Caractéristiques temporelles de l'augmentation de sommeil paradoxal consécutif à l'apprentissage chez le Rat
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large number of studies consistently revealed increases in REM sleep after learning in rats, mice, and cats.
“With the use of a variety of tasks including classic, aversive, and appetitive conditioning procedures, a large number of studies consistently revealed increases in REM sleep after learning in rats, mice, and cats (100, 284, 389, 540, 708, 711-713, 747, 944, 1102, 1104, 1110, 1111).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [711]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- Leconte, P., & Hennevin, E.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1973-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 677-686
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071250546
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- REM sleep, sleep deprivation, avoidance conditioning, learning, sleep timing, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Male, Memory, Reaction Time, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep, REM, Time Factors, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
