Paradoxical sleep at selective times following training is necessary for learning
Abstract
Rats were trained in a two-way shuttle shock avoidance task, 20 trials per day for 5 consecutive days. In Experiment 1, groups were subjected to selective paradoxical sleep deprivation (PSD) for daily 4 hour periods. It was found that only PSD applied between 9-12 hours or 17-20 hours after the daily training sessions resulted in acquisition deficits. These vulnerable time periods coincided with polygraphically observed PS increases above normal levels following identical training procedures in previous studies. In Experiment 2, animals were only allowed PS during the 9-12 hour and 17-20 hour post training time "windows" observed in Experiment 1. For the remaining time each day, they were subjected to PSD. Acquisition was found to be unimpaired, despite this severe treatment. However, any other equivalent length PSD regime which overlapped with either of the time "windows" resulted in severe retardation of task acquisition. Results were believed to provide strong support for the sleep-learning hypothesis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selective deprivation of REM sleep during, but not outside of, identified PSWs impaired memory.
“Indeed, selective deprivation of REM sleep during, but not outside of, identified PSWs impaired memory (719,1101,1105,1106,1113,1115).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1113]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 8 · Cited by 126
- Authors
- SMITH, C., & BUTLER, S.
- Affiliations
- Trent University (CA)
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-473
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065384454
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- REM sleep, sleep deprivation, learning, avoidance learning, polygraphic sleep recording, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Avoidance Learning, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Mental Recall, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep, REM, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review