther, C. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011970.pub2 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- HENRIKSEN, T.
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-145
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2022707347
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 144
- FWCI
- 19.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00016340801899289
- The paper
- HENRIKSEN, T. (2008). The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340801899289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.